[問題] 103判例一問

看板Patent作者 (= =+)時間14年前 (2010/01/11 12:09), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
It is impermissible within the framework of section 103 to pick and choose from any one reference only so much of it as will support a given position to the exclusion of other parts necessary to the full appreciation of what reference fairly suggests to one skilled in the art. In re Wesslau, 53 C.C.P.A. 746, 353 F.2d 238, 241, 147 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 391, 393 (CCPA 1965); see also In re Mercier, 515 F.2d 1161, 1165-66, 185 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 774, 778 (CCPA 1975). 這是有關 u.s.c. 103 條答辯時的判例,請問一下 有高人可以助為說明嗎? 叱謝 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 211.21.159.67

01/11 19:37, , 1F
有請咕狗大神
01/11 19:37, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #1BIgILcx (Patent)
文章代碼(AID): #1BIgILcx (Patent)