Re: [討論] 求你們別再推崇攻擊手爬分了
原文恕刪
根據這個標題也有一個默默的想法
單純有點小心得有感而發
為什麼會有這標題勸大家不要再選攻擊角?
舉凡各大實況主(高Rank)撇除補位以外
Main角幾乎都是攻擊角
這些知名高手為什麼單排雙排幾乎都是攻擊角
(當然也有例外 補位之類的不討論)
原因很簡單 因為這些攻擊角可以Carry自己也carry別人
不需要選了坦補之後還要看團隊內攻擊角臉色決定勝敗
選了攻擊角後可以讓自己好好在攻擊上發揮甚至carry整隊
OW說穿了什麼坦補攻擊 都是相輔相成
但是終究回到比火力 比拳頭大就對了
坦再怎麼強也強也只是很坦 補再怎會補也只是不會死
要贏得勝利就是要"殺掉敵人"
這時就是看攻擊角的臉色了..
最簡單例子就是我和我朋友一個選補一個選坦去雙排
非常看我方攻擊角臉色來吃穿
常常我們連勝的時候都會覺得自己隊友火力好猛
打到一直輸的時候就開始發現 敵人不太死就算火力還強大
講這麼多 如果真心想要爬高Rank
真的需要練一支自己非常熟稔且強力的攻擊角
與其選了坦補看隊友臉色 不如自己練攻擊角強到Carry隊友比較快..
我都跟我朋友開玩笑講
哪天看到Main 小美 萊茵 DVA 慈悲..etc "單排"上Rank80請叫我
真心覺得猛~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.251.244.94
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/OverWatch/M.1470720411.A.A66.html
推
08/09 13:30, , 1F
08/09 13:30, 1F
→
08/09 13:31, , 2F
08/09 13:31, 2F
推
08/09 13:31, , 3F
08/09 13:31, 3F
推
08/09 13:31, , 4F
08/09 13:31, 4F
→
08/09 13:32, , 5F
08/09 13:32, 5F
推
08/09 13:32, , 6F
08/09 13:32, 6F
推
08/09 13:33, , 7F
08/09 13:33, 7F
→
08/09 13:33, , 8F
08/09 13:33, 8F
推
08/09 13:38, , 9F
08/09 13:38, 9F
推
08/09 13:38, , 10F
08/09 13:38, 10F
→
08/09 13:38, , 11F
08/09 13:38, 11F
推
08/09 13:40, , 12F
08/09 13:40, 12F
→
08/09 13:40, , 13F
08/09 13:40, 13F
→
08/09 13:40, , 14F
08/09 13:40, 14F
→
08/09 13:43, , 15F
08/09 13:43, 15F
推
08/09 13:48, , 16F
08/09 13:48, 16F
推
08/09 13:54, , 17F
08/09 13:54, 17F
→
08/09 13:55, , 18F
08/09 13:55, 18F
推
08/09 13:56, , 19F
08/09 13:56, 19F
推
08/09 13:57, , 20F
08/09 13:57, 20F
噓
08/09 14:02, , 21F
08/09 14:02, 21F
推
08/09 14:11, , 22F
08/09 14:11, 22F
→
08/09 14:13, , 23F
08/09 14:13, 23F
→
08/09 14:13, , 24F
08/09 14:13, 24F
推
08/09 14:13, , 25F
08/09 14:13, 25F
推
08/09 14:22, , 26F
08/09 14:22, 26F
→
08/09 14:23, , 27F
08/09 14:23, 27F
→
08/09 14:23, , 28F
08/09 14:23, 28F
→
08/09 14:24, , 29F
08/09 14:24, 29F
推
08/09 14:26, , 30F
08/09 14:26, 30F
→
08/09 14:26, , 31F
08/09 14:26, 31F
推
08/09 14:30, , 32F
08/09 14:30, 32F
推
08/09 14:38, , 33F
08/09 14:38, 33F
→
08/09 14:39, , 34F
08/09 14:39, 34F
推
08/09 14:48, , 35F
08/09 14:48, 35F
推
08/09 14:49, , 36F
08/09 14:49, 36F
→
08/09 14:49, , 37F
08/09 14:49, 37F
推
08/09 14:52, , 38F
08/09 14:52, 38F
→
08/09 14:53, , 39F
08/09 14:53, 39F
→
08/09 14:55, , 40F
08/09 14:55, 40F
推
08/09 14:56, , 41F
08/09 14:56, 41F
→
08/09 14:56, , 42F
08/09 14:56, 42F
→
08/09 14:56, , 43F
08/09 14:56, 43F
→
08/09 14:56, , 44F
08/09 14:56, 44F
推
08/09 14:58, , 45F
08/09 14:58, 45F
→
08/09 14:59, , 46F
08/09 14:59, 46F
→
08/09 14:59, , 47F
08/09 14:59, 47F
→
08/09 15:01, , 48F
08/09 15:01, 48F
→
08/09 15:02, , 49F
08/09 15:02, 49F
推
08/09 15:02, , 50F
08/09 15:02, 50F
→
08/09 15:02, , 51F
08/09 15:02, 51F
→
08/09 15:02, , 52F
08/09 15:02, 52F
→
08/09 15:02, , 53F
08/09 15:02, 53F
→
08/09 15:02, , 54F
08/09 15:02, 54F
→
08/09 15:03, , 55F
08/09 15:03, 55F
→
08/09 15:04, , 56F
08/09 15:04, 56F
→
08/09 15:04, , 57F
08/09 15:04, 57F
→
08/09 15:05, , 58F
08/09 15:05, 58F
→
08/09 15:06, , 59F
08/09 15:06, 59F
→
08/09 15:06, , 60F
08/09 15:06, 60F
推
08/09 15:09, , 61F
08/09 15:09, 61F
→
08/09 15:09, , 62F
08/09 15:09, 62F
→
08/09 15:09, , 63F
08/09 15:09, 63F
→
08/09 15:12, , 64F
08/09 15:12, 64F
推
08/09 15:25, , 65F
08/09 15:25, 65F
推
08/09 15:47, , 66F
08/09 15:47, 66F
→
08/09 15:55, , 67F
08/09 15:55, 67F
→
08/09 15:56, , 68F
08/09 15:56, 68F
→
08/09 15:57, , 69F
08/09 15:57, 69F
→
08/09 15:57, , 70F
08/09 15:57, 70F
→
08/09 16:01, , 71F
08/09 16:01, 71F
→
08/09 16:01, , 72F
08/09 16:01, 72F
→
08/09 16:29, , 73F
08/09 16:29, 73F
→
08/09 16:29, , 74F
08/09 16:29, 74F
推
08/09 16:29, , 75F
08/09 16:29, 75F
→
08/09 16:30, , 76F
08/09 16:30, 76F
→
08/09 16:31, , 77F
08/09 16:31, 77F
推
08/09 17:48, , 78F
08/09 17:48, 78F
推
08/09 17:56, , 79F
08/09 17:56, 79F
推
08/09 18:50, , 80F
08/09 18:50, 80F
推
08/09 19:53, , 81F
08/09 19:53, 81F
→
08/09 20:04, , 82F
08/09 20:04, 82F
推
08/09 20:50, , 83F
08/09 20:50, 83F
推
08/09 21:37, , 84F
08/09 21:37, 84F
→
08/09 21:37, , 85F
08/09 21:37, 85F
推
08/09 23:06, , 86F
08/09 23:06, 86F
推
08/10 10:38, , 87F
08/10 10:38, 87F
推
08/11 04:42, , 88F
08/11 04:42, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 4 篇):
討論
44
162