[轉錄]Re: [閒聊]中興生化所的那篇Cell
※ [本文轉錄自 nfsong 信箱]
作者: nfsong.bbs@ptt2.cc (nfsong.bbs@ptt2.cc)
標題: Re: [閒聊]中興生化所的那篇Cell
時間: Thu Nov 23 16:35:02 2006
作者: nfsong.bbs@ptt.cc (nfsong.bbs@ptt.cc)
標題: Re: [閒聊]中興生化所的那篇Cell
時間: Thu Nov 23 16:28:58 2006
作者: lnalna (lnalna) 看板: Biotech
標題: Re: [閒聊]中興生化所的那篇Cell
時間: Tue Nov 21 15:39:43 2006
其實大陸那個網站我們早就知道啦
但是一直都無法登陸
進去寫一些我們的想法
我們老闆曾經寫信給那邊的人
但是我一直沒看到他們把信po上去
我想就po在這裡給大家看
如果誰有辦法上那邊的站
可以幫我們po一下
附帶一點 這個實驗確實是有再現性的
以下為我們老闆寫的信
Dear KL,
Thanks for the concern on our CELL paper. I still want to tell you
that we are very confident with our data and the conclusions we have
drawn for the CELL paper.
I just don't know why some of you guys are so hostile and mean
to us. Some of you guys are even very impolite. I don't know what is the
problem with your ethic education in China. Maybe some of you guys are
professional in handling photoshop to fabricate your own data. But we never
thought of using this kind of trick to modify our data; it is also
unnecessary for us to do this kind thing because we are faithful and
sincere to our work.
I must tell you guys that I have been working in sigma factor for
about 18 years. We have already had the expertises to tackle a lot of
problem in sigma studies. Do you think that only you guys are competent?
The data that we showed on the CELL paper are done by my students; they
have magic hands in handling footprinting and KMnO4-primer extension
analyses. Moreover, the data are reproducible. Don't you think that we
deserve a publication in CELL?
Are you guys experts in this field? If not, how can you guys
judge thing only with your shallow knowledge background and prejudice. If
you are in this field, your actions on the web are disappointing. I feel
pity on you guys. Don't be too proud and confident of yourselves. You never
know what you don't know. If our data and conclusions are finally proved to
be true. Then, what will be your responsibility for accusing us. Can I just
call you scientific criminals because some of you guys deliberately twisted
the truth.
We welcome the constructive discussion but the atittudes of some of
you guys are unacceptable. We don't need to provide any explanation to
you guys. We welcome you to contact the CELL editor. Please just stop
your meaningless dicussion on the web.
張邦彥
教授
中興大學生物化學研究所
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.120.131.12
推
11/21 15:46,
11/21 15:46
→
11/21 15:46,
11/21 15:46
推
11/21 15:56,
11/21 15:56
推
11/21 16:15,
11/21 16:15
推
11/21 16:30,
11/21 16:30
推
11/21 16:36,
11/21 16:36
推
11/21 16:40,
11/21 16:40
推
11/21 16:44,
11/21 16:44
推
11/21 17:10,
11/21 17:10
→
11/21 17:11,
11/21 17:11
→
11/21 17:12,
11/21 17:12
推
11/21 17:41,
11/21 17:41
→
11/21 17:42,
11/21 17:42
推
11/21 18:14,
11/21 18:14
→
11/21 18:15,
11/21 18:15
→
11/21 18:16,
11/21 18:16
推
11/21 18:17,
11/21 18:17
→
11/21 18:18,
11/21 18:18
→
11/21 18:18,
11/21 18:18
→
11/21 18:19,
11/21 18:19
→
11/21 18:20,
11/21 18:20
→
11/21 18:21,
11/21 18:21
→
11/21 18:23,
11/21 18:23
推
11/21 20:03,
11/21 20:03
推
11/22 03:48,
11/22 03:48
→
11/22 03:48,
11/22 03:48
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.114.43.214
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 6 篇):