[建議] 考績法爭議大家要注意了
如同前面有板友說的其中最最重要的，就是取消一甲二乙升等，和75%降到65%這兩個
制度變更,強制3%丙等這種太激進的做法我個人覺得到最後通過的機會反而不大,因為
爭議大大了,不見得能獲得社會大眾的正面反應,反而得罪了一票公務員
在現在馬政府惜票如金的態度下應該會斟酌再議
萬一考試院趁著大家把焦點放在3%丙等上面而偷渡升等標準跟甲等比例,這一個反而影
響大家的權益最多,每年多10%的機機率得不到甲等,升等的機率降低更多,所以抗議的
目標不能只是3%的丙等而是整部考基法
還要麻煩大家想想什麼理由說服立委不要通過取消一甲二乙升等，和75%降到65%這兩個
東西
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.120.11.127
推
03/12 21:28, , 1F
03/12 21:28, 1F
→
03/12 21:28, , 2F
03/12 21:28, 2F
→
03/12 21:29, , 3F
03/12 21:29, 3F
→
03/12 21:29, , 4F
03/12 21:29, 4F
→
03/12 21:35, , 5F
03/12 21:35, 5F
→
03/12 21:36, , 6F
03/12 21:36, 6F
→
03/12 21:46, , 7F
03/12 21:46, 7F
→
03/12 21:46, , 8F
03/12 21:46, 8F
→
03/12 21:46, , 9F
03/12 21:46, 9F
推
03/12 21:56, , 10F
03/12 21:56, 10F
推
03/12 23:24, , 11F
03/12 23:24, 11F
推
03/12 23:33, , 12F
03/12 23:33, 12F
推
03/13 00:49, , 13F
03/13 00:49, 13F
→
03/13 00:49, , 14F
03/13 00:49, 14F
→
03/13 00:50, , 15F
03/13 00:50, 15F
推
03/13 02:39, , 16F
03/13 02:39, 16F
→
03/13 02:40, , 17F
03/13 02:40, 17F
推
03/13 05:35, , 18F
03/13 05:35, 18F
→
03/13 05:36, , 19F
03/13 05:36, 19F
→
03/13 05:37, , 20F
03/13 05:37, 20F
→
03/13 09:29, , 21F
03/13 09:29, 21F
→
03/13 09:38, , 22F
03/13 09:38, 22F
→
03/13 09:39, , 23F
03/13 09:39, 23F
推
03/13 11:21, , 24F
03/13 11:21, 24F
推
03/13 11:34, , 25F
03/13 11:34, 25F
推
03/14 22:06, , 26F
03/14 22:06, 26F
→
03/14 22:07, , 27F
03/14 22:07, 27F
推
03/16 00:12, , 28F
03/16 00:12, 28F
→
03/16 00:14, , 29F
03/16 00:14, 29F
討論串 (同標題文章)