[測試]買電腦真的要看需求!! A6-3650 VS I5-24 …
XF好讀版:http://www.xfastest.com/thread-64178-1-1.html
自APU出來之後,電腦硬體搭配的討論就掀起了一陣腥風血雨(?),不少人在討論,究竟AMD APU的菜單定位在哪??
其實當初APU最早出來的用意在於整合CPU & GPU進一顆晶片內,一方面減少功耗,另一方面則是減少硬體佔用空間,這等於大幅提升了筆電的續航力與準系統或是HTPC的效能~
那對於桌機的影響呢? 甚麼樣的需求下購買APU才會是最佳的選擇?
據目前的資訊來看,APU本身的顯示效能以及硬體加速能力都是很強大的,這也帶出了APU本身的定位,但跟競爭對手相比可以達到甚麼程度呢?
我們先來看看A6-3650的效能表現如何吧
3DMark 06
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/6013549219_b1ac830102_b.jpg
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/6013549219_b1ac830102_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6132/6013549289_da2e823e31_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6134/6013549345_518302966a_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6139/6014096832_bd68666e11_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/6014096866_b47699f92d_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6132/6013549517_fb1ca30443_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6002/6013549557_c08eac7d46_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6002/6013549627_2a77751bfa_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6137/6013549697_016a8afea7_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6001/6014097186_9e95cef197_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6128/6014097276_9ff5bbfe34_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6020/6013549999_4c707581e0_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6024/6013550159_e0129cf9d0_b.jpg)
再來看看I社目前最熱賣的CPU-I5-2400的表現吧
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6143/6014102672_7100548bd2_b.jpg
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6143/6014102672_7100548bd2_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6143/6014102728_86d1a25787_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6140/6013555419_e048fa0663_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6004/6014102860_338d8ccaa4_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6030/6013555525_24c245dc8d_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6130/6013555563_d206b94ca8_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6133/6013555607_bba1e623cf_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6005/6014103108_e10f5ec3c6_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6025/6014103242_270ef5d6ec_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6021/6014103448_82fd1caf67_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6014/6013556073_ff1c1d7458_b.jpg)
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6123/6014103522_68822824f5_b.jpg)
其實從3DMark系列就能看出,在DX9上面,A6-3650的效能幾乎已經是I5-2400的兩倍,而DX10則是更多幾乎達到快3倍的差距
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6139/6013556159_efabb46fab_b.jpg
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6139/6013556159_efabb46fab_b.jpg)
遊戲效能的測試設定皆採用1360x768,NoAA,特效全都開到最高,唯獨DiRT3的設定為中,而IE9的測試設定則是在1600x900底下,進行1000 隻與500隻魚的測試,遊戲測試的結果證明了APU顯示效能的強大,對於輕度遊戲玩家來說,解析度不用開到底,特效能夠開到最高或中,APU的效能已經足以滿足需求~對比I5-2400的顯示效能,在惡魔獵人4的項目中,最高差距也快到3倍之多~
至於IE9的測試結果完完全全的讓我理解到APU整體效能的優勢,論硬體加速,IE9算是現階段做的最好也最實用的軟體之一,即便I5-2400本身在CPU上的運算效能很強大,但碰上用IE9進行網頁瀏覽的應用,也只能敗下陣來,一切的原因都在於內建的顯示核心不夠強悍
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6132/6014103590_9e98815dfc_b.jpg
![](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6132/6014103590_9e98815dfc_b.jpg)
