[期刊] 投稿經驗
1.期刊: Green chemistry
2.結果: minor revised--> accepted
3.reviewer數目: 2
過程:
老闆覺得這次的題目創意性夠
因此和老闆討論後一開始先決定嘗試往高點數期刊投稿
反正被打槍就算了,就當作是經驗吧!
於是就各別往這些期刊投稿
a. Angewandte Chemie International Edition:
b. Journal of the American Chemical Society
之前早有耳聞這類期刊審稿速度很快,就算被rejected 也不會太浪費時間
投稿出去後,果然都只要一天就回來了
主編覺得應用性太"specific"
沒經過外審,直接rejected
c. Advanced materials
這次的審稿時間大概三個禮拜,還以為進入外審階段,有機會了!!
不過回來之後,結果也是一樣主編內審結果,直接rejected
理由也是一樣"specific application"
不過這位主編還推薦了另一個期刊給我參考
以下是mail內容:
"> Thank you for submitting the above-mentioned manuscript.
>
> Regretfully, I must inform you that the manuscript will not be considered
> further for ADVANCED MATERIALS.
>
> The reasons for this are that we receive considerably more papers than we
> can possibly publish in the limited available space, and that the results
> and content of your manuscript seem to be more suitable for a polymer
> science-related journal.
Therefore what I recommend is that the manuscript is considered for our
> journal Macromolecular Rapid Communications (http://www.mrc-journal.de),
> which is the journal of choice for rapid publication of high priority
> results in the field of polymer science and ranks 2nd by Impact Factor
> (2009 IF: 4.3) among all journals predominantly publishing original
> research in general polymer science.
> The Editor of Macromolecular Rapid Communications has agreed to this
> suggestion and would be happy to have your manuscript reviewed for this
> journal.
>
> If you choose to follow this suggestion, please upload your manuscript as
> a new submission to Macromolecular Rapid Communications using
> http://www.manuscriptxpress.com. In your cover letter, please mention this
> correspondence to expedite the handling of your manuscrip
後來老闆覺得如果參考他的期刊投稿,還不是要經過審查
而且也會有被rejected的可能,在考慮IF點數下,決定不考慮這期刊
繼續往下投,首先比較了Chem.commun. Anal.Chem. 及Green.Chem
的IF,以及這次實驗的主題與期刊scopes,最後決定Green chemistry
在cover letter中強調這次實驗的重點及其應用性
最後提出建議的reviewer有三位
1.Prof. Thomas Welton
2.Prof. Vivek Polshettiwar
3.Prof. Alejandro Cifuentes
前兩位算是與我這次實驗有關領域之大師
11/12 submission--> 12/3 回信內容: minor revised
I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been recommended for
publication in Green Chemistry subject to revision in line with the attached
reports
接著是reviewer的問題
第一位先說明accept的理由:
"This is a greatly improved synthetic methodology
resulting in ........, Therefore, I favour
publication as a communication in green chemistry."
接著提出五個問題,補一個ref. ,在討論中補上幾句話
都不算太刁難
第二位reviewer完全沒問題,並稱讚了一下,真是受寵若驚
"It is well-written and an excellent piece of work....
I recommend its publication in Green Chemistry. "
12/7 revised manuscript
12/8 收到accepted letter,速度真是快!!
"Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript. I am satisfied with the
changes you have made, and I am therefore pleased to inform you that your
paper has been accepted for publication in Green Chemistry."
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.135.56.103
推
12/08 15:54, , 1F
12/08 15:54, 1F
推
12/08 15:56, , 2F
12/08 15:56, 2F
推
12/08 16:47, , 3F
12/08 16:47, 3F
→
12/08 17:03, , 4F
12/08 17:03, 4F
推
12/08 18:22, , 5F
12/08 18:22, 5F
推
12/08 20:27, , 6F
12/08 20:27, 6F
推
12/09 09:37, , 7F
12/09 09:37, 7F
推
12/09 12:16, , 8F
12/09 12:16, 8F
→
12/09 13:13, , 9F
12/09 13:13, 9F
推
12/09 13:58, , 10F
12/09 13:58, 10F
推
12/09 15:39, , 11F
12/09 15:39, 11F
推
12/09 22:14, , 12F
12/09 22:14, 12F
推
12/09 22:22, , 13F
12/09 22:22, 13F
推
12/10 09:47, , 14F
12/10 09:47, 14F
推
12/11 18:27, , 15F
12/11 18:27, 15F
討論串 (同標題文章)