[討論] 為劍無極感到不值…
看完俠鋒第四集以後,這個感覺非常強烈
雖然知道這場要捧新角劍無極一定輸
但除了為劍無極必須遭受這種待遇不值以外,我真的不認為劍無極會輸成這樣,尤其是編
劇最近只要一編到劍無極的武戲,絕對會選擇性遺忘他會飄渺絕式這點。
當初九龍變後期劍無極明明就已經透過櫻吹雪的開導願意接納自己適合飄渺絕式,結果自
此之後劍無極除了剛出關用一劍無極極玄跟飄渺無極打爆酆都月以外,之後大戰永遠只有
一劍無悔,包括打曼邪音、小空跟這次打玄狐他都再也沒有用過系列招式
還得落的被小空評成連三尊也不如的評價,反而他師兄神田創個一劍無敵就足以跟曼邪音
打的有來有回,那他當初飄渺無極是練心酸的嗎?難道秒殺劍十酆都月只是意外?更別提
這次還是死都不用一劍飄渺而被打到快站不起來,這種待遇對我這種看著劍無極成長的戲
迷來說實在很難接受…
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.179.95
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Palmar_Drama/M.1411569025.A.213.html
→
09/24 22:32, , 1F
09/24 22:32, 1F
※ 編輯: terry955048 (59.115.179.95), 09/24/2014 22:33:59
→
09/24 22:35, , 2F
09/24 22:35, 2F
→
09/24 22:35, , 3F
09/24 22:35, 3F
→
09/24 22:36, , 4F
09/24 22:36, 4F
→
09/24 22:36, , 5F
09/24 22:36, 5F
→
09/24 22:37, , 6F
09/24 22:37, 6F
→
09/24 22:38, , 7F
09/24 22:38, 7F
→
09/24 22:39, , 8F
09/24 22:39, 8F
→
09/24 22:39, , 9F
09/24 22:39, 9F
→
09/24 22:40, , 10F
09/24 22:40, 10F
推
09/24 22:59, , 11F
09/24 22:59, 11F
→
09/24 23:03, , 12F
09/24 23:03, 12F
→
09/24 23:08, , 13F
09/24 23:08, 13F
推
09/24 23:10, , 14F
09/24 23:10, 14F
→
09/24 23:10, , 15F
09/24 23:10, 15F
→
09/24 23:11, , 16F
09/24 23:11, 16F
→
09/24 23:11, , 17F
09/24 23:11, 17F
→
09/24 23:12, , 18F
09/24 23:12, 18F
→
09/24 23:12, , 19F
09/24 23:12, 19F
→
09/24 23:12, , 20F
09/24 23:12, 20F
→
09/24 23:13, , 21F
09/24 23:13, 21F
推
09/24 23:16, , 22F
09/24 23:16, 22F
推
09/24 23:17, , 23F
09/24 23:17, 23F
→
09/24 23:24, , 24F
09/24 23:24, 24F
→
09/25 00:12, , 25F
09/25 00:12, 25F
→
09/25 00:13, , 26F
09/25 00:13, 26F
→
09/25 00:13, , 27F
09/25 00:13, 27F
→
09/25 00:14, , 28F
09/25 00:14, 28F
→
09/25 00:18, , 29F
09/25 00:18, 29F
→
09/25 00:18, , 30F
09/25 00:18, 30F
→
09/25 00:31, , 31F
09/25 00:31, 31F
→
09/25 00:32, , 32F
09/25 00:32, 32F
推
09/25 00:36, , 33F
09/25 00:36, 33F
→
09/25 00:36, , 34F
09/25 00:36, 34F
→
09/25 01:05, , 35F
09/25 01:05, 35F
→
09/25 01:06, , 36F
09/25 01:06, 36F
→
09/25 01:08, , 37F
09/25 01:08, 37F
推
09/25 07:50, , 38F
09/25 07:50, 38F
→
09/25 07:50, , 39F
09/25 07:50, 39F
→
09/25 08:39, , 40F
09/25 08:39, 40F
→
09/25 08:40, , 41F
09/25 08:40, 41F
推
09/25 09:42, , 42F
09/25 09:42, 42F
→
09/25 09:42, , 43F
09/25 09:42, 43F
→
09/25 10:45, , 44F
09/25 10:45, 44F
推
09/25 10:46, , 45F
09/25 10:46, 45F
→
09/25 11:39, , 46F
09/25 11:39, 46F
推
09/25 12:20, , 47F
09/25 12:20, 47F
→
09/25 13:00, , 48F
09/25 13:00, 48F
推
09/25 14:08, , 49F
09/25 14:08, 49F
→
09/25 14:08, , 50F
09/25 14:08, 50F
推
09/25 17:32, , 51F
09/25 17:32, 51F
→
09/25 17:32, , 52F
09/25 17:32, 52F
推
09/25 17:47, , 53F
09/25 17:47, 53F
推
09/25 18:50, , 54F
09/25 18:50, 54F
→
09/25 18:50, , 55F
09/25 18:50, 55F
推
09/25 18:53, , 56F
09/25 18:53, 56F
→
09/25 18:53, , 57F
09/25 18:53, 57F
推
09/26 11:58, , 58F
09/26 11:58, 58F
推
09/26 12:26, , 59F
09/26 12:26, 59F
→
09/26 12:27, , 60F
09/26 12:27, 60F
→
09/26 23:40, , 61F
09/26 23:40, 61F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
討論
30
63
討論
18
28
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):
討論
16
61
討論
17
33
討論
30
63
討論
18
28
討論
6
26