Re: [討論] Edwar Ramirez 在 AAA 與 MLB 的差別
列一下 Edwar Ramirez 上MLB的各項數據
DATE GAME W L ERA G GS SV SVO IP H R/ER HR BB SO NP-S GO-AO
JUL 03 MIN 0 0 0.00 1 0 0 0 1.0 0 0/0 0 0 3 14-9 0-0
JUL 06 LAA 1 0 3.86 1 0 0 1 1.1 2 1/1 0 1 1 23-14 2-0
JUL 20 TB 0 0 15.43 1 0 0 0 0.0 1 3/3 1 4 0 19-2 0-0
July Total: 1 0 15.43 3 0 0 1 2.1 3 4/4 1 5 4 56-25 2-0
AUG 15 BAL 0 0 7.71 1 0 0 0 2.1 1 0/0 0 0 3 25-19 2-2
AUG 19 DET 0 0 5.40 1 0 1 1 2.0 0 0/0 0 0 3 22-13 0-3
AUG 21 @LAA 0 0 6.23 1 0 0 0 2.0 4 2/2 1 1 4 41-28 1-1
AUG 24 @DET 0 0 5.59 1 0 0 0 1.0 0 0/0 0 1 1 18-10 1-1
AUG 27 @DET 0 0 5.91 1 0 0 0 1.0 1 1/1 1 1 1 23-11 1-1
AUG 30 BOS 0 0 5.56 1 0 0 0 0.2 0 0/0 0 0 1 10-7 0-1
August Total:0 0 3.00 6 0 1 1 9.0 6 3/3 2 3 13 139-88 5-9
SEP 02 TB 0 0 7.11 1 0 0 0 1.1 3 3/3 2 0 3 21-16 0-1
SEP 05 SEA 0 0 6.59 1 0 0 0 1.0 0 0/0 0 0 1 13-9 2-0
SEP 08 @KC 0 0 6.28 1 0 0 0 0.2 1 0/0 0 0 0 7-7 1-1
Septem Total:0 0 9.00 3 0 0 0 3.0 4 3/3 2 0 4 41-32 3-2
W-L ERA G GS SV SVO IP H R/ER HR HBP BB SO
Career Totals 1-0 6.28 12 0 1 2 14.1 13 10/10 5 1 8 21
ERA IP H R/ER HR HBP BB SO
vs Left-handed Batter 12.60 5.0 6 7/7 3 0 6 7
vs Right-handed Batter 2.89 9.1 7 3/3 2 1 2 14
首先是球種滿單調的,就算change up再猛,也只有2選1的球路,打者只挑直球打也沒
輒,畢竟他的直球只有90~92mile,這在MLB中不算火球程度,很難造成威脅。
對右打者的壓制不錯,但可能是身材因素致使球尾勁不夠,仍然容易挨轟;而對左打
更是苦手許多,主要在於BB和長打太多。
個人認為穩定出賽是一個重點,除了冰太久大爆炸那場外,沒有一場比賽超過1個BB,
這可以當作他球感還在控球就穩的表現,若只看1局內的投球表現,其表現也算稱職。但其
球種、實力可能殺不過MLB的頂級打者,作為中繼也只能堪稱中規中矩,如果能多練好1種
以上的球路,未來的威脅應該會更大。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.224.89.143
推
09/09 18:30, , 1F
09/09 18:30, 1F
推
09/09 18:33, , 2F
09/09 18:33, 2F
推
09/09 18:34, , 3F
09/09 18:34, 3F
推
09/09 18:34, , 4F
09/09 18:34, 4F
→
09/09 18:34, , 5F
09/09 18:34, 5F
推
09/09 18:38, , 6F
09/09 18:38, 6F
推
09/09 18:48, , 7F
09/09 18:48, 7F
→
09/09 18:49, , 8F
09/09 18:49, 8F
→
09/09 18:50, , 9F
09/09 18:50, 9F
推
09/09 18:51, , 10F
09/09 18:51, 10F
→
09/09 18:52, , 11F
09/09 18:52, 11F
推
09/09 18:55, , 12F
09/09 18:55, 12F
推
09/09 19:20, , 13F
09/09 19:20, 13F
→
09/09 19:20, , 14F
09/09 19:20, 14F
→
09/09 19:21, , 15F
09/09 19:21, 15F
→
09/09 19:21, , 16F
09/09 19:21, 16F
推
09/09 19:33, , 17F
09/09 19:33, 17F
→
09/09 19:34, , 18F
09/09 19:34, 18F
推
09/09 19:57, , 19F
09/09 19:57, 19F
推
09/09 20:31, , 20F
09/09 20:31, 20F
推
09/09 20:48, , 21F
09/09 20:48, 21F
→
09/09 20:49, , 22F
09/09 20:49, 22F
→
09/09 20:51, , 23F
09/09 20:51, 23F
→
09/09 20:51, , 24F
09/09 20:51, 24F
→
09/09 20:54, , 25F
09/09 20:54, 25F
推
09/09 22:28, , 26F
09/09 22:28, 26F
推
09/10 00:11, , 27F
09/10 00:11, 27F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):