Re: [洋基] Just how good is Mark Teixeira?
※ 引述《appshjkli (Red Spider Lily)》之銘言:
: 標題: [洋基] Just how good is Mark Teixeira?
: 時間: Fri Jan 2 00:27:36 2009
:
:
: http://www.nomaas.org/
:
: 12.27.2008 Just how good is Mark Teixeira?
:
: There has been a lot of dispute since Mark Teixeira agreed to terms with the
:
: Yankees about what type of player he really is. People like to downplay the
:
: signing by saying that he isn't "elite" or that his numbers come from a
:
: position (first base) where they aren’t anything special. Without even
:
: considering defensive contributions, we can use VORP to compare Tex
:
: offensively to other first baseman over the last two years. Remember, VORP
:
: is a counting stat, so we've included games played and VORP rate (VORPr) to
:
: help add more clarity.
鐵爺一來大家就吵不停。很多人唱衰他不是"菁英",或是說以一個一壘手而言他沒什
麼鳥不起。那我們就忽略手套只看棒子吧,用VORP和VORPr來看看在這兩年啾勁如何。
: VORP Games Played VORPr
:
: Pujols 170.7 306 .558
: Texeira 118.3 289 .409
: Berkman 115.2 312 .369
:
: Fielder 109.7 317 .346
:
: Pena 101.2 287 .353
:
: Howard 90.0 306 .294
:
: Youkilis 84.7 290 .292
:
: Gonzalez 83.5 323 .258
:
: Morneau 75.9 320 .237
:
:
: So, in a group where offensive production is held to a higher standard,
:
: Teixeira is the second most valuable offensive player over the course of the
:
: last two full seasons. When adjusting for the number of games played, he
:
: separates himself even more.
過去兩年的一壘手只有撲吼獅比鐵爺猛。
: Taking it a step further, over the same two-year period Teixeira has the 8th
:
: highest VORP total of any hitter in baseball. This should be especially
:
: amusing to those that claim he somehow isn’t worth his contract because he
:
: is a first baseman, since the numbers are adjusted for position. We’ll
:
: repeat that just to make certain that it’s clear: over the last two seasons,
:
: only Pujols, Hanley Ramirez, A-Rod, Chipper, Wright, Utley, and Holliday have
:
: been more productive offensively when adjusting for positional scarcity.
:
就算和全部的人比鐵爺也還是老八,這可以拿來恥笑那些只因鐵爺是一壘手就認為他
不值這份合約的鄉民。過去兩年只有七個火星人比他威。
: If we look simply at offensive production with no regard for position,
:
: Teixeira is tied for the 4th highest OPS+ in all of baseball (151) over the
:
: last two years. Only Pujols, Chipper, and A-Rod are ahead of him, with Ortiz
:
: posting the same 151. If we take it back to a period of four years, he is
:
: still ranked extremely high, coming in at 11th highest. The beautiful thing
:
: here is that Teixeira has been trending upward, increasing his walk rate and
:
: decreasing his strikeouts.
:
如果只看棒子威能,過去兩年鐵爺的OPS+排行老四。只有三個神樣比他猛,老爹只和他
打平。如果我們看的四年,他還是排在第十一,超猛!爽得是鐵爺還再長大,保送越來
越多,三振越來越少。
: Having said all of this, can we please stop with the foolish idea that just
:
: because Teixeira isn’t the best at his position right now, he somehow isn’t
:
: a great, or possibly elite, offensive producer? Currently, the best at his
:
: position is a generational player. Mark Teixeira is not that type of
:
: producer, but it’s quite clear that he is among the best that MLB has to
:
: offer at the present time.
鄉民們醒醒吧!只因為他不是第一名你們就唱衰他嗎?當下也只有一個百年難得一見
的超級賽亞人比他猛啊!鐵爺不是超級賽亞人,但很明顯的,當前他是最好的幾個傢
伙之一。
:
: 12.28.2008 Just how good is Mark Teixeira? Part II
:
:
: We showed you how valuable Mark Teixeira is offensively. He is a premiere
:
: hitter, no matter how a certain fanbase may be trying to spin it. However,
: for we Yankee fans who have been used to seeing Jason Giambi lumber his way
:
: around the bag, it would be useful to see how Teixeira fairs defensively as
:
: well.
:
我們已經看過鐵爺的棒子有多好了。更值得洋基迷慶幸的是,鐵爺的防守鐵定比吃力
地搖著大屁股的大吉好。
: According to the Hardball Times' Revised Zone Rating, Teixeira converted
:
: 83.4% of balls hit in his zone into outs during 2008. That was second among
:
: qualified 1B, only behind Albert Pujols.
:
: Giambi in 2008? 67.9%
:
: Talk about a huge freakin' upgrade.
在2008打進鐵爺結界的球,有83.4%都被換成出局數了。還是只有撲吼獅比他猛。
你問大吉?67.9%冏
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 218.166.148.61
※ 編輯: griffonshen 來自: 218.166.148.61 (01/02 01:51)
推
01/02 01:53, , 1F
01/02 01:53, 1F
※ 編輯: griffonshen 來自: 218.166.148.61 (01/02 01:54)
推
01/02 02:08, , 2F
01/02 02:08, 2F
→
01/02 02:09, , 3F
01/02 02:09, 3F
→
01/02 02:27, , 4F
01/02 02:27, 4F
推
01/02 02:40, , 5F
01/02 02:40, 5F
推
01/02 02:41, , 6F
01/02 02:41, 6F
→
01/02 02:42, , 7F
01/02 02:42, 7F
→
01/02 02:43, , 8F
01/02 02:43, 8F
推
01/02 02:43, , 9F
01/02 02:43, 9F
推
01/02 02:52, , 10F
01/02 02:52, 10F
→
01/02 02:53, , 11F
01/02 02:53, 11F
→
01/02 02:54, , 12F
01/02 02:54, 12F
→
01/02 02:55, , 13F
01/02 02:55, 13F
推
01/02 02:59, , 14F
01/02 02:59, 14F
→
01/02 03:00, , 15F
01/02 03:00, 15F
推
01/02 03:12, , 16F
01/02 03:12, 16F
→
01/02 03:12, , 17F
01/02 03:12, 17F
推
01/02 03:22, , 18F
01/02 03:22, 18F
推
01/02 07:17, , 19F
01/02 07:17, 19F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):