[討論] 有沒有人想到"甲烷冰"?
剛剛被要求提出配套，我留了一個言給大家討論看看...
「配套不是該由專家告訴我們的嗎？怎麼變人民要想辦法...反過來想，那麼擁核的是不
是該先提出核安以及核廢料的配套？這分明不是該我們解決的事。好吧...硬要我提出的
話，政府補助太陽能、蓋風車，用電尖峰時段火力的車發電率提高，直到無鈾期間，致力
升級設備提升發電效率、投入發展釷能源、開採冰甲烷（別忘了台灣有很多），隨便一個
都比不可逆的核廢料好很多也沒有毀滅性的風險。離無鈾還有好幾年，就不能努力一下、
期待一下？」
能源局的舊刊物:冰甲烷 http://tinyurl.com/kg8f6ej
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 112.105.151.178
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PublicIssue/M.1398702271.A.7CD.html
※ 編輯: superbabyer (112.105.151.178), 04/29/2014 00:28:08
※ 編輯: superbabyer (112.105.151.178), 04/29/2014 00:29:35
→
04/29 00:32, , 1F
04/29 00:32, 1F
※ 編輯: superbabyer (112.105.151.178), 04/29/2014 00:33:25
→
04/29 00:33, , 2F
04/29 00:33, 2F
推
04/29 00:36, , 3F
04/29 00:36, 3F
推
04/29 00:37, , 4F
04/29 00:37, 4F
推
04/29 00:37, , 5F
04/29 00:37, 5F
推
04/29 00:38, , 6F
04/29 00:38, 6F
推
04/29 00:38, , 7F
04/29 00:38, 7F
→
04/29 00:39, , 8F
04/29 00:39, 8F
→
04/29 00:39, , 9F
04/29 00:39, 9F
→
04/29 00:40, , 10F
04/29 00:40, 10F
→
04/29 00:44, , 11F
04/29 00:44, 11F
→
04/29 00:45, , 12F
04/29 00:45, 12F
→
04/29 00:47, , 13F
04/29 00:47, 13F
推
04/29 00:47, , 14F
04/29 00:47, 14F
推
04/29 00:48, , 15F
04/29 00:48, 15F
→
04/29 00:50, , 16F
04/29 00:50, 16F
→
04/29 00:51, , 17F
04/29 00:51, 17F
推
04/29 00:59, , 18F
04/29 00:59, 18F
推
04/29 01:31, , 19F
04/29 01:31, 19F
推
04/29 02:17, , 20F
04/29 02:17, 20F
→
04/29 03:39, , 21F
04/29 03:39, 21F
推
04/29 06:36, , 22F
04/29 06:36, 22F
討論串 (同標題文章)