Re: [問題] 美國案的問題
關於此問題，還可以再參考2000年的Sandra Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. 的判例
被告也是以專利律師應該是發明人抗辨，但法官認為，
專利律師的任務是幫助發明人取得專利，不能對抗發明人，因
此專利律師不能當作發明人。
Sandra Solomon v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. 00-1033:
" An attorney’s professional responsibility is to assist his or her client
in defining her invention to obtain, if possible, a valid patent with maximum
coverage. An attorney performing that role should not be a competitor of the
client, asserting inventorship as a result of representing his client. Cf.
Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Dep’t of Commerce, Manual of Patent
Examining Procedure app. R § 10.64 (7th ed.1998) ("Avoiding acquisition of
interest in litigation or proceeding before the [Patent and Trademark]
Office"). Thus, to assert that proper performance of the attorney’s role is
a ground for invalidating the patent constitutes a failure to understand the
proper role of a patent attorney. "
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.160.110.164
推
12/19 00:41, , 1F
12/19 00:41, 1F
→
12/19 02:19, , 2F
12/19 02:19, 2F
推
12/19 07:07, , 3F
12/19 07:07, 3F
推
12/19 13:16, , 4F
12/19 13:16, 4F
推
12/19 15:34, , 5F
12/19 15:34, 5F
推
12/19 15:57, , 6F
12/19 15:57, 6F
→
12/19 16:35, , 7F
12/19 16:35, 7F
→
12/19 16:35, , 8F
12/19 16:35, 8F
→
12/19 16:35, , 9F
12/19 16:35, 9F
→
12/19 16:37, , 10F
12/19 16:37, 10F
→
12/19 16:37, , 11F
12/19 16:37, 11F
→
12/19 16:38, , 12F
12/19 16:38, 12F
推
12/22 09:29, , 13F
12/22 09:29, 13F
討論串 (同標題文章)