看到這邊,大家想必對於APU的定位有一定的認識,其實有不少朋友本身的需求是偶爾玩玩單機或網路遊戲,上上網看影片,購機預算不高,因此也沒有額外購買顯卡的預算(不是每個遊戲玩家有大把的銀子來買顯卡)
在此情況下,與I5-2400相比,A6-3650 會是很好的選擇,從平台預算來看A6-3650比I5-2400少了31%的費用(2190元)
站在上面列出的需求面來看,不難看出A6-3650的CP值何在,以上是小宅的針對APU的定位做的測試分享~希望各位喜歡^^"
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 182.235.168.201
推
08/06 16:53, , 1F
08/06 16:53, 1F
→
08/06 16:53, , 2F
08/06 16:53, 2F
→
08/06 16:57, , 3F
08/06 16:57, 3F
→
08/06 16:57, , 4F
08/06 16:57, 4F
推
08/06 16:58, , 5F
08/06 16:58, 5F
推
08/06 17:14, , 6F
08/06 17:14, 6F
推
08/06 17:27, , 7F
08/06 17:27, 7F
推
08/06 17:34, , 8F
08/06 17:34, 8F
→
08/06 17:35, , 9F
08/06 17:35, 9F
→
08/06 17:36, , 10F
08/06 17:36, 10F
→
08/06 17:37, , 11F
08/06 17:37, 11F
→
08/06 17:37, , 12F
08/06 17:37, 12F
推
08/06 17:45, , 13F
08/06 17:45, 13F
推
08/06 17:52, , 14F
08/06 17:52, 14F
→
08/06 17:52, , 15F
08/06 17:52, 15F
推
08/06 17:56, , 16F
08/06 17:56, 16F
→
08/06 17:56, , 17F
08/06 17:56, 17F
→
08/06 18:02, , 18F
08/06 18:02, 18F
→
08/06 18:48, , 19F
08/06 18:48, 19F
→
08/06 18:48, , 20F
08/06 18:48, 20F
推
08/06 19:42, , 21F
08/06 19:42, 21F
→
08/06 19:49, , 22F
08/06 19:49, 22F
→
08/06 20:05, , 23F
08/06 20:05, 23F
→
08/06 20:08, , 24F
08/06 20:08, 24F
→
08/06 20:09, , 25F
08/06 20:09, 25F
→
08/06 20:13, , 26F
08/06 20:13, 26F
→
08/06 20:17, , 27F
08/06 20:17, 27F
推
08/06 20:27, , 28F
08/06 20:27, 28F
→
08/06 20:28, , 29F
08/06 20:28, 29F
→
08/06 20:29, , 30F
08/06 20:29, 30F
推
08/06 20:31, , 31F
08/06 20:31, 31F
→
08/06 20:31, , 32F
08/06 20:31, 32F
→
08/06 20:34, , 33F
08/06 20:34, 33F
推
08/06 20:52, , 34F
08/06 20:52, 34F
→
08/06 20:53, , 35F
08/06 20:53, 35F
推
08/06 20:59, , 36F
08/06 20:59, 36F
→
08/06 20:59, , 37F
08/06 20:59, 37F
→
08/06 21:01, , 38F
08/06 21:01, 38F
推
08/06 21:24, , 39F
08/06 21:24, 39F
還有 81 則推文
→
08/06 22:36, , 121F
08/06 22:36, 121F
→
08/06 22:37, , 122F
08/06 22:37, 122F
推
08/06 22:42, , 123F
08/06 22:42, 123F
→
08/06 22:42, , 124F
08/06 22:42, 124F
推
08/06 22:44, , 125F
08/06 22:44, 125F
→
08/06 22:49, , 126F
08/06 22:49, 126F
→
08/06 22:50, , 127F
08/06 22:50, 127F
→
08/06 22:50, , 128F
08/06 22:50, 128F
→
08/06 22:59, , 129F
08/06 22:59, 129F
→
08/06 22:59, , 130F
08/06 22:59, 130F
推
08/06 23:02, , 131F
08/06 23:02, 131F
→
08/06 23:04, , 132F
08/06 23:04, 132F
→
08/06 23:04, , 133F
08/06 23:04, 133F
推
08/06 23:08, , 134F
08/06 23:08, 134F
→
08/06 23:14, , 135F
08/06 23:14, 135F
推
08/06 23:14, , 136F
08/06 23:14, 136F
→
08/06 23:15, , 137F
08/06 23:15, 137F
→
08/06 23:16, , 138F
08/06 23:16, 138F
→
08/06 23:17, , 139F
08/06 23:17, 139F
→
08/06 23:17, , 140F
08/06 23:17, 140F
→
08/06 23:19, , 141F
08/06 23:19, 141F
→
08/06 23:21, , 142F
08/06 23:21, 142F
→
08/06 23:21, , 143F
08/06 23:21, 143F
推
08/06 23:23, , 144F
08/06 23:23, 144F
推
08/06 23:25, , 145F
08/06 23:25, 145F
推
08/06 23:27, , 146F
08/06 23:27, 146F
→
08/06 23:28, , 147F
08/06 23:28, 147F
→
08/06 23:28, , 148F
08/06 23:28, 148F
→
08/06 23:32, , 149F
08/06 23:32, 149F
→
08/06 23:34, , 150F
08/06 23:34, 150F
推
08/06 23:35, , 151F
08/06 23:35, 151F
推
08/06 23:40, , 152F
08/06 23:40, 152F
推
08/06 23:55, , 153F
08/06 23:55, 153F
→
08/06 23:55, , 154F
08/06 23:55, 154F
→
08/06 23:56, , 155F
08/06 23:56, 155F
→
08/06 23:57, , 156F
08/06 23:57, 156F
→
08/06 23:58, , 157F
08/06 23:58, 157F
推
08/07 01:50, , 158F
08/07 01:50, 158F
推
08/07 08:28, , 159F
08/07 08:28, 159F
→
08/07 08:29, , 160F
08/07 08:29, 160F