Re: [問題] 被接受的 Journal paper
※ 引述《petesfa (.....)》之銘言：
: Recommendation
: --------------
: Accept as is
: Comments to the Author
: ----------------------
: The reviewers appreciate your effort in elaborating the context for your work,
: and feel that your manuscript has been improved significantly during your
: revision. However, they are still somewhat concerned about the justification
: for your SAT-based approach, as well as about the manufacturability,
: scalability and performance aspects of your approach. Please try to address
: their concerns as best as you can when you prepare the final version of your
: paper.
: 希望有經驗的前輩能夠幫我鑑定一下~
: 感激不盡~
因該是已經接授, reviewer 已經不會再看了,
不過為了保險, 可以這樣寫
Dear Editor,
We would first express our sincere appreciation on the constructive comments
that aim to improve the quality of this paper and our research.
We have carefully revised the paper according to the reviews,
and the revision responses are provided below.
We sincerely hope that the revised paper is qualified for
the publication in the prestigious journal.
The reviewers appreciate your effort in elaborating the context for your wor
and feel that your manuscript has been improved significantly during your
revision. However, they are still somewhat concerned about the justification
for your SAT-based approach, as well as about the manufacturability,
scalability and performance aspects of your approach. Please try to address
their concerns as best as you can when you prepare the final version of your
paper.
Response: ... (如果無法立刻解決, 就寫一下困難之處及可能解決的方法, 做定性
討論即可, 不見得需要補什麼數據)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.30.199
推
09/25 23:38, , 1F
09/25 23:38, 1F
推
09/27 23:12, , 2F
09/27 23:12, 2F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：