[閒聊] Ati的驅動跟NV比起來真的是屎渣嗎?
如題
我現在還在用6870耍廢
被我學長嘴到歪頭
真的有如此不堪嗎?
我本來打算換顯卡Cp之王 R9-270的說
但一直被勸退
請問以一下 驅動真的這麼爛嗎?
用跑遊戲來說 Nv真的可以甩Ati這麼多條街嗎?
請板上的前輩們 幫忙解答,感謝
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Sony C6502.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.228.27.30
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/PC_Shopping/M.1444153861.A.C26.html
推
10/07 01:52, , 1F
10/07 01:52, 1F
→
10/07 01:53, , 2F
10/07 01:53, 2F
→
10/07 01:53, , 3F
10/07 01:53, 3F
→
10/07 01:53, , 4F
10/07 01:53, 4F
→
10/07 01:55, , 5F
10/07 01:55, 5F
→
10/07 01:55, , 6F
10/07 01:55, 6F
→
10/07 01:56, , 7F
10/07 01:56, 7F
→
10/07 01:59, , 8F
10/07 01:59, 8F
→
10/07 02:00, , 9F
10/07 02:00, 9F
推
10/07 02:01, , 10F
10/07 02:01, 10F
抱歉,標題是聳動了點,但內文我其實都是用Ati的卡喔
推
10/07 02:02, , 11F
10/07 02:02, 11F
※ 編輯: s29598863 (61.228.27.30), 10/07/2015 02:04:24
推
10/07 02:07, , 12F
10/07 02:07, 12F
→
10/07 02:09, , 13F
10/07 02:09, 13F
推
10/07 02:17, , 14F
10/07 02:17, 14F
推
10/07 02:26, , 15F
10/07 02:26, 15F
推
10/07 02:30, , 16F
10/07 02:30, 16F
→
10/07 02:30, , 17F
10/07 02:30, 17F
→
10/07 02:31, , 18F
10/07 02:31, 18F
推
10/07 02:36, , 19F
10/07 02:36, 19F
→
10/07 02:36, , 20F
10/07 02:36, 20F
→
10/07 02:37, , 21F
10/07 02:37, 21F
→
10/07 02:41, , 22F
10/07 02:41, 22F
推
10/07 02:48, , 23F
10/07 02:48, 23F
→
10/07 03:09, , 24F
10/07 03:09, 24F
推
10/07 03:37, , 25F
10/07 03:37, 25F
推
10/07 03:44, , 26F
10/07 03:44, 26F
推
10/07 06:16, , 27F
10/07 06:16, 27F
推
10/07 06:29, , 28F
10/07 06:29, 28F
→
10/07 06:29, , 29F
10/07 06:29, 29F
推
10/07 06:32, , 30F
10/07 06:32, 30F
推
10/07 07:04, , 31F
10/07 07:04, 31F
→
10/07 07:07, , 32F
10/07 07:07, 32F
推
10/07 07:10, , 33F
10/07 07:10, 33F
→
10/07 07:10, , 34F
10/07 07:10, 34F
推
10/07 07:18, , 35F
10/07 07:18, 35F
→
10/07 07:30, , 36F
10/07 07:30, 36F
→
10/07 07:31, , 37F
10/07 07:31, 37F
還有 48 則推文
→
10/07 12:12, , 86F
10/07 12:12, 86F
→
10/07 12:15, , 87F
10/07 12:15, 87F
→
10/07 12:15, , 88F
10/07 12:15, 88F
→
10/07 12:16, , 89F
10/07 12:16, 89F
推
10/07 12:21, , 90F
10/07 12:21, 90F
推
10/07 12:23, , 91F
10/07 12:23, 91F
→
10/07 12:25, , 92F
10/07 12:25, 92F
→
10/07 12:34, , 93F
10/07 12:34, 93F
推
10/07 12:36, , 94F
10/07 12:36, 94F
→
10/07 12:57, , 95F
10/07 12:57, 95F
→
10/07 12:58, , 96F
10/07 12:58, 96F
推
10/07 13:03, , 97F
10/07 13:03, 97F
→
10/07 13:28, , 98F
10/07 13:28, 98F
→
10/07 13:44, , 99F
10/07 13:44, 99F
→
10/07 13:53, , 100F
10/07 13:53, 100F
推
10/07 14:06, , 101F
10/07 14:06, 101F
推
10/07 14:27, , 102F
10/07 14:27, 102F
→
10/07 14:28, , 103F
10/07 14:28, 103F
推
10/07 14:31, , 104F
10/07 14:31, 104F
推
10/07 15:20, , 105F
10/07 15:20, 105F
推
10/07 15:22, , 106F
10/07 15:22, 106F
推
10/07 15:52, , 107F
10/07 15:52, 107F
推
10/07 16:05, , 108F
10/07 16:05, 108F
→
10/07 16:55, , 109F
10/07 16:55, 109F
推
10/07 16:57, , 110F
10/07 16:57, 110F
推
10/07 17:02, , 111F
10/07 17:02, 111F
→
10/07 17:02, , 112F
10/07 17:02, 112F
推
10/07 18:13, , 113F
10/07 18:13, 113F
推
10/07 18:21, , 114F
10/07 18:21, 114F
推
10/07 18:31, , 115F
10/07 18:31, 115F
推
10/07 18:58, , 116F
10/07 18:58, 116F
推
10/07 19:35, , 117F
10/07 19:35, 117F
→
10/07 19:36, , 118F
10/07 19:36, 118F
推
10/07 20:02, , 119F
10/07 20:02, 119F
→
10/08 16:40, , 120F
10/08 16:40, 120F
推
10/09 02:45, , 121F
10/09 02:45, 121F
→
10/09 18:11, , 122F
10/09 18:11, 122F
→
10/09 18:12, , 123F
10/09 18:12, 123F
→
10/09 18:13, , 124F
10/09 18:13, 124F
→
10/09 20:53, , 125F
10/09 20:53, 125F