Re: [情報] Barbosa和Diaw可能會被交易到尼克!?
RealGM 也有差不多的消息. 我把原文貼過來.
One of the first plays Mike D'Antoni is expected to draw up as the
Knicks' new coach is for Stephon Marbury to run up the Garden floor ...
and out the door back to Phoenix to rejoin the Suns.
Once D'Antoni is formally named to succeed Isiah Thomas, he is expected
to try to make a push for two of his favorite Suns - forward Boris Diaw
and guard Leandro Barbosa, who reportedly have fallen out of favor with
Suns management. According to a person close to D'Antoni, one of his first
moves would be to get the Knicks to offer Marbury and his expiring
$22 million contract as a central part of the deal.
Because of the Suns players mentioned in this scenario, no one will be
surprised if D'Antoni starts lobbying Donnie Walsh today to call
Phoenix president Steve Kerr to begin trade talks.
"He loves Boris and Barbosa and he didn't like Marbury when he had him,"
said the source. "So this is the type of move that can jump-start D'Antoni's
program right off the bat. He went to New York with the notion that he
will have input and help alter the roster to get his kind of players."
Although Marbury played only a handful of games for D'Antoni before coming
to New York in January 2004, after two-plus seasons in Phoenix, D'Antoni
doesn't view Marbury as a winning player or someone he thinks can play
point guard in his system.
"D'Antoni and Marbury is going to be a bad fit," the source predicted.
"He views Marbury as a shooting guard, anyway."
Suns owner Robert Sarver reportedly is looking to get out from under
Diaw's contract that averages $9 million over the next four seasons.
Barbosa, the 2007 Sixth Man Award winner, makes an average of $7 million
over the next four seasons. For cap purposes, they make a combined $15
million, so it can't be a two-for-one. There would have to be another
player or two coming from Phoenix to make the deal work.
Why would Marbury be attractive, coming off ankle surgery and an awful
season? Sarver and the Suns could take his money off the books in July 2009,
leading to future cap flexibility. And with D'Antoni gone, they're also
going to want to revamp their roster to fit Kerr's vision.
In the meantime, Kerr still has Steve Nash, Amare Stoudemire and the human
cap-killer, Shaquille O'Neal. Other than those three, Kerr is apt to start
dealing off players who only help in D'Antoni's system.
The Knicks will be thrilled to get rid of Marbury, given all the losing
and controversy he has been a part of. If they can trade him for players
who have performed for D'Antoni, it's a win-win - unless Walsh is still
making grandiose plans to free up significant cap space for the summer
of 2010. Right now, he has very little space. But such a deal could derail
those dreams, depending on who's left standing on the Knicks' roster in
two summers.
At present, the Knicks will have $48 million on the books when LeBron James,
Dwyane Wade and Chris Paul lead the NBA's best free-agent class in years.
Obviously, the cap isn't going to increase much from its current figure of
$56 million, so Walsh has to be careful what he adds to the Knicks' payroll
(future first-round draft picks plus any mid-level free-agent signings).
Diaw's and Barbosa's contracts run through 2012.
D'Antoni is going to have lots of clout in selecting personnel - he should,
too, since he knows what kind of players he needs better than anybody else
- so the whole idea of getting into a cap-friendly situation could go by
the boards.
How will that make Walsh look, after he came into town talking about trying
to land a marquee player in 2010? Just know that D'Antoni is about winning
his way, doing it now and he probably isn't keen on waiting to see if Walsh
can maneuver his way to cap freedom after two more seasons. But Walsh could
overrule him and insist on going the free-agent route.
"D'Antoni's system is built for guys like Boris and Barbosa," the source
said. "They can make plays. That's what he looks for in players: Versatility
and the ability to score."
Which Knicks fit that description? Jamal Crawford. Maybe Nate Robinson. In
other words, nobody of any consequence.
So the big cleanup could start with Marbury, soon enough.
And not a moment too soon.
原文蠻容易懂的.我中文造詣不好.就不便翻譯了.
坦白說我喜歡的太陽隊多年來一直不包括教練,所以我對冷笑話沒甚麼感情.
批評他我可能也不會手軟. 這個主意真是個一廂情願的想法.
