Re: [情報] 鈴木裕 SEGA放莎木的版權比想像中容易
關冰桶甚麼事?
這事情明明就很簡單,搞那麼多歪理
幾句話就能搞定
一、SONY有沒有得到利益?
當然有,光是話題性就是一個
二、那SONY有沒有出資?
1.假設沒有:
那從玩家募資的行為關SONY什麼事
最有能力的人沒辦法出錢,還在自己場子宣傳
2.假設有:
那就是用KS來做宣傳/人氣測試
三、結論:
跳過日本業界兩個龍頭指標,都疑似不肯出錢
搞幕資活動充滿銅臭味,拿來榨乾最後的名氣
我不知道該為日本電玩界還是莎木感到悲哀
還看不懂、搞不清狀況我也沒辦法
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.243.25
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PlayStation/M.1434972898.A.BD6.html
※ 編輯: hasebe (59.115.243.25), 06/22/2015 19:35:10
→
06/22 19:35, , 1F
06/22 19:35, 1F
→
06/22 19:36, , 2F
06/22 19:36, 2F
因為我懶得打字了,這邊邏輯不通的人一大堆
如果有出錢更難看,就是純拿KS當廣告平台
要先搞清楚KS是什麼
有投資味道沒錯,但規定不能回饋利益
所以其實是
"獨立開發者Show自己"<="喜歡的人投資"
這種有秀味的競標場
噓
06/22 19:38, , 3F
06/22 19:38, 3F
這場滿滿銅臭味沒錯啊
大企業去KS蝦攪和像話嗎?
恕我智商不能理解,底下我看不懂的就不回了
→
06/22 19:39, , 4F
06/22 19:39, 4F
推
06/22 19:39, , 5F
06/22 19:39, 5F
→
06/22 19:39, , 6F
06/22 19:39, 6F
→
06/22 19:40, , 7F
06/22 19:40, 7F
→
06/22 19:40, , 8F
06/22 19:40, 8F
那有用KS宣傳嗎?
底下一樣搞不懂重點的不回
推
06/22 19:41, , 9F
06/22 19:41, 9F
→
06/22 19:41, , 10F
06/22 19:41, 10F
→
06/22 19:42, , 11F
06/22 19:42, 11F
→
06/22 19:42, , 12F
06/22 19:42, 12F
→
06/22 19:42, , 13F
06/22 19:42, 13F
→
06/22 19:42, , 14F
06/22 19:42, 14F
→
06/22 19:42, , 15F
06/22 19:42, 15F
→
06/22 19:43, , 16F
06/22 19:43, 16F
→
06/22 19:43, , 17F
06/22 19:43, 17F
→
06/22 19:43, , 18F
06/22 19:43, 18F
但SONY講難聽出來沾光關他屁事,還碰到KS
雖然KS本身也是有爭議過,但莎木這次沒問題
有問題的是SONY,如原文所說
→
06/22 19:43, , 19F
06/22 19:43, 19F
→
06/22 19:44, , 20F
06/22 19:44, 20F
→
06/22 19:44, , 21F
06/22 19:44, 21F
不明事理的多
當初我第一個跳出來戰Konami,看戰得多激烈
粉絲是盲目的
→
06/22 19:44, , 22F
06/22 19:44, 22F
→
06/22 19:44, , 23F
06/22 19:44, 23F
→
06/22 19:46, , 24F
06/22 19:46, 24F
→
06/22 19:46, , 25F
06/22 19:46, 25F
還扯阿
關冰桶屁事,漸凍人和莎木關係是?
→
06/22 19:46, , 26F
06/22 19:46, 26F
→
06/22 19:47, , 27F
06/22 19:47, 27F
→
06/22 19:47, , 28F
06/22 19:47, 28F
→
06/22 19:47, , 29F
06/22 19:47, 29F
→
06/22 19:48, , 30F
06/22 19:48, 30F
→
06/22 19:49, , 31F
06/22 19:49, 31F
→
06/22 19:49, , 32F
06/22 19:49, 32F
→
06/22 19:49, , 33F
06/22 19:49, 33F
還有 256 則推文
還有 21 段內文
→
06/22 23:10, , 290F
06/22 23:10, 290F
→
06/22 23:11, , 291F
06/22 23:11, 291F
→
06/22 23:12, , 292F
06/22 23:12, 292F
→
06/22 23:13, , 293F
06/22 23:13, 293F
→
06/22 23:14, , 294F
06/22 23:14, 294F
→
06/22 23:15, , 295F
06/22 23:15, 295F
噓
06/22 23:19, , 296F
06/22 23:19, 296F
噓
06/22 23:25, , 297F
06/22 23:25, 297F
推
06/22 23:27, , 298F
06/22 23:27, 298F
推
06/22 23:27, , 299F
06/22 23:27, 299F
→
06/22 23:28, , 300F
06/22 23:28, 300F
推
06/22 23:31, , 301F
06/22 23:31, 301F
→
06/22 23:32, , 302F
06/22 23:32, 302F
→
06/22 23:32, , 303F
06/22 23:32, 303F
推
06/22 23:35, , 304F
06/22 23:35, 304F
推
06/22 23:42, , 305F
06/22 23:42, 305F
噓
06/22 23:43, , 306F
06/22 23:43, 306F
推
06/23 01:30, , 307F
06/23 01:30, 307F
→
06/23 01:30, , 308F
06/23 01:30, 308F
→
06/23 01:30, , 309F
06/23 01:30, 309F
→
06/23 01:30, , 310F
06/23 01:30, 310F
→
06/23 01:30, , 311F
06/23 01:30, 311F
噓
06/23 01:43, , 312F
06/23 01:43, 312F
推
06/23 01:52, , 313F
06/23 01:52, 313F
→
06/23 01:53, , 314F
06/23 01:53, 314F
噓
06/23 02:15, , 315F
06/23 02:15, 315F
→
06/23 07:08, , 316F
06/23 07:08, 316F
→
06/23 07:12, , 317F
06/23 07:12, 317F
噓
06/23 11:34, , 318F
06/23 11:34, 318F
噓
06/23 13:38, , 319F
06/23 13:38, 319F
→
06/23 14:55, , 320F
06/23 14:55, 320F
噓
06/23 17:36, , 321F
06/23 17:36, 321F
→
06/23 17:36, , 322F
06/23 17:36, 322F
推
06/23 18:29, , 323F
06/23 18:29, 323F
→
06/23 18:30, , 324F
06/23 18:30, 324F
噓
06/23 18:49, , 325F
06/23 18:49, 325F
推
06/23 19:29, , 326F
06/23 19:29, 326F
推
06/23 20:02, , 327F
06/23 20:02, 327F
推
06/23 22:39, , 328F
06/23 22:39, 328F
→
02/16 21:35, , 329F
02/16 21:35, 329F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):