[討論] Chamberlain的角色?
美國YES電視台專欄作家培斯勒(Jerome Preisler)直截了當的表示,
張伯倫絕對是洋基目前最適合且最有能力,
在未來接替守護神的人選
然後wang就可以回先發輪值
張博倫倘若是佈局投手
感覺上比較有威脅性
當然最近的先發也都表現的不錯
但是以長遠及整體戰績來看
佈局投手是否比較適合他呢???
順道一提
他球速是否有所下降呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 163.30.209.39
推
06/02 13:56, , 1F
06/02 13:56, 1F
→
06/02 13:57, , 2F
06/02 13:57, 2F
→
06/02 13:58, , 3F
06/02 13:58, 3F
→
06/02 13:58, , 4F
06/02 13:58, 4F
推
06/02 13:59, , 5F
06/02 13:59, 5F
推
06/02 13:59, , 6F
06/02 13:59, 6F
→
06/02 13:59, , 7F
06/02 13:59, 7F
推
06/02 14:01, , 8F
06/02 14:01, 8F
推
06/02 14:01, , 9F
06/02 14:01, 9F
→
06/02 14:02, , 10F
06/02 14:02, 10F
推
06/02 14:06, , 11F
06/02 14:06, 11F
→
06/02 14:06, , 12F
06/02 14:06, 12F
推
06/02 14:07, , 13F
06/02 14:07, 13F
推
06/02 14:07, , 14F
06/02 14:07, 14F
推
06/02 14:08, , 15F
06/02 14:08, 15F
推
06/02 14:09, , 16F
06/02 14:09, 16F
→
06/02 14:09, , 17F
06/02 14:09, 17F
→
06/02 14:09, , 18F
06/02 14:09, 18F
→
06/02 14:09, , 19F
06/02 14:09, 19F
推
06/02 14:10, , 20F
06/02 14:10, 20F
→
06/02 14:10, , 21F
06/02 14:10, 21F
推
06/02 14:13, , 22F
06/02 14:13, 22F
→
06/02 14:14, , 23F
06/02 14:14, 23F
→
06/02 14:15, , 24F
06/02 14:15, 24F
推
06/02 14:16, , 25F
06/02 14:16, 25F
推
06/02 14:17, , 26F
06/02 14:17, 26F
推
06/02 14:23, , 27F
06/02 14:23, 27F
推
06/02 14:23, , 28F
06/02 14:23, 28F
推
06/02 14:23, , 29F
06/02 14:23, 29F
→
06/02 14:25, , 30F
06/02 14:25, 30F
推
06/02 14:26, , 31F
06/02 14:26, 31F
→
06/02 14:26, , 32F
06/02 14:26, 32F
推
06/02 14:30, , 33F
06/02 14:30, 33F
推
06/02 14:32, , 34F
06/02 14:32, 34F
→
06/02 14:33, , 35F
06/02 14:33, 35F
推
06/02 14:38, , 36F
06/02 14:38, 36F
推
06/02 14:39, , 37F
06/02 14:39, 37F
推
06/02 14:41, , 38F
06/02 14:41, 38F
推
06/02 14:46, , 39F
06/02 14:46, 39F
→
06/02 14:48, , 40F
06/02 14:48, 40F
→
06/02 14:53, , 41F
06/02 14:53, 41F
推
06/02 14:53, , 42F
06/02 14:53, 42F
→
06/02 14:54, , 43F
06/02 14:54, 43F
→
06/02 14:59, , 44F
06/02 14:59, 44F
→
06/02 15:01, , 45F
06/02 15:01, 45F
→
06/02 15:05, , 46F
06/02 15:05, 46F
推
06/02 15:07, , 47F
06/02 15:07, 47F
→
06/02 15:07, , 48F
06/02 15:07, 48F
推
06/02 15:08, , 49F
06/02 15:08, 49F
→
06/02 15:08, , 50F
06/02 15:08, 50F
推
06/02 15:25, , 51F
06/02 15:25, 51F
→
06/02 15:25, , 52F
06/02 15:25, 52F
→
06/02 15:26, , 53F
06/02 15:26, 53F
→
06/02 15:27, , 54F
06/02 15:27, 54F
→
06/02 15:27, , 55F
06/02 15:27, 55F
推
06/02 15:29, , 56F
06/02 15:29, 56F
推
06/02 15:30, , 57F
06/02 15:30, 57F
→
06/02 15:30, , 58F
06/02 15:30, 58F
推
06/02 15:35, , 59F
06/02 15:35, 59F
推
06/02 15:38, , 60F
06/02 15:38, 60F
推
06/02 16:13, , 61F
06/02 16:13, 61F
→
06/02 16:14, , 62F
06/02 16:14, 62F
推
06/02 16:27, , 63F
06/02 16:27, 63F
推
06/02 16:39, , 64F
06/02 16:39, 64F
推
06/02 17:11, , 65F
06/02 17:11, 65F
推
06/02 17:37, , 66F
06/02 17:37, 66F
推
06/02 18:00, , 67F
06/02 18:00, 67F
推
06/02 18:19, , 68F
06/02 18:19, 68F
推
06/02 18:22, , 69F
06/02 18:22, 69F
推
06/02 18:36, , 70F
06/02 18:36, 70F
→
06/02 18:39, , 71F
06/02 18:39, 71F
推
06/02 21:47, , 72F
06/02 21:47, 72F
推
06/02 21:49, , 73F
06/02 21:49, 73F
推
06/02 23:14, , 74F
06/02 23:14, 74F
推
06/03 00:22, , 75F
06/03 00:22, 75F
→
06/03 00:22, , 76F
06/03 00:22, 76F
推
06/03 02:09, , 77F
06/03 02:09, 77F
→
06/03 02:09, , 78F
06/03 02:09, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)