Re: [討論] 鬥陣特攻 經典或是曇花?你怎麼評價
※ 引述《BrandyEye (單寧瑟)》之銘言:
引言刪
======
記得之前看過有人說"OW是個創新的FPS"
因為它結合了傳統的射擊遊戲以及RPG的特色,不過水能載舟還能煮粥...
剛開始這可能是個吸引玩家的點,畢竟不是每個人都是神槍手
可是在OW裡面大部分人都能找到自己擅長的角色
打靶總是打到鄰兵靶上去的,可以選坦選輔助一樣玩得很開心
只是新鮮感終究會過,就像女朋友終究會走
尤其是賽季一推出之後,大家都發現一個殘忍的事實
想拼賽季的,幾乎都會被"隊伍中必須有坦有輔助贏面才大"這個條件綁死
在這個條件下,大家從本來的很開心變成了不開心
因為系統配對的時候,並不會先問你"是否願意擔任坦角或者輔助角"
這就造成很大的問題....
遊戲一開始,進了六個人,每個人都想要當輸出殺爆對方全家
然後三個想選源氏,三個想選閃光
怎麼辦? 比誰手快囉,然後選不到的剛好今天心情不太好
你不給老子玩我想玩的? 拉弓囉....
或許OW的設計團隊可以參考WOW的方式
打賽季的時候,排隊之前可以先徵詢玩家意見
你願意玩坦玩補還是玩輸出? 甚至有沒有非哪個角不玩的情況?
這樣或許進了遊戲以後,大家各司其職吵架情況會少一些吧?
坦白說,正常人被嘴或是被戳太多次以後,對OW自然會慢慢冷感吧?...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.41.158.116
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/OverWatch/M.1506233949.A.A81.html
推
09/24 14:22, , 1F
09/24 14:22, 1F
推
09/24 14:24, , 2F
09/24 14:24, 2F
→
09/24 14:25, , 3F
09/24 14:25, 3F
推
09/24 14:26, , 4F
09/24 14:26, 4F
→
09/24 14:26, , 5F
09/24 14:26, 5F
→
09/24 14:26, , 6F
09/24 14:26, 6F
推
09/24 14:28, , 7F
09/24 14:28, 7F
推
09/24 14:28, , 8F
09/24 14:28, 8F
→
09/24 14:28, , 9F
09/24 14:28, 9F
→
09/24 14:29, , 10F
09/24 14:29, 10F
→
09/24 14:29, , 11F
09/24 14:29, 11F
→
09/24 14:30, , 12F
09/24 14:30, 12F
噓
09/24 14:32, , 13F
09/24 14:32, 13F
→
09/24 14:32, , 14F
09/24 14:32, 14F
→
09/24 14:33, , 15F
09/24 14:33, 15F
→
09/24 14:34, , 16F
09/24 14:34, 16F
→
09/24 14:35, , 17F
09/24 14:35, 17F
推
09/24 14:49, , 18F
09/24 14:49, 18F
→
09/24 14:49, , 19F
09/24 14:49, 19F
→
09/24 14:50, , 20F
09/24 14:50, 20F
→
09/24 14:51, , 21F
09/24 14:51, 21F
→
09/24 14:51, , 22F
09/24 14:51, 22F
→
09/24 14:51, , 23F
09/24 14:51, 23F
推
09/24 15:19, , 24F
09/24 15:19, 24F
→
09/24 15:19, , 25F
09/24 15:19, 25F
→
09/24 15:19, , 26F
09/24 15:19, 26F
推
09/24 15:22, , 27F
09/24 15:22, 27F
推
09/24 15:30, , 28F
09/24 15:30, 28F
→
09/24 15:30, , 29F
09/24 15:30, 29F
→
09/24 15:31, , 30F
09/24 15:31, 30F
→
09/24 15:31, , 31F
09/24 15:31, 31F
→
09/24 15:31, , 32F
09/24 15:31, 32F
→
09/24 15:31, , 33F
09/24 15:31, 33F
推
09/24 15:58, , 34F
09/24 15:58, 34F
→
09/24 15:58, , 35F
09/24 15:58, 35F
→
09/24 16:02, , 36F
09/24 16:02, 36F
→
09/24 16:02, , 37F
09/24 16:02, 37F
推
09/24 17:41, , 38F
09/24 17:41, 38F
推
09/24 17:48, , 39F
09/24 17:48, 39F
→
09/24 17:49, , 40F
09/24 17:49, 40F
→
09/24 17:49, , 41F
09/24 17:49, 41F
推
09/24 18:29, , 42F
09/24 18:29, 42F
→
09/24 18:29, , 43F
09/24 18:29, 43F
→
09/24 18:29, , 44F
09/24 18:29, 44F
→
09/24 18:29, , 45F
09/24 18:29, 45F
推
09/24 23:03, , 46F
09/24 23:03, 46F
→
09/24 23:03, , 47F
09/24 23:03, 47F
→
09/24 23:09, , 48F
09/24 23:09, 48F
推
09/24 23:51, , 49F
09/24 23:51, 49F
推
09/25 01:28, , 50F
09/25 01:28, 50F
推
09/25 02:39, , 51F
09/25 02:39, 51F
→
09/25 02:39, , 52F
09/25 02:39, 52F
噓
09/25 03:27, , 53F
09/25 03:27, 53F
→
09/25 03:27, , 54F
09/25 03:27, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇):
討論
30
148