D'Antoni就算很賭爛 Sarver 跟 Kerr 也不用以為人家是白癡.雖然他們很接近了.
D'Antoni 的系統必須有 Barbosa 與 Diaw? Barbosa 我不敢說 ..
Diaw 這兩年打得跟夢遊一樣. D'Antoni 難道不用負責任?
憑甚麼 Diaw 去到尼克就會回到 05-06? 因為尼克沒有 Amare 與 Marion 佔位置?
還是因為尼克蜀中無大將? 沒有 Nash 在場上. Barbosa 跟 Diaw 又能打得多好?
尼克有 Nash 嗎?
站在太陽球迷立場. 甩掉 Diaw 一年九百萬的長期合約我舉雙手雙腳連同命根子贊成.
要 Barbosa 一起打包我也沒意見. 但換來只有一年合約的 Marbury 是啥意思?
太陽隊直接放棄 08-09 球季重建嗎?
只剩一年近 2100 萬的 Marbury 是準備重建的球隊最喜歡的合約.
太陽還有 O'neal 到 2010 的合約. 就算要提前重建也是等明年暑假的事.
況且太陽隊要 Marbury 幹嘛? 打爆 Parker、CP3、D-Will 嗎? 做得到嗎?
就算要跟你尼克交易. 也是 Diaw、Barbosa <---> Eddy Curry、Crawford
我們就吃點虧收這兩個黑洞.然後讓 Amare 以外的球員.全部在 2010 年合約結束。
Curry 的合約 2010 球隊有選擇權.
Crawford 到 2011.所以尼克你就補償我們再加個 Lee 怎麼樣?
否則 Diaw 與 Barbosa 我們可以在未來的ㄧ兩年慢慢尋求交易.
何需急於一時跟尼克換 Marbury?
再者多金如尼克. 明年暑假就可以擺脫一張逾兩千萬的合約. 讓球隊逐漸正常化.
怎會現在想收進兩張還有四年.總計一年 1500 萬以上的合約. 怎麼思考也不通.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.120.154.114
推
05/14 06:58, , 1F
05/14 06:58, 1F
推
05/14 07:13, , 2F
05/14 07:13, 2F
→
05/14 07:14, , 3F
05/14 07:14, 3F
※ 編輯: highmimi 來自: 59.120.154.114 (05/14 07:20)
※ 編輯: highmimi 來自: 59.120.154.114 (05/14 07:23)
→
05/14 07:38, , 4F
05/14 07:38, 4F
→
05/14 07:40, , 5F
05/14 07:40, 5F
→
05/14 07:48, , 6F
05/14 07:48, 6F
→
05/14 07:49, , 7F
05/14 07:49, 7F
→
05/14 07:49, , 8F
05/14 07:49, 8F
推
05/14 07:55, , 9F
05/14 07:55, 9F
推
05/14 12:35, , 10F
05/14 12:35, 10F
推
05/14 12:35, , 11F
05/14 12:35, 11F
推
05/14 12:55, , 12F
05/14 12:55, 12F
→
05/14 12:56, , 13F
05/14 12:56, 13F
推
05/14 13:03, , 14F
05/14 13:03, 14F
推
05/14 13:23, , 15F
05/14 13:23, 15F
推
05/14 14:32, , 16F
05/14 14:32, 16F
→
05/14 14:32, , 17F
05/14 14:32, 17F
→
05/14 14:33, , 18F
05/14 14:33, 18F
→
05/14 14:34, , 19F
05/14 14:34, 19F
推
05/14 15:02, , 20F
05/14 15:02, 20F
推
05/14 15:06, , 21F
05/14 15:06, 21F
推
05/14 15:35, , 22F
05/14 15:35, 22F
→
05/14 15:36, , 23F
05/14 15:36, 23F
→
05/14 15:36, , 24F
05/14 15:36, 24F
→
05/14 15:40, , 25F
05/14 15:40, 25F
→
05/14 15:40, , 26F
05/14 15:40, 26F
推
05/15 22:02, , 27F
05/15 22:02, 27F
→
05/15 23:12, , 28F
05/15 23:12, 28F
→
12/12 16:39,
5年前
, 29F
12/12 16:39, 29F
→
04/20 22:14,
5年前
, 30F
04/20 22:14, 30F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 14 篇):