[Wang] What’s wrong with Chien-Ming Wang?
http://tinyurl.com/cxq6gp
The Yanks are buried 2.5 games back of the first place Blue Jays with only
155 games left to play (/hyperbole), but perhaps the biggest problem facing
them right now is Chien-Ming Wang. The incumbent ace has been absolutely
brutal in his two starts this year, allowing (gulp) 21 baserunners and 15
earned runs in just four and two-third innings pitched. That makes Sidney
Ponson look like Roy frickin’ Halladay. The more troubling part is how Wang
just doesn’t look like himself at all; his pitches are all up in the zone,
his velocity is down, and his sinker isn’t sinking.
This might not be something that just started last week either. Wang had a
1.56 WHIP and a 6.00 ERA in his previous six starts before lisfrancing his
foot last summer, suggesting that something might have been wrong going back
as far as last year. Of course that ten month layoff doesn’t help any, but
we can still look at the data to see if we can find anything. Wang did have a
good but not great Spring Training (21.2 IP, 25 H, 16 R, 10 ER, 4 BB, 10 K, 3
HR), however no one in their right mind would use Spring Training stats to
evaluate anything, especially for a player with a signficant track record.
Let’s compare three versions of Chien-Ming Wang using Pitch f/x:
1. Pre-May 18th, 2008: This was the light’s out CMW last year, when he
had a 2.90 ERA and a 1.17 WHIP through his first nine starts and 59 IP.
2. Post-May 18th, 2008: Wang had his first of a series of clunkers on May
18th last year, which marks the point of that 6.00 ERA/1.56 WHIP era I
mentioned earlier. I fail at labeling, but this version includes his May
18th start.
3. 2009: This year’s pair of starts, i.e. the really, really crappy
version of CMW.
I’m going to focus on Wang’s two main pitches in this analysis: his sinking
fastball and slider. He’s also been known to throw changeups, splitters, and
even the occasional curveball, but because he throws them so rarely it’s not
worth the time and effort to take a deeper look at them. I’m going to start
with the pitch trajectories as always, and to make life easier I gave
fastballs and sliders their own individual graphs. Make sure you remember to
click each graph for a larger, squinting at a computer screen has to be bad
for your eyes.
Fun starts after the jump.
Looking at the fastballs first, you can see that the horizontal release point
of the three versions are different, but the pitches typically end up at the
same spot. That means that the post-May 18th fastball has less movement than
the pre-May 18th version, and the 2009 version has even less movement than
that. That’s not good, Wang’s a guy who needs his fastball to dart and dive
and all that jazz. You can also see that his ‘09 slider isn’t moving as
much as the ‘08 versions.
Now, the look as if you were standing at first base:
This view shows is that Wang is releasing both pitches from a higher spot
this year than he did last. The fastball still has vertical drop, but it’s
not moving horizontally as much, which you can see in the bird’s eye look.
Let’s take a look from the catcher’s view:
More than anything, this view just gives you a different look at the above.
His pitches are still moving vertically in a way similar to last year, but
they definitely don’t have the same kind of side-to-side movement. To
further drive home that point:
I haven’t posted one of these movement plots on RAB yet, so let me explain.
It’s simple, don’t worry. The x-axis shows the horizontal movement of the
pitch with 0 meaning it’s straight as an arrow. A negative value means the
pitch moves in on righties, a positive value means it moves in on lefties.
The y-axis is the vertical movement of the pitch compared to a ball thrown
with zero spin. Fastballs have big numbers because they have more carry on
them then this mythical zero rotation pitch, but breaking balls have small
numbers because they move more. Curveballs are usually in the negatives, as
are super elite sliders (think Brad Lidge). The units in this graph are
inches.
So, from this you can see that his fastball still has the same kind of
vertical movement as last year, but it’s just not riding as hard
horizontally. The slider’s dropping a bit more but not moving as much
horizontally as last year. All of this is consistent with everything
presented above. These trajectory and movement plots are fun to look at, but
all they really show are results, the results of his pitching motion, and
apparently that’s the problem. From Pete Abe:
Wang seemed stunned. He said the issue was where he released the ball,
which was off to the side instead of over the top. A sinkerball pitcher
wants to stand tall on the mound and throw the ball on a downward plane.
Otherwise the ball floats over the strike zone and you see what happens.
That sounds good and make sense, but the data doesn’t agree. Here’s a look
at Wang’s release points:
If you haven’t seen these before, make sure you read RAB more often the
point 0,0 is the center of the front of home plate, so the x-axis shows you
how far away from the middle of the plate you are, and the y-axis shows you
how far you are above the ground. Now, there’s a couple things going on
here. First of all, those post-May 18th points that are mixed in with the
pre-May 18th points are scattered over several starts. It’s not like all
those pitches came from one or two starts, they’re spread out over all six
starts. Secondly, it’s very likely that the difference in the general
horizontal location of the pitches is caused by Wang move more towards the
first base side of the rubber, but we’re focusing on the vertical location
since Wang said he wanted to come more over the top.
In general, Wang’s throwing the ball from a spot about six inches higher
this year than he did last year, no matter if you consider the good ‘08 Wang
or the bad ‘08 Wang. That contradicts what he said after the game, but that
doesn’t mean he’s lying or the data’s wrong. It’s entirely possible that
he wants to release the ball from an even higher spot than he currently is,
but I have to ask why? I mean, if throwing it from a slightly lower slot
worked last year, why change it? I’m no pitching coach or pitching mechanics
expert, so I won’t even attempt to answer those questions. All I do know is
that for some reason Wang is releasing the ball from a higher spot than last
year and yet he still wants to come even more over the top.
Finally, lets take a look at his velocity, because it’s definitely been down
this year.
