[閒聊] Fenway renovations start with pitching
Massarotti扔出一些想法 有沒有人幫忙快翻一下?!
文中提到
如果搞得定投手戰力&這兩年還想競逐冠軍 那麼就留下Ells
如果無力再簽大約(∵與A-Gon、CC簽下巨額長約) 那麼應該考慮交易掉Ells
他目前交易價值很高
舉例來說
拿Ells+Buchholz/Daniel Bard換Felix Hernandez 再用Beckett換個先發外野…
http://goo.gl/zLsJf
When the Red Sox ultimately get around to fixing their on-field problems, the
obvious focus should be on the pitching staff. And what the Red Sox need
there, more than anything else, can be summed up in one word.
Durability.
As the baton gets passed from Theo Epstein to Ben Cherington, let us all
acknowledge that the Red Sox' greatest fears were realized on the field this
season as much they were in their dysfunctional clubhouse. The Red Sox
entered 2011 with a shortage of pitching depth in their organization, a
problem that only magnified the clubhouse antics of a starting rotation that
should have been among the best in baseball.
Even before the fried chicken and beer, after all, there was reason to worry.
Among last year's projected rotation of Jon Lester, Josh Beckett, John
Lackey, Clay Buchholz and Daisuke Matsuzaka, the Red Sox had a disturbing
number of starters - specifically, four - who came with questions about their
durability.
Beckett? He has pitched 180 or more innings in consecutive seasons only once
in his career, that coming in 2006-07. Lackey? In three of the last four
seasons, amid persistent concern about his elbow, he has pitched 176 innings
or fewer. Meanwhile, linguine-thin righthander Clay Buchholz predictably
broke down (spinal stress fractures) and Daisuke Matsuzaka's elbow finally
popped after a career in which he demonstrated that he, too, is at best a
175-inning pitcher.
Through it all, the Red Sox got little or no help from their player
development system, which does not seem positioned to help much in 2012,
either.
For a team that has designs of playing in October, 175 innings should be a
floor, not a ceiling.
On the field, what the Red Sox need more than anything else now is innings -
lots of 'em - though acquiring them is admittedly a tricky task. Short of
someone like Mark Buehrle, the free-agent market is seemingly devoid of a
true innings guy with a long history of being able to take the ball, at least
when considering the level of performance necessary to succeed in the
American League East. (Sorry, Javier Vazquez fans.) That makes someone like
Buehrle an obvious target, though luring him away from Chicago may be
impossible.
For sure, C.J. Wilson is appealing. But with all the mistakes the Red Sox
have made on the free-agent market, is now the time to overpay again for the
best pitcher on the market? Didn't think so.
Remember, too, that the Red Sox are likely to be subtracting pieces here,
whether they be Beckett, Lackey or both. Even if Daniel Bard, Alfredo Aceves
or both move into the starting rotation, the durability issues remain. (Bard
currently seems to fatigue at 70 innings, let alone 170; Aceves has a history
of injury.) What all this means is that the Red Sox need to aggressively
explore the trade market for front-line pitching, something that may require
them to part with any number of valuable assets depending on the return.
Yes, Beckett should be able to get them something. But if the Sox can get
something valuable in return - and we're talking a true front-of-the-rotation
starter - then they must also consider moving Jacoby Ellsbury, who might very
well be the most valuable player of the American League.
With all due respect to Ellsbury fans, do the math. Ellsbury is eligible for
free agency in 2013 and, given his agent (Scott Boras) and history with the
Red Sox' medical staff, seems destined to depart following the 2013 season.
His trade value will never be higher than it is right now. If the Sox can get
something substantial for him - and that is a very big qualifier - they must
explore it now to benefit both the short-term and the long.
Let's make this clear: if the Sox can address their pitching needs and keep
Ellsbury, making them a championship contender for the next two seasons, then
keep him. But given the money the Sox have tied up in Carl Crawford ($142
million total from 2011-2017) and Adrian Gonzalez ($160 million total from
2011-2017), another blockbuster contract seems unlikely. The Red Sox owe it
to themselves to look into dealing Ellsbury now because there may not be
another chance.
