[閒聊]寫信給N社幹醮色違大嘴機率,叫我別擔心?
打了那麼多場大嘴娃,卻遇不到色違,真的很不爽。
大嘴娃頭目戰出現的頻率又少,追的好辛苦。
我這個五十幾歲的非洲阿伯為了追它還出了小車禍。
越想越不爽,大概十天前就寫信去質疑Niantic是不是有調低機率。
因為一開始寫信給N社有字數限制,所以先簡單吵一下。
Since in Reddit forum there is a statistic report showing
the probability of shiny Mawile which is 8%.I spent much money
buying premium passes to play RAID of Mawile .
But so far I played 77 times without shiny Mawile,
the probability of 77 continus Raids without shiny is almost ZERO.
Youtuber said Ninantic had adjusted the shiny probability down
without public announcement. This surreptitious adjustment is
cheating and illegal, so I claim Niantic should return my 77 premium passes.
不知道是阿伯我的英文爛,還是他們也是隨便看看,
可能也沒搞清楚我說什麼,結果他們回信也很隨便,
Hello Trainer,
Thank you for reaching out to us and for playing Pokemon GO.
As a fellow Trainer, I can understand your excitement & curiosity
to record a shiny Mawile on your Pokedex.
Let me share that different Raid Battle happens at different Gyms
and a Raid Boss that appears at Gyms is random.
So, I recommend you focus on Raids to increase your chances
of capturing a shiny Mawile.
It was great assisting you. Please let us know if you have any other questions
.
Have a great day and good luck with your Raid Battles!
接下來沒有字數限制了,我就寫清楚一點去質疑他們是否調過機率,
告訴他們調機率做弊的行為!!!!!
I do focus on RAID battles and so far I have played more than 1,200
RAID battles by much money and much time.
Among 12 hundreds battles, there are 77 battles especially for Boss Mawile.
77 is a huge number for a specific boss.
I know shiny Boss appears randomly.
The question is whether Niantic had adjusted
the rate of appearance of shiny Mawile?
If you did not adjust and the rate is still 8%,
it's almost impossible that I fought 77 Mawile RAIDs
and I never met a shiny one.
If you did adjust the rate without public announcement,
this adjustment is immoral and illegal.
Niantic has the right to adjust the rate for wild shiny monsters
because it is free for players.
On the other hand, Niantic has no right to adjust the rate
for shiny RAID boss since it is not free of charge.
Such as slot machines in casinos, they cannot adjust Jackpot rate
surreptitiously from high to low.
Therefore, if Niantic did ever adjust the rate of shiny Mawile,
it is a sort of cheating.
It is a kind of immoral sale method to attract customers and make earnings.
Niantic has to refund me those 77 premium RAID passes
I used for Mawile RAID battles with some other compensation.
If Niantic can make sure that they never adjust the rate of shiny Bosses,
please let me know and I won't complain.
接下來他們的回信還真是有意思,居然叫我繼續打,不用擔心。
Hello Trainer,
Glad to hear from you again.
I understand how upsetting this must be for you
for not being able to capture a shiny Mawile.
At the same time, as shared previously a Raid Boss that appears
at the Gyms or Pokemon in the wild is random and
the shiny one is the rare one.
Hence, you may have to spend more time in order to catch the one.
Not to worry, keep trying!
We also appreciate the feedback you have shared with us
about the rate of appearance of shiny Mawile.
Thank you for taking the time to share this with us.
If you have any other questions, we are always happy to help.
Happy hunting!
本來就是不太期待N社會正面回應我,回我 very rare 我能理解。
居然說 Not to worry. Keep trying. 這個我就覺得就很奇怪了。
低機率的東西居然敢叫客人繼續打不用擔心?
那我就當作是有保底囉!!!!!
所以我就繼續打,只是現在沒有雷達了,幾乎遇不到大嘴娃。
目前累積81場,無色違。
https://i.imgur.com/W6zFbVu.png
他叫我繼續打,別擔心。如果打到一百場還沒有的話,可以告他嗎? XD
另外,我覺得這句話也很詭異:
We also appreciate the feedback you have shared with us
about the rate of appearance of shiny Mawile.
機率設定根本只是N社程式裡面的一個參數,N社自己最清楚了!
幹嘛還要感謝我分享呢?
還是說你們調低了,然後感謝我提醒N社不要做弊調低機率呢?
補充一下,合法賭場是有受到協會的監管,不能偷調機率的。
頭目戰是要花錢的,就跟玩吃角子老虎一樣,輸贏看運氣沒錯。
因為機率很低遇不到,當然只能自認臉黑囉!
我也不會知道N社有沒有改過機率。
不過,如果有,就算沒人管,也是不道德的商業行為。
無論如何,沒有雷達的情況下,1百場似乎遙遙無期啊!!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 211.75.176.13
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PokemonGO/M.1522134555.A.433.html
※ 編輯: paulkao (42.77.102.2), 03/27/2018 15:11:17
推
03/27 15:10,
6年前
, 1F
03/27 15:10, 1F
→
03/27 15:11,
6年前
, 2F
03/27 15:11, 2F
我只是提醒對方不能偷改機率喔!不是要求保證取物。
推
03/27 15:12,
6年前
, 3F
03/27 15:12, 3F
→
03/27 15:13,
6年前
, 4F
03/27 15:13, 4F
推
03/27 15:13,
6年前
, 5F
03/27 15:13, 5F
是啊!但不能偷偷改低機率啊!
