Re: [分享] 草帽一伙最新懸賞金(上色版)
看板ONE_PIECE作者homersimpson (荷馬‧辛普森)時間7年前 (2016/10/03 16:23)推噓-78(5推 83噓 34→)留言122則, 98人參與討論串4/4 (看更多)
: 魯夫 500,000,000 (五億貝里)
: 索龍 320,000,000 (三億兩千萬貝里)
: 娜美 66,000,000 (六千六百萬貝里)
: 騙人布 200,000,000 (兩億貝里)
: 香吉士 177,000,000 (一億七千七百萬貝里)
: 喬巴 100 (一百貝里)
: 羅賓 130,000,000 (一億三千萬貝里)
: 彿朗基 94,000,000 (九千四百萬貝里)
: 布魯克 83,000,000 (八千三百萬貝里)
這賞金根本不合理
(1)娜美光靠一個道具賞金就來到6600萬了
但這個6600萬的娜美,能打贏當初3000萬的魯夫嗎?
我看是不能。
(2)香吉士1億7700萬
六式裡面香吉士只會一招月步,頂多再加一招剃
照劇情的發展我看香吉士之後也會學會嵐腳和霸氣,
但現在連嵐腳和霸氣都還用不出來的這種腳力,賞金就來到1億7,
這1億7能打贏當初當初1億的魯夫嗎? 我看也是不行。
克洛克達爾、多佛朗明哥的賞金不少人都說是低估。
那怎麼草帽一行人的賞金全都是高估? 明顯前後矛盾。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.132.208
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/ONE_PIECE/M.1475482996.A.4CB.html
噓
10/03 16:24, , 1F
10/03 16:24, 1F
噓
10/03 16:24, , 2F
10/03 16:24, 2F
→
10/03 16:26, , 3F
10/03 16:26, 3F
→
10/03 16:26, , 4F
10/03 16:26, 4F
→
10/03 16:29, , 5F
10/03 16:29, 5F
這都是讀者事後自己解釋的
從漫畫內容中根本得不出這個結論
※ 編輯: homersimpson (1.165.132.208), 10/03/2016 16:32:00
噓
10/03 16:33, , 6F
10/03 16:33, 6F
→
10/03 16:33, , 7F
10/03 16:33, 7F
噓
10/03 16:39, , 8F
10/03 16:39, 8F
→
10/03 16:39, , 9F
10/03 16:39, 9F
→
10/03 16:40, , 10F
10/03 16:40, 10F
噓
10/03 16:42, , 11F
10/03 16:42, 11F
→
10/03 16:43, , 12F
10/03 16:43, 12F
→
10/03 16:44, , 13F
10/03 16:44, 13F
→
10/03 16:44, , 14F
10/03 16:44, 14F
噓
10/03 16:44, , 15F
10/03 16:44, 15F
→
10/03 16:44, , 16F
10/03 16:44, 16F
→
10/03 16:45, , 17F
10/03 16:45, 17F
→
10/03 16:48, , 18F
10/03 16:48, 18F
→
10/03 16:51, , 19F
10/03 16:51, 19F
→
10/03 17:05, , 20F
10/03 17:05, 20F
噓
10/03 17:07, , 21F
10/03 17:07, 21F
推
10/03 17:08, , 22F
10/03 17:08, 22F
→
10/03 17:08, , 23F
10/03 17:08, 23F
噓
10/03 17:10, , 24F
10/03 17:10, 24F
噓
10/03 17:10, , 25F
10/03 17:10, 25F
噓
10/03 17:11, , 26F
10/03 17:11, 26F
噓
10/03 17:19, , 27F
10/03 17:19, 27F
噓
10/03 17:45, , 28F
10/03 17:45, 28F
推
10/03 17:48, , 29F
10/03 17:48, 29F
→
10/03 17:49, , 30F
10/03 17:49, 30F
→
10/03 17:50, , 31F
10/03 17:50, 31F
推
10/03 17:57, , 32F
10/03 17:57, 32F
噓
10/03 17:59, , 33F
10/03 17:59, 33F
噓
10/03 18:20, , 34F
10/03 18:20, 34F
噓
10/03 18:48, , 35F
10/03 18:48, 35F
噓
10/03 18:50, , 36F
10/03 18:50, 36F
噓
10/03 19:06, , 37F
10/03 19:06, 37F
→
10/03 19:06, , 38F
10/03 19:06, 38F
還有 44 則推文
噓
10/04 10:46, , 83F
10/04 10:46, 83F
噓
10/04 10:53, , 84F
10/04 10:53, 84F
→
10/04 11:28, , 85F
10/04 11:28, 85F
噓
10/04 11:52, , 86F
10/04 11:52, 86F
噓
10/04 12:03, , 87F
10/04 12:03, 87F
噓
10/04 13:41, , 88F
10/04 13:41, 88F
噓
10/04 14:02, , 89F
10/04 14:02, 89F
噓
10/04 18:01, , 90F
10/04 18:01, 90F
噓
10/04 18:34, , 91F
10/04 18:34, 91F
噓
10/04 20:13, , 92F
10/04 20:13, 92F
噓
10/04 21:30, , 93F
10/04 21:30, 93F
噓
10/04 21:41, , 94F
10/04 21:41, 94F
噓
10/04 21:53, , 95F
10/04 21:53, 95F
→
10/04 22:49, , 96F
10/04 22:49, 96F
噓
10/05 00:46, , 97F
10/05 00:46, 97F
噓
10/05 00:53, , 98F
10/05 00:53, 98F
噓
10/05 01:11, , 99F
10/05 01:11, 99F
噓
10/05 08:12, , 100F
10/05 08:12, 100F
噓
10/05 09:07, , 101F
10/05 09:07, 101F
噓
10/05 11:36, , 102F
10/05 11:36, 102F
推
10/05 12:01, , 103F
10/05 12:01, 103F
噓
10/05 13:52, , 104F
10/05 13:52, 104F
→
10/05 13:53, , 105F
10/05 13:53, 105F
→
10/05 13:53, , 106F
10/05 13:53, 106F
噓
10/05 14:09, , 107F
10/05 14:09, 107F
噓
10/05 15:15, , 108F
10/05 15:15, 108F
→
10/05 21:23, , 109F
10/05 21:23, 109F
噓
10/06 08:02, , 110F
10/06 08:02, 110F
→
10/06 08:03, , 111F
10/06 08:03, 111F
推
10/06 10:47, , 112F
10/06 10:47, 112F
噓
10/06 11:29, , 113F
10/06 11:29, 113F
噓
10/06 12:00, , 114F
10/06 12:00, 114F
噓
10/06 16:18, , 115F
10/06 16:18, 115F
噓
10/07 16:34, , 116F
10/07 16:34, 116F
噓
10/07 18:44, , 117F
10/07 18:44, 117F
噓
10/08 14:48, , 118F
10/08 14:48, 118F
噓
10/08 23:58, , 119F
10/08 23:58, 119F
噓
10/11 11:12, , 120F
10/11 11:12, 120F
噓
10/11 23:05, , 121F
10/11 23:05, 121F
噓
10/13 09:26, , 122F
10/13 09:26, 122F
討論串 (同標題文章)