Re: [書籍] 關於應用數學的書籍
※ 引述《henrypinge (Edward)》之銘言：
: 物理讀了兩年 越來越像一隻"鸚鵡" 課本怎麼"叫" 我就學著怎麼"叫"
: 會不會正確的使用變分? 如果課本有例子 那當然會"模仿解題步驟"
: 如果課本沒有例子 只有裝死的份
: 有時候猜的到可能的解法 但是不知道怎樣用對的數學方法切入
: 課本寫的"行雲流水" 好像很理所當然(天知道世界上"第一個"解出
: 這個問題的人花了多少時間....)
: 我了解到這種情況後 就在猜是那出了問題
: 問題八成出在"考試導向" 數學就是學學樣子(物數看在久還是沒有底子)
why not post your problem?
Newton does not know mathematical analysis.
But he invented calculus and used calculus CORRECTLY.
Actually, he is one of the first three greatest mathematician in history.
I mean rigorousness will spend much time and often stumble
in studying theoretical physics.
Newton was smart. He was not puzzled by the rigorousness of calculus
and made great contributions to physics.
However, Enstein's ability of math is not particularly good.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 112.104.90.40
噓
11/07 02:01, , 1F
11/07 02:01, 1F
※ 編輯: JohnMash 來自: 112.104.90.40 (11/07 02:15)
→
11/07 08:05, , 2F
11/07 08:05, 2F
→
11/07 08:09, , 3F
11/07 08:09, 3F
→
11/07 10:02, , 4F
11/07 10:02, 4F
→
11/07 10:03, , 5F
11/07 10:03, 5F
→
11/07 10:18, , 6F
11/07 10:18, 6F
推
11/07 10:22, , 7F
11/07 10:22, 7F
→
11/07 10:43, , 8F
11/07 10:43, 8F
→
11/07 10:44, , 9F
11/07 10:44, 9F
→
11/07 10:44, , 10F
11/07 10:44, 10F
→
11/07 10:45, , 11F
11/07 10:45, 11F
推
11/07 10:51, , 12F
11/07 10:51, 12F
→
11/07 10:51, , 13F
11/07 10:51, 13F
推
11/07 10:54, , 14F
11/07 10:54, 14F
→
11/07 10:54, , 15F
11/07 10:54, 15F
→
11/07 10:55, , 16F
11/07 10:55, 16F
→
11/07 10:55, , 17F
11/07 10:55, 17F
→
11/07 10:58, , 18F
11/07 10:58, 18F
→
11/07 10:59, , 19F
11/07 10:59, 19F
→
11/07 10:59, , 20F
11/07 10:59, 20F
→
11/07 11:00, , 21F
11/07 11:00, 21F
→
11/07 11:00, , 22F
11/07 11:00, 22F
→
11/07 11:01, , 23F
11/07 11:01, 23F
→
11/07 12:39, , 24F
11/07 12:39, 24F
推
11/07 13:49, , 25F
11/07 13:49, 25F
→
11/07 13:49, , 26F
11/07 13:49, 26F
推
11/07 14:33, , 27F
11/07 14:33, 27F
→
11/08 09:40, , 28F
11/08 09:40, 28F
→
11/08 09:40, , 29F
11/08 09:40, 29F
→
11/08 14:03, , 30F
11/08 14:03, 30F
討論串 (同標題文章)