That graphs encompassed a ton of pitches, 1,227 to be exact. Last year he was
sitting at 91-93 pretty consistently, except for that one start which was
probably a dead arm thing considering it was preceded by a spike in velocity
(maybe he was overthrowing in a big start and wore himself down). This year
Wang is sitting only 89-91, a small but definitely notable drop. This could
be from bad mechanics, a dead arm period, injury, or about a million other
things. The team already shot down injury and said it was just a mechanical
issue, and I believe them because Wang didn’t appear to be in any obvious
pain, he was more disgusted with himself.
I don’t know what’s wrong with Chien-Ming Wang, but whatever it is, it’s
causing him to lose movement on his pitches as well as velocity. Maybe it’s
just rust from the long injury layoff. Disirregardless, I hope he gets
himself straightened out sooner rather than later. The cool part about the ‘
09 Yanks is that even though CMW is struggling, they can still trot out four
quality starters. When’s the last time we could say that?
--
看來王葛格的低潮有可能是因為出手點太高的關係，導致伸卡球橫向位移不足
和我之前看轉播猜測的一樣
(葛格出手姿勢真的有改變的感覺，好像有點拉太快又太高的樣子，出手時也有刻意下壓)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.5.3
推
04/15 18:52, , 1F
04/15 18:52, 1F
推
04/15 18:53, , 2F
04/15 18:53, 2F
推
04/15 18:54, , 3F
04/15 18:54, 3F
推
04/15 18:54, , 4F
04/15 18:54, 4F
→
04/15 18:54, , 5F
04/15 18:54, 5F
→
04/15 18:55, , 6F
04/15 18:55, 6F
→
04/15 18:55, , 7F
04/15 18:55, 7F
→
04/15 18:55, , 8F
04/15 18:55, 8F
→
04/15 18:56, , 9F
04/15 18:56, 9F
→
04/15 18:56, , 10F
04/15 18:56, 10F
→
04/15 18:57, , 11F
04/15 18:57, 11F
→
04/15 18:57, , 12F
04/15 18:57, 12F
→
04/15 18:59, , 13F
04/15 18:59, 13F
→
04/15 18:59, , 14F
04/15 18:59, 14F
推
04/15 19:00, , 15F
04/15 19:00, 15F
→
04/15 19:01, , 16F
04/15 19:01, 16F
→
04/15 19:02, , 17F
04/15 19:02, 17F
→
04/15 19:02, , 18F
04/15 19:02, 18F
推
04/15 19:02, , 19F
04/15 19:02, 19F
→
04/15 19:04, , 20F
04/15 19:04, 20F
→
04/15 19:06, , 21F
04/15 19:06, 21F
→
04/15 19:06, , 22F
04/15 19:06, 22F
→
04/15 19:07, , 23F
04/15 19:07, 23F
→
04/15 19:07, , 24F
04/15 19:07, 24F
→
04/15 19:07, , 25F
04/15 19:07, 25F
→
04/15 19:08, , 26F
04/15 19:08, 26F
→
04/15 19:08, , 27F
04/15 19:08, 27F
→
04/15 19:08, , 28F
04/15 19:08, 28F
→
04/15 19:10, , 29F
04/15 19:10, 29F
推
04/15 19:10, , 30F
04/15 19:10, 30F
推
04/15 19:11, , 31F
04/15 19:11, 31F
→
04/15 19:11, , 32F
04/15 19:11, 32F
→
04/15 19:12, , 33F
04/15 19:12, 33F
→
04/15 19:12, , 34F
04/15 19:12, 34F
→
04/15 19:14, , 35F
04/15 19:14, 35F
推
04/15 19:42, , 36F
04/15 19:42, 36F
→
04/15 19:54, , 37F
04/15 19:54, 37F
推
04/15 20:00, , 38F
04/15 20:00, 38F
推
04/15 20:07, , 39F
04/15 20:07, 39F
推
04/15 20:08, , 40F
04/15 20:08, 40F
推
04/15 20:08, , 41F
04/15 20:08, 41F
→
04/15 20:11, , 42F
04/15 20:11, 42F
→
04/15 20:11, , 43F
04/15 20:11, 43F
→
04/15 20:12, , 44F
04/15 20:12, 44F
→
04/15 20:15, , 45F
04/15 20:15, 45F
→
04/15 20:16, , 46F
04/15 20:16, 46F
推
04/15 20:27, , 47F
04/15 20:27, 47F
推
04/15 20:32, , 48F
04/15 20:32, 48F
推
04/15 20:33, , 49F
04/15 20:33, 49F
推
04/15 20:35, , 50F
04/15 20:35, 50F
推
04/15 20:40, , 51F
04/15 20:40, 51F
推
04/15 21:33, , 52F
04/15 21:33, 52F
→
04/15 21:35, , 53F
04/15 21:35, 53F
→
04/15 21:36, , 54F
04/15 21:36, 54F
推
04/15 22:31, , 55F
04/15 22:31, 55F
→
04/15 23:37, , 56F
04/15 23:37, 56F
推
04/15 23:42, , 57F
04/15 23:42, 57F
推
04/15 23:46, , 58F
04/15 23:46, 58F
→
04/15 23:51, , 59F
04/15 23:51, 59F
→
04/15 23:51, , 60F
04/15 23:51, 60F
推
04/16 00:16, , 61F
04/16 00:16, 61F
→
04/16 00:17, , 62F
04/16 00:17, 62F
推
04/16 00:46, , 63F
04/16 00:46, 63F
推
04/16 02:23, , 64F
04/16 02:23, 64F
→
04/16 02:24, , 65F
04/16 02:24, 65F
推
04/16 03:24, , 66F
04/16 03:24, 66F
→
04/16 03:25, , 67F
04/16 03:25, 67F
→
04/16 03:25, , 68F
04/16 03:25, 68F