Re: [注意]網友在澎湖「虎井嶼」目擊疑似虐貓慘劇
※ 引述《QCANCER (琉璃螃蟹)》之銘言：
: → h90257:我想問的是政府的這項規定有違反動物保育法嗎? 04/28 19:43
: → h90257:如果沒有違背 那動保人士是在反對什麼啊? 04/28 19:44
基本上
動保人士最反的就是把動物送到收容所(這也就是他們批評之前縣府政策的主因)
因為動保人士的觀念裡 送到收容所=虐待動物
可是 就法律上來說虐待動物當然違法(ex某台大博士生)
但送到收容所卻不違法
彼此觀念差異在此
這也正是問題的癥結點
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 123.193.33.118
→
04/28 20:45, , 1F
04/28 20:45, 1F
→
04/28 21:00, , 2F
04/28 21:00, 2F
→
04/28 21:05, , 3F
04/28 21:05, 3F
→
04/28 21:13, , 4F
04/28 21:13, 4F
推
04/28 21:25, , 5F
04/28 21:25, 5F
推
04/28 21:42, , 6F
04/28 21:42, 6F
→
04/28 21:43, , 7F
04/28 21:43, 7F
→
04/28 21:44, , 8F
04/28 21:44, 8F
推
04/28 21:44, , 9F
04/28 21:44, 9F
→
04/28 21:54, , 10F
04/28 21:54, 10F
推
04/29 00:15, , 11F
04/29 00:15, 11F
→
04/29 00:16, , 12F
04/29 00:16, 12F
→
04/29 00:16, , 13F
04/29 00:16, 13F
→
04/29 00:17, , 14F
04/29 00:17, 14F
→
04/29 00:17, , 15F
04/29 00:17, 15F
→
04/29 00:18, , 16F
04/29 00:18, 16F
→
04/29 00:19, , 17F
04/29 00:19, 17F
推
04/29 00:22, , 18F
04/29 00:22, 18F
推
04/29 07:22, , 19F
04/29 07:22, 19F
推
04/29 08:19, , 20F
04/29 08:19, 20F
討論串 (同標題文章)