[問題] 當年軒三的雜誌評價?
感覺近幾年來軒三常被說砍劇情
或老玩家只喜歡純中國歷史背景
可是明明從楓之舞才開始帶入中國歷史
而且軒三明明超受歡迎的,知名度也遠比楓之舞高或後期幾作更高
卻說老玩家喜歡中國風,所以他們才做中國風
如果真那麼在意廣大玩家意見,那應該把遊戲改回2d才對啊
再來就是當初玩軒三我覺得收尾不錯啊
可是不知道從什麼時候開始
大家說到軒三 就一定提到砍劇情 好像嚴重缺失一樣
反觀五代劇情支離破碎還靠外傳、DLC補充
卻不常被像軒三這樣拿來說嘴
我想如果遊戲雜誌評析應該比一般玩家更專業吧?
所以想看看各大遊戲雜誌對三代評價是如何?
有提到虎頭蛇尾或不夠中國風嗎?
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.253.7.12
推
06/29 18:37, , 1F
06/29 18:37, 1F
→
06/29 18:38, , 2F
06/29 18:38, 2F
→
06/29 18:38, , 3F
06/29 18:38, 3F
推
06/29 18:45, , 4F
06/29 18:45, 4F
→
06/29 18:46, , 5F
06/29 18:46, 5F
→
06/29 18:46, , 6F
06/29 18:46, 6F
→
06/29 18:47, , 7F
06/29 18:47, 7F
→
06/29 18:47, , 8F
06/29 18:47, 8F
推
06/29 19:29, , 9F
06/29 19:29, 9F
→
06/29 19:29, , 10F
06/29 19:29, 10F
→
06/29 19:30, , 11F
06/29 19:30, 11F
→
06/29 19:30, , 12F
06/29 19:30, 12F
→
06/29 19:31, , 13F
06/29 19:31, 13F
→
06/29 19:31, , 14F
06/29 19:31, 14F
→
06/29 19:31, , 15F
06/29 19:31, 15F
推
06/29 19:40, , 16F
06/29 19:40, 16F
→
06/29 19:40, , 17F
06/29 19:40, 17F
→
06/29 19:49, , 18F
06/29 19:49, 18F
推
06/29 19:52, , 19F
06/29 19:52, 19F
推
06/29 20:07, , 20F
06/29 20:07, 20F
→
06/29 20:08, , 21F
06/29 20:08, 21F
→
06/29 21:02, , 22F
06/29 21:02, 22F
→
06/29 21:02, , 23F
06/29 21:02, 23F
→
06/29 21:05, , 24F
06/29 21:05, 24F
→
06/29 21:07, , 25F
06/29 21:07, 25F
→
06/29 21:11, , 26F
06/29 21:11, 26F
→
06/29 21:21, , 27F
06/29 21:21, 27F
→
06/29 21:22, , 28F
06/29 21:22, 28F
推
06/29 21:42, , 29F
06/29 21:42, 29F
推
06/29 22:14, , 30F
06/29 22:14, 30F
→
06/29 22:15, , 31F
06/29 22:15, 31F
→
06/29 22:16, , 32F
06/29 22:16, 32F
→
06/29 22:16, , 33F
06/29 22:16, 33F
→
06/29 22:16, , 34F
06/29 22:16, 34F
→
06/29 22:17, , 35F
06/29 22:17, 35F
→
06/29 22:41, , 36F
06/29 22:41, 36F
→
06/29 22:42, , 37F
06/29 22:42, 37F
→
06/29 22:42, , 38F
06/29 22:42, 38F
→
06/29 22:44, , 39F
06/29 22:44, 39F
還有 125 則推文
→
07/01 01:30, , 165F
07/01 01:30, 165F
→
07/01 01:30, , 166F
07/01 01:30, 166F
推
07/01 01:53, , 167F
07/01 01:53, 167F
→
07/01 01:54, , 168F
07/01 01:54, 168F
→
07/01 01:55, , 169F
07/01 01:55, 169F
推
07/01 08:32, , 170F
07/01 08:32, 170F
推
07/01 10:29, , 171F
07/01 10:29, 171F
推
07/01 11:24, , 172F
07/01 11:24, 172F
→
07/01 11:25, , 173F
07/01 11:25, 173F
→
07/01 11:25, , 174F
07/01 11:25, 174F
→
07/01 11:26, , 175F
07/01 11:26, 175F
推
07/01 11:28, , 176F
07/01 11:28, 176F
→
07/01 12:05, , 177F
07/01 12:05, 177F
推
07/01 13:21, , 178F
07/01 13:21, 178F
推
07/01 13:43, , 179F
07/01 13:43, 179F
推
07/01 18:24, , 180F
07/01 18:24, 180F
推
07/01 20:42, , 181F
07/01 20:42, 181F
→
07/02 00:44, , 182F
07/02 00:44, 182F
→
07/02 00:44, , 183F
07/02 00:44, 183F
→
07/02 00:44, , 184F
07/02 00:44, 184F
→
07/02 00:44, , 185F
07/02 00:44, 185F
→
07/02 00:44, , 186F
07/02 00:44, 186F
→
07/02 00:44, , 187F
07/02 00:44, 187F
→
07/02 00:44, , 188F
07/02 00:44, 188F
→
07/02 00:44, , 189F
07/02 00:44, 189F
→
07/02 00:45, , 190F
07/02 00:45, 190F
→
07/02 00:45, , 191F
07/02 00:45, 191F
→
07/02 00:45, , 192F
07/02 00:45, 192F
→
07/02 00:45, , 193F
07/02 00:45, 193F
→
07/02 00:45, , 194F
07/02 00:45, 194F
→
07/02 00:46, , 195F
07/02 00:46, 195F
→
07/02 00:46, , 196F
07/02 00:46, 196F
→
07/02 00:46, , 197F
07/02 00:46, 197F
→
07/02 00:46, , 198F
07/02 00:46, 198F
→
07/02 00:46, , 199F
07/02 00:46, 199F
推
07/02 00:54, , 200F
07/02 00:54, 200F
推
07/02 14:38, , 201F
07/02 14:38, 201F
推
07/02 19:34, , 202F
07/02 19:34, 202F
→
07/02 20:46, , 203F
07/02 20:46, 203F
推
07/03 11:16, , 204F
07/03 11:16, 204F
討論串 (同標題文章)