Re: [討論] 放假了…該討論要怎麼補強了....
來看看自我感覺良好的米國鄉民怎樣談論
http://0rz.tw/rfb8D
C - If Varitek hangs them up (please!), then I still love Greg Zaun as a
backup catcher. He can hit a little, good for 60 to 80 starts, probably sign
for a year and $1.5 million...just a personal favorite, and unlike Kottaras,
he can actually hit.
心得:繼續用Tek?那不如放個立牌下去接球,還不用錢
Corner guy - There really isn't much in the FA market at 1st or 3rd, huh?
Branyon can hit, but he can't field, and we have Ortiz in 2010 clogging the
DH slot. VMart and Youk can play 1st, so I don't think looking at a first
basemanmakes a lot of sense. At third, you've got Figgins, and he would give
a team defensive flexibility, but he'll want lots of money, yes? One of chief
concerns for 2010 is that, if the Red Sox go into the season needing Lowell
to play 120 or more games healthy, they're asking for disaster. If he goes
down, then you'd have to go Youk at 3B every day, VMart at 1st everyday, and
then you're hurting at catcher, and not getting great defense at first base.
心得:不太需要一壘手,反正我們一堆人可以站一壘。不過倒是要考慮一下三壘。
賣肉需要健康一點才可以。阿?把Youk移往三壘,VMart一壘,那本壘勒?
放個立牌喔?要碼就補三壘,要碼就本壘。
SS - Again, not much in the FA market. The problem here is that the Red Sox
are still unsure what they have in Lowrie. Personally, I'm not convinced that
he'll ever be healthy enough that you don't have to worry about him, and it's
too important a position to just keep floating through each season. There's
no way Gonzalez is hitting .280 in a full season for Boston, and he can only
play SS, so if Lowrie is healthy, but you have other problems, you can't
really move Gonzalez around. Would Jack Wilson play in Boston for, say, 2
years/8 million? Would the Red Sox even want that?
心得:先把Nomar找回來吧,反正怎樣簽都很爛。
LF - We are all talking about Holliday, but what about Bay? What's the
difference in quality of play between the two? How about the difference in
contract amunt per season? Number of years? The Sox wouldn't have to cough up
draft picks to sign him (of course, they wouldn't get somebody else's pick
from Bay signing elsewhere, either, so perhaps that's just a wash). Is Bay a
4/52 guy? Too low? One idea - Carl Crawford has one year left at $10m with
the Rays. He's only 28 years old...any chance the Rays decide they won't be
able to keep him, and look to move him this off-season. The Red Sox would
need a chance to negotiate an extension prior to a trade, or else offer less
in return (not unlike the proposed Halladay deals in MLB this year). The Rays
would want a young SP, and a young OF or 1B, as part of the deal. Would the
Red Sox have that?
心得:找Crawford?那為啥不乾脆說找Braun算了....
是沒被搶夠嗎?我不覺得找Crawford會比從市場中找人簡單和划算。
Starting pitchers - Looking at the crap in the FA market, I'd go reclamation
(Harden and Hudson come to mind), and work to get a young, getting-expensive
starter. Josh Johnson in Florida isn't a FA for another three years, but he
is about to make some serious coin. The team wants to buy out his two
arbitration years and a couple years of FA, but he figures to get at least in
2010, $10m in 2011, and then enter the FA market as a 28 year-old after the
'11 season. We did it for Beckett, we could do it for Johnson, too....
心得;幹,是以為這樣和Marlins交易一下就會得WS喔。
Relievers - Maybe it's just me, but I still think Bowden can be a very good
major-league pitcher, and can be the 2010 Masterson. That would help fill out
the back end of the bullpen. Saito is not worth $6m to this team, but he was
quite good. Could we negotiate another incentive-laden contract that could
give him a nice salary if we end up using him a lot in 2010?
心得:又來Bowden了......
--
「寫下這些日記的人,在重新踏上阿根廷的土地時,就已經死去。我,已經不再是我。」
---Che Guevara---
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.127.51.56
推
10/14 20:00, , 1F
10/14 20:00, 1F
推
10/14 20:04, , 2F
10/14 20:04, 2F
推
10/14 20:14, , 3F
10/14 20:14, 3F
推
10/14 21:05, , 4F
10/14 21:05, 4F
→
10/14 21:06, , 5F
10/14 21:06, 5F
→
10/14 21:07, , 6F
10/14 21:07, 6F
→
10/14 21:07, , 7F
10/14 21:07, 7F
推
10/14 21:11, , 8F
10/14 21:11, 8F
推
10/14 22:39, , 9F
10/14 22:39, 9F
推
10/15 02:35, , 10F
10/15 02:35, 10F
→
10/15 02:36, , 11F
10/15 02:36, 11F
→
10/15 06:01, , 12F
10/15 06:01, 12F
推
10/15 08:52, , 13F
10/15 08:52, 13F
→
10/15 08:52, , 14F
10/15 08:52, 14F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 6 篇):