What if the Sox can get Felix Hernandez from the Seattle Mariners for
Ellsbury (an Oregon native) and, say, Buchholz or Daniel Bard? What if
Beckett could then be dealt for a starting outfielder? Given the Sox'
decision involving Mike Cameron two winters ago, the team clearly has
reservations about Ellsbury's ability to play center field, anyway. So long
as Dustin Pedroia, Gonzalez and Kevin Youkilis remain in the middle of the
Boston lineup, the Red Sox have some offense to deal.
Again, do not misunderstand. Nobody is saying the Red Sox should blow up a
roster that looked like a dream team at the beginning of the year. But major
changes must be explored. If the price is right, Aramis Ramirez might be a
viable short-term solution at third base (a la Adrian Beltre) that would
allow the Sox to employ Youkilis as a designated hitter and backup corner
infielder, helping to prevent some of the wear and tear on Youkilis. (David
Ortiz could then get his wish of playing in New York.) Starting in 2012,
Hanley Ramirez's contract escalates to $15 million in Florida; is he
available? What about Matt Kemp, who is due to hit free agency at the end of
2012? Andre Ethier? Shane Victorino or B.J. Upton? The Red Sox need to look
at all of it.
And they need to be willing to pull the trigger.
During the watch of Epstein, at least, the Sox were unafraid to think big. So
long as John Henry, Tom Werner and Larry Lucchino are still at the core of
the decision-making, that is not likely to change. The last time the Red Sox
failed so spectacularly was in 2003, which happens to be the last time the
Sox fired a manager. That winter, Epstein had deals in place that would have
brought Alex Rodriguez (from Texas) and Magglio Ordonez (from the Chicago
White Sox) to Boston for Manny Ramirez (to Texas) and Nomar Garciaparra (to
Chicago). The deals blew up only when the players union objected to a
restructuring of Rodriguez' contract.
Whether the Sox would consider such bold moves now is open to debate, but
they have chips to deal. Beckett, Ellsbury and even Ryan Lavarnway have some
value. If a shortstop is coming back, Jose Iglesias could go, too. But
regardless of what the Red Sox do with their lineup - and they have lots of
options there - the one absolute certainty is that they must get one or two
starting pitchers who can come as close as possible to guaranteeing them 32
starts.
In so many ways, after all, the starting pitchers of the Red Sox in 2011 were
just so darned unreliable.#
--
Ⅲ Ⅲ
∕〃∕ 棒 球 即 生 活
∕ ∕ ︳
∕ ∕ \ 紅 襪 是 王 國
\ \ ﹨
╲ ╴︳ ̄
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.137.20.131
→
10/15 02:04, , 1F
10/15 02:04, 1F
※ 編輯: Orcish 來自: 220.137.20.131 (10/15 02:06)
推
10/15 02:12, , 2F
10/15 02:12, 2F
→
10/15 02:14, , 3F
10/15 02:14, 3F
→
10/15 02:21, , 4F
10/15 02:21, 4F
推
10/15 02:35, , 5F
10/15 02:35, 5F
→
10/15 04:01, , 6F
10/15 04:01, 6F
推
10/15 10:46, , 7F
10/15 10:46, 7F
推
10/15 10:56, , 8F
10/15 10:56, 8F
→
10/15 10:56, , 9F
10/15 10:56, 9F
推
10/15 10:59, , 10F
10/15 10:59, 10F
推
10/15 14:54, , 11F
10/15 14:54, 11F
推
10/15 15:05, , 12F
10/15 15:05, 12F
推
10/15 21:27, , 13F
10/15 21:27, 13F
→
10/15 21:27, , 14F
10/15 21:27, 14F
推
10/16 03:23, , 15F
10/16 03:23, 15F
推
10/16 10:19, , 16F
10/16 10:19, 16F
→
10/16 10:21, , 17F
10/16 10:21, 17F
推
10/16 10:27, , 18F
10/16 10:27, 18F
推
10/16 17:59, , 19F
10/16 17:59, 19F
討論串 (同標題文章)