→
03/27 15:13,
6年前
, 6F
03/27 15:13, 6F
→
03/27 15:13,
6年前
, 7F
03/27 15:13, 7F
※ 編輯: paulkao (42.77.102.2), 03/27/2018 15:18:07
推
03/27 15:16,
6年前
, 8F
03/27 15:16, 8F
推
03/27 15:17,
6年前
, 9F
03/27 15:17, 9F
→
03/27 15:18,
6年前
, 10F
03/27 15:18, 10F
推
03/27 15:18,
6年前
, 11F
03/27 15:18, 11F
→
03/27 15:18,
6年前
, 12F
03/27 15:18, 12F
→
03/27 15:19,
6年前
, 13F
03/27 15:19, 13F
推
03/27 15:19,
6年前
, 14F
03/27 15:19, 14F
→
03/27 15:19,
6年前
, 15F
03/27 15:19, 15F
我也懷疑,畢竟隨機函數本來就可以搞成不夠隨機,
然後造成多一點的黑天鵝事件,莊家往往就能賺更多。
→
03/27 15:19,
6年前
, 16F
03/27 15:19, 16F
※ 編輯: paulkao (211.75.176.13), 03/27/2018 15:25:34
噓
03/27 15:25,
6年前
, 17F
03/27 15:25, 17F
推
03/27 15:26,
6年前
, 18F
03/27 15:26, 18F
噓
, , 19F
我不知道啊, 所以我直接問他, 不能問喔?
03/27 15:27
→
03/27 15:27,
6年前
, 20F
03/27 15:27, 20F
→
03/27 15:27,
6年前
, 21F
03/27 15:27, 21F
推
03/27 15:28,
6年前
, 22F
03/27 15:28, 22F
→
03/27 15:29,
6年前
, 23F
03/27 15:29, 23F
※ 編輯: paulkao (42.77.102.2), 03/27/2018 15:32:50
推
03/27 15:34,
6年前
, 24F
03/27 15:34, 24F
推
03/27 15:35,
6年前
, 25F
03/27 15:35, 25F
→
03/27 15:35,
6年前
, 26F
03/27 15:35, 26F
推
03/27 15:37,
6年前
, 27F
03/27 15:37, 27F
→
03/27 15:37,
6年前
, 28F
03/27 15:37, 28F
推
03/27 15:37,
6年前
, 29F
03/27 15:37, 29F
推
03/27 15:39,
6年前
, 30F
03/27 15:39, 30F
推
03/27 15:39,
6年前
, 31F
03/27 15:39, 31F
噓
03/27 15:40,
6年前
, 32F
03/27 15:40, 32F
還有 260 則推文
還有 9 段內文
→
03/28 13:24,
6年前
, 293F
03/28 13:24, 293F
→
03/28 13:25,
6年前
, 294F
03/28 13:25, 294F
推
03/28 13:50,
6年前
, 295F
03/28 13:50, 295F
噓
03/28 14:43,
6年前
, 296F
03/28 14:43, 296F
推
03/28 14:47,
6年前
, 297F
03/28 14:47, 297F
→
03/28 14:48,
6年前
, 298F
03/28 14:48, 298F
→
03/28 14:49,
6年前
, 299F
03/28 14:49, 299F
→
03/28 14:50,
6年前
, 300F
03/28 14:50, 300F
→
03/28 14:51,
6年前
, 301F
03/28 14:51, 301F
→
03/28 14:52,
6年前
, 302F
03/28 14:52, 302F
→
03/28 14:53,
6年前
, 303F
03/28 14:53, 303F
推
03/28 14:57,
6年前
, 304F
03/28 14:57, 304F
→
03/28 14:59,
6年前
, 305F
03/28 14:59, 305F
噓
03/28 15:47,
6年前
, 306F
03/28 15:47, 306F
推
03/28 16:43,
6年前
, 307F
03/28 16:43, 307F
噓
03/28 16:44,
6年前
, 308F
03/28 16:44, 308F
推
03/28 17:20,
6年前
, 309F
03/28 17:20, 309F
噓
03/28 18:34,
6年前
, 310F
03/28 18:34, 310F
噓
03/28 19:09,
6年前
, 311F
03/28 19:09, 311F
噓
03/28 19:11,
6年前
, 312F
03/28 19:11, 312F
噓
03/28 19:19,
6年前
, 313F
03/28 19:19, 313F
噓
03/28 21:19,
6年前
, 314F
03/28 21:19, 314F
推
03/28 21:30,
6年前
, 315F
03/28 21:30, 315F
→
03/28 21:38,
6年前
, 316F
03/28 21:38, 316F
→
03/28 21:55,
6年前
, 317F
03/28 21:55, 317F
推
03/28 22:14,
6年前
, 318F
03/28 22:14, 318F
→
03/28 22:15,
6年前
, 319F
03/28 22:15, 319F
噓
03/28 23:39,
6年前
, 320F
03/28 23:39, 320F
噓
03/29 01:01,
6年前
, 321F
03/29 01:01, 321F
噓
03/29 02:33,
6年前
, 322F
03/29 02:33, 322F
噓
03/29 07:01,
6年前
, 323F
03/29 07:01, 323F
噓
03/29 14:01,
6年前
, 324F
03/29 14:01, 324F
噓
03/29 22:05,
6年前
, 325F
03/29 22:05, 325F
噓
03/30 01:59,
6年前
, 326F
03/30 01:59, 326F
噓
03/30 05:10,
6年前
, 327F
03/30 05:10, 327F
噓
03/31 14:31,
6年前
, 328F
03/31 14:31, 328F
→
03/31 14:31,
6年前
, 329F
03/31 14:31, 329F
→
03/31 14:31,
6年前
, 330F
03/31 14:31, 330F
推
04/04 20:46,
6年前
, 331F
04/04 20:46, 331F
噓
04/12 13:38,
6年前
, 332F
04/12 13:38, 332F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):