[討論] 建民被爆很正常吧,不過....
看板RedSox作者Sadastic (Sadastic Desire)時間20年前 (2005/09/30 13:26)推噓4(15推 11噓 25→)留言51則, 24人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
我覺得大部分的襪迷都有被害妄想症,以王建民那樣的滾地球型投手,本來就壓制不了紅襪
這樣的打線,所以板上一堆人說:"打爆王建民!!!打爆王建民"。我倒覺得沒什麼~~因為就
算王建民被爆了也不怎麼奇怪,他本來實力就沒好到可以壓制紅襪的打線。我看到這樣的言
論不會覺得怎樣, 很客觀啊XD ,美國方面對王的評價也是如此。
只是,板上的版友不知道是不是因為剛剛贏球,有點腦充血過頭了,對於剛剛的小白鬧版行
為的反應,真是讓人覺得很可笑。
明知道是小白,小白就是愛設坑給人跳,聰明的人一看就知道那是個坑,可是偏偏有人就喜
歡跳那個坑,然後來製造對立,設坑的人會說不關他的事,跳坑的人邊跳邊罵,還說不罵
不爽XD。這不是出自內心想藉由跳坑來借題發揮是怎樣,我就不相信板上的板友看不出
鬧版的板友說"支持王建民就是不愛國"這種話是狗屁。
不高興洋基或是王版的人可以幹在心理,但是藉由小白鬧版就把自己的反擊合理化進而去
攻擊別人實在是可笑的行為,不知道是被小白牽著走,還是被不理智牽著走。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.68.84.23
推
09/30 13:46, , 1F
09/30 13:46, 1F
推
09/30 13:47, , 2F
09/30 13:47, 2F
→
09/30 13:48, , 3F
09/30 13:48, 3F
→
09/30 13:49, , 4F
09/30 13:49, 4F
→
09/30 13:50, , 5F
09/30 13:50, 5F
→
09/30 13:51, , 6F
09/30 13:51, 6F
→
09/30 13:51, , 7F
09/30 13:51, 7F
推
09/30 13:51, , 8F
09/30 13:51, 8F
→
09/30 13:56, , 9F
09/30 13:56, 9F
推
09/30 13:57, , 10F
09/30 13:57, 10F
推
09/30 13:59, , 11F
09/30 13:59, 11F
→
09/30 13:59, , 12F
09/30 13:59, 12F
推
09/30 13:59, , 13F
09/30 13:59, 13F
→
09/30 14:00, , 14F
09/30 14:00, 14F
→
09/30 14:00, , 15F
09/30 14:00, 15F
→
09/30 14:00, , 16F
09/30 14:00, 16F
→
09/30 14:02, , 17F
09/30 14:02, 17F
推
09/30 14:03, , 18F
09/30 14:03, 18F
噓
09/30 14:03, , 19F
09/30 14:03, 19F
→
09/30 14:05, , 20F
09/30 14:05, 20F
推
09/30 14:05, , 21F
09/30 14:05, 21F
→
09/30 14:05, , 22F
09/30 14:05, 22F
→
09/30 14:07, , 23F
09/30 14:07, 23F
噓
09/30 14:09, , 24F
09/30 14:09, 24F
→
09/30 14:08, , 25F
09/30 14:08, 25F
→
09/30 14:09, , 26F
09/30 14:09, 26F
推
09/30 14:09, , 27F
09/30 14:09, 27F
→
09/30 14:10, , 28F
09/30 14:10, 28F
→
09/30 14:10, , 29F
09/30 14:10, 29F
→
09/30 14:11, , 30F
09/30 14:11, 30F
→
09/30 14:12, , 31F
09/30 14:12, 31F
推
09/30 14:18, , 32F
09/30 14:18, 32F
→
09/30 14:24, , 33F
09/30 14:24, 33F
→
09/30 14:37, , 34F
09/30 14:37, 34F
→
09/30 14:38, , 35F
09/30 14:38, 35F
噓
09/30 14:59, , 36F
09/30 14:59, 36F
噓
09/30 16:15, , 37F
09/30 16:15, 37F
噓
09/30 16:38, , 38F
09/30 16:38, 38F
噓
09/30 18:37, , 39F
09/30 18:37, 39F
噓
09/30 19:00, , 40F
09/30 19:00, 40F
噓
09/30 19:26, , 41F
09/30 19:26, 41F
噓
09/30 19:34, , 42F
09/30 19:34, 42F
噓
09/30 20:08, , 43F
09/30 20:08, 43F
噓
09/30 20:47, , 44F
09/30 20:47, 44F
推
09/30 20:59, , 45F
09/30 20:59, 45F
推
09/30 22:15, , 46F
09/30 22:15, 46F
推
09/30 22:51, , 47F
09/30 22:51, 47F
→
09/30 22:53, , 48F
09/30 22:53, 48F
推
10/01 00:05, , 49F
10/01 00:05, 49F
→
10/01 00:06, , 50F
10/01 00:06, 50F
推
10/01 01:28, , 51F
10/01 01:28, 51F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):