[請益] 技嘉顯示卡散熱器銅管久後可能會氧化?
技嘉顯示卡散熱器銅管久後可能會氧化?
請問這個說法是真的嗎?正在考慮要買華碩還是技嘉的RX470= =
(不會超頻)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.237.244
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1484404359.A.4E5.html
→
01/14 22:33, , 1F
01/14 22:33, 1F
→
01/14 22:33, , 2F
01/14 22:33, 2F
那這個說法是被抹黑嗎?
還是說華碩微星的都有多鍍一層保護?
推
01/14 22:34, , 3F
01/14 22:34, 3F
推
01/14 22:34, , 4F
01/14 22:34, 4F
→
01/14 22:34, , 5F
01/14 22:34, 5F
華碩的防彎條不曉得夠不夠力阿
推
01/14 22:36, , 6F
01/14 22:36, 6F
推
01/14 22:38, , 7F
01/14 22:38, 7F
最近有想要玩黑色沙漠,不過主要還是英雄聯盟/流亡黯道/全民打棒球居多@@
推
01/14 22:40, , 8F
01/14 22:40, 8F
怎麼知道銅管有沒有鍍鎳呢?
高科技竹筷還不曉得新機殼跟顯卡的位置能不能架~~~
推
01/14 22:42, , 9F
01/14 22:42, 9F
華碩的RX470玩不動黑沙嚕?效能會差很多嗎?
推
01/14 22:46, , 10F
01/14 22:46, 10F
→
01/14 22:47, , 11F
01/14 22:47, 11F
所以只是觀感問題= =?
以RX470來說,其實華碩/微星/技嘉的銅管也都有氧化的可能性嚕?
→
01/14 22:47, , 12F
01/14 22:47, 12F
→
01/14 22:49, , 13F
01/14 22:49, 13F
為什麼阿XD
推
01/14 22:56, , 14F
01/14 22:56, 14F
推
01/14 23:04, , 15F
01/14 23:04, 15F
推
01/14 23:06, , 16F
01/14 23:06, 16F
→
01/14 23:08, , 17F
01/14 23:08, 17F
我以為除了技嘉外,其它廠牌有做特殊處理...
怎麼我聽到的消息是特別只有說技嘉,好像技嘉特別有問題的感覺= =
推
01/14 23:11, , 18F
01/14 23:11, 18F
推
01/14 23:12, , 19F
01/14 23:12, 19F
RX470這塊我打算用很久欸,第一次買這麼貴的顯卡QQ
※ 編輯: e55698 (111.83.237.244), 01/14/2017 23:21:21
推
01/14 23:27, , 20F
01/14 23:27, 20F
推
01/14 23:31, , 21F
01/14 23:31, 21F
→
01/14 23:32, , 22F
01/14 23:32, 22F
推
01/14 23:35, , 23F
01/14 23:35, 23F
推
01/14 23:35, , 24F
01/14 23:35, 24F
→
01/14 23:36, , 25F
01/14 23:36, 25F
→
01/14 23:42, , 26F
01/14 23:42, 26F
推
01/14 23:44, , 27F
01/14 23:44, 27F
推
01/14 23:56, , 28F
01/14 23:56, 28F
推
01/14 23:59, , 29F
01/14 23:59, 29F
→
01/15 00:00, , 30F
01/15 00:00, 30F
→
01/15 00:04, , 31F
01/15 00:04, 31F
推
01/15 00:06, , 32F
01/15 00:06, 32F
→
01/15 00:11, , 33F
01/15 00:11, 33F
→
01/15 00:12, , 34F
01/15 00:12, 34F
推
01/15 00:13, , 35F
01/15 00:13, 35F
→
01/15 00:13, , 36F
01/15 00:13, 36F
推
01/15 00:13, , 37F
01/15 00:13, 37F
→
01/15 00:13, , 38F
01/15 00:13, 38F
→
01/15 00:14, , 39F
01/15 00:14, 39F
推
01/15 00:22, , 40F
01/15 00:22, 40F
推
01/15 00:24, , 41F
01/15 00:24, 41F
推
01/15 00:29, , 42F
01/15 00:29, 42F
推
01/15 00:32, , 43F
01/15 00:32, 43F
推
01/15 00:37, , 44F
01/15 00:37, 44F
→
01/15 00:37, , 45F
01/15 00:37, 45F
推
01/15 00:48, , 46F
01/15 00:48, 46F
推
01/15 00:52, , 47F
01/15 00:52, 47F
推
01/15 01:33, , 48F
01/15 01:33, 48F
→
01/15 01:33, , 49F
01/15 01:33, 49F
推
01/15 01:36, , 50F
01/15 01:36, 50F
→
01/15 01:40, , 51F
01/15 01:40, 51F
推
01/15 01:42, , 52F
01/15 01:42, 52F
→
01/15 01:45, , 53F
01/15 01:45, 53F
推
01/15 02:16, , 54F
01/15 02:16, 54F
→
01/15 02:16, , 55F
01/15 02:16, 55F
→
01/15 02:23, , 56F
01/15 02:23, 56F
推
01/15 02:32, , 57F
01/15 02:32, 57F
推
01/15 04:56, , 58F
01/15 04:56, 58F
推
01/15 09:27, , 59F
01/15 09:27, 59F
→
01/15 11:20, , 60F
01/15 11:20, 60F
推
01/15 14:25, , 61F
01/15 14:25, 61F
→
01/15 16:39, , 62F
01/15 16:39, 62F
推
01/15 20:29, , 63F
01/15 20:29, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):