[問題] 為何大合戰技能都偏向加攻擊力為主?
看了一些大合戰專用技
似乎都是攻擊+XX%
好像沒什麼扣防技?
日版前輩的配法似也是以加攻擊力為主
是因為攻擊高打出來的戰攻會比較高的原因嗎?
現在組個扣防隊 未來大合戰會被打臉打很大嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.254.208.37
→
09/13 23:15, , 1F
09/13 23:15, 1F
推
09/13 23:16, , 2F
09/13 23:16, 2F
→
09/13 23:19, , 3F
09/13 23:19, 3F
→
09/13 23:19, , 4F
09/13 23:19, 4F
→
09/13 23:21, , 5F
09/13 23:21, 5F
→
09/13 23:21, , 6F
09/13 23:21, 6F
→
09/13 23:22, , 7F
09/13 23:22, 7F
→
09/13 23:23, , 8F
09/13 23:23, 8F
→
09/13 23:25, , 9F
09/13 23:25, 9F
→
09/13 23:40, , 10F
09/13 23:40, 10F
因為明明只贏1也是一個圈 贏一百萬也是一個圈
可是大合戰的專用技好像都讓你攻擊突破天際的樣子
所以想說攻擊高有沒有特別用意 例如打到沒人在的城池時分數會比較多之類的?
※ 編輯: pita30 來自: 111.254.208.37 (09/13 23:44)
→
09/13 23:43, , 11F
09/13 23:43, 11F
推
09/13 23:48, , 12F
09/13 23:48, 12F
→
09/13 23:55, , 13F
09/13 23:55, 13F
→
09/13 23:56, , 14F
09/13 23:56, 14F
推
09/14 00:17, , 15F
09/14 00:17, 15F
→
09/14 00:24, , 16F
09/14 00:24, 16F
推
09/14 00:26, , 17F
09/14 00:26, 17F
推
09/14 00:35, , 18F
09/14 00:35, 18F
推
09/14 00:41, , 19F
09/14 00:41, 19F
推
09/14 00:45, , 20F
09/14 00:45, 20F
→
09/14 00:47, , 21F
09/14 00:47, 21F
→
09/14 00:48, , 22F
09/14 00:48, 22F
→
09/14 00:49, , 23F
09/14 00:49, 23F
→
09/14 00:49, , 24F
09/14 00:49, 24F
→
09/14 14:00, , 25F
09/14 14:00, 25F
→
09/14 14:00, , 26F
09/14 14:00, 26F
推
09/14 15:49, , 27F
09/14 15:49, 27F
推
09/14 19:20, , 28F
09/14 19:20, 28F
推
09/14 21:12, , 29F
09/14 21:12, 29F
→
09/14 21:12, , 30F
09/14 21:12, 30F
→
09/14 21:39, , 31F
09/14 21:39, 31F
→
09/14 21:41, , 32F
09/14 21:41, 32F
→
09/14 21:42, , 33F
09/14 21:42, 33F
→
09/14 21:42, , 34F
09/14 21:42, 34F
→
09/14 21:43, , 35F
09/14 21:43, 35F
→
09/14 22:20, , 36F
09/14 22:20, 36F
推
09/14 22:23, , 37F
09/14 22:23, 37F
推
09/14 23:04, , 38F
09/14 23:04, 38F
→
09/14 23:05, , 39F
09/14 23:05, 39F
→
09/14 23:37, , 40F
09/14 23:37, 40F
推
09/15 00:02, , 41F
09/15 00:02, 41F
→
09/15 00:02, , 42F
09/15 00:02, 42F
→
09/15 00:03, , 43F
09/15 00:03, 43F
→
09/15 00:03, , 44F
09/15 00:03, 44F
→
09/15 01:26, , 45F
09/15 01:26, 45F
推
09/15 09:29, , 46F
09/15 09:29, 46F
推
09/15 09:38, , 47F
09/15 09:38, 47F
推
09/15 09:45, , 48F
09/15 09:45, 48F
→
09/15 10:44, , 49F
09/15 10:44, 49F
→
09/15 10:44, , 50F
09/15 10:44, 50F
推
09/15 12:56, , 51F
09/15 12:56, 51F
→
09/15 12:56, , 52F
09/15 12:56, 52F
→
09/15 12:58, , 53F
09/15 12:58, 53F
→
09/15 12:59, , 54F
09/15 12:59, 54F
→
09/15 13:00, , 55F
09/15 13:00, 55F
推
09/15 14:03, , 56F
09/15 14:03, 56F
→
09/15 14:04, , 57F
09/15 14:04, 57F
推
09/15 21:24, , 58F
09/15 21:24, 58F
→
09/15 21:24, , 59F
09/15 21:24, 59F
→
09/15 21:25, , 60F
09/15 21:25, 60F
→
09/15 21:26, , 61F
09/15 21:26, 61F
→
09/15 21:26, , 62F
09/15 21:26, 62F
→
09/15 21:27, , 63F
09/15 21:27, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):