[校園] 有關性別友善廁所一問
小弟今天在活大社辦耍冗時
想去拉個屎
但意外的發現二樓男廁居然不見了,取而代之的是一間性別友善廁所
原本三個小便斗三個馬桶改建成兩個小便斗兩個馬桶
然後都在使用中
小弟只好再去另尋乾淨的馬桶了
小弟對於性別友善廁所的意義有些不了解
如此將馬桶數量減少,並開放女性使用便能增進性別友善精神嗎?
將男廁開放並減少便斗數量,但同時女廁仍然維持純女廁
用意是要讓男生也體會女生的不便進而消除性別歧視嗎?
求多元性別專家解釋給性別盲的小弟了解
真心求解理性勿戰謝謝
感激不盡
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.244.40
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NTU/M.1488382915.A.E17.html
推
03/01 23:47, , 1F
03/01 23:47, 1F
推
03/01 23:48, , 2F
03/01 23:48, 2F
推
03/01 23:52, , 3F
03/01 23:52, 3F
→
03/01 23:52, , 4F
03/01 23:52, 4F
推
03/01 23:56, , 5F
03/01 23:56, 5F
推
03/01 23:59, , 6F
03/01 23:59, 6F
推
03/02 00:01, , 7F
03/02 00:01, 7F
→
03/02 00:01, , 8F
03/02 00:01, 8F
→
03/02 00:01, , 9F
03/02 00:01, 9F
推
03/02 00:02, , 10F
03/02 00:02, 10F
→
03/02 00:06, , 11F
03/02 00:06, 11F
推
03/02 00:11, , 12F
03/02 00:11, 12F
→
03/02 00:11, , 13F
03/02 00:11, 13F
說個笑話
把小便斗用門圍起來空間比較寬敞。
推
03/02 00:41, , 14F
03/02 00:41, 14F
推
03/02 00:50, , 15F
03/02 00:50, 15F
→
03/02 00:52, , 16F
03/02 00:52, 16F
→
03/02 00:53, , 17F
03/02 00:53, 17F
推
03/02 00:58, , 18F
03/02 00:58, 18F
※ 編輯: NTUME5566 (140.112.244.40), 03/02/2017 01:26:47
推
03/02 01:29, , 19F
03/02 01:29, 19F
→
03/02 01:29, , 20F
03/02 01:29, 20F
→
03/02 01:31, , 21F
03/02 01:31, 21F
推
03/02 01:33, , 22F
03/02 01:33, 22F
推
03/02 02:17, , 23F
03/02 02:17, 23F
噓
03/02 02:43, , 24F
03/02 02:43, 24F
→
03/02 02:43, , 25F
03/02 02:43, 25F
→
03/02 07:15, , 26F
03/02 07:15, 26F
推
03/02 09:49, , 27F
03/02 09:49, 27F
噓
03/02 10:01, , 28F
03/02 10:01, 28F
→
03/02 10:01, , 29F
03/02 10:01, 29F
推
03/02 11:42, , 30F
03/02 11:42, 30F
→
03/02 11:42, , 31F
03/02 11:42, 31F
→
03/02 11:42, , 32F
03/02 11:42, 32F
推
03/02 12:16, , 33F
03/02 12:16, 33F
→
03/02 12:16, , 34F
03/02 12:16, 34F
推
03/02 12:55, , 35F
03/02 12:55, 35F
噓
03/02 13:18, , 36F
03/02 13:18, 36F
推
03/02 13:23, , 37F
03/02 13:23, 37F
噓
03/02 13:34, , 38F
03/02 13:34, 38F
如果您不是反串的話能否請您撥冗為小弟解惑?
小弟是真的對性別友善廁所增加性別平權的效果感到不解
畢竟設立性別友善廁所或者推廣性別平權的用意
絕不是只為了打臉或懲罰所謂的沙豬或死異
男吧
[1m推 BigPlatform: 樓上Feminazi 03/02 13:41
→
03/02 16:37, , 39F
03/02 16:37, 39F
所以為什麼要犧牲??
※ 編輯: NTUME5566 (140.112.4.209), 03/02/2017 16:42:57
噓
03/02 16:44, , 40F
03/02 16:44, 40F
→
03/02 16:44, , 41F
03/02 16:44, 41F
推
03/02 17:31, , 42F
03/02 17:31, 42F
→
03/02 17:38, , 43F
03/02 17:38, 43F
推
03/02 18:13, , 44F
03/02 18:13, 44F
→
03/02 18:13, , 45F
03/02 18:13, 45F
噓
03/02 18:19, , 46F
03/02 18:19, 46F
推
03/02 19:08, , 47F
03/02 19:08, 47F
噓
03/02 20:46, , 48F
03/02 20:46, 48F
抱歉我手機操作失誤修掉您的部分推文
如果妳願意的話可以請您把我修掉的部分再講一次嗎?
或者可以的話甚至請您撥冗回一篇文為小弟解惑
小弟不會再編輯文章了
我相信道理是越辯越明,有道理的文字再說幾次都是有道理的
推
03/02 21:16, , 49F
03/02 21:16, 49F
→
03/02 21:17, , 50F
03/02 21:17, 50F
→
03/02 21:21, , 51F
03/02 21:21, 51F
→
03/02 21:21, , 52F
03/02 21:21, 52F
※ 編輯: NTUME5566 (140.112.244.40), 03/02/2017 21:33:29
噓
03/02 21:30, , 53F
03/02 21:30, 53F
→
03/02 21:31, , 54F
03/02 21:31, 54F
推
03/02 21:31, , 55F
03/02 21:31, 55F
→
03/02 21:31, , 56F
03/02 21:31, 56F
→
03/02 21:31, , 57F
03/02 21:31, 57F
推
03/02 21:31, , 58F
03/02 21:31, 58F
→
03/02 21:32, , 59F
03/02 21:32, 59F
→
03/02 21:32, , 60F
03/02 21:32, 60F
→
03/02 21:34, , 61F
03/02 21:34, 61F
→
03/02 21:34, , 62F
03/02 21:34, 62F
推
03/02 21:44, , 63F
03/02 21:44, 63F
→
03/02 21:44, , 64F
03/02 21:44, 64F
→
03/02 21:44, , 65F
03/02 21:44, 65F
→
03/02 21:44, , 66F
03/02 21:44, 66F
→
03/02 21:45, , 67F
03/02 21:45, 67F
→
03/02 21:45, , 68F
03/02 21:45, 68F
→
03/02 21:46, , 69F
03/02 21:46, 69F
→
03/02 21:46, , 70F
03/02 21:46, 70F
→
03/02 21:46, , 71F
03/02 21:46, 71F
→
03/02 21:46, , 72F
03/02 21:46, 72F
推
03/02 21:47, , 73F
03/02 21:47, 73F
→
03/02 21:48, , 74F
03/02 21:48, 74F
推
03/02 21:49, , 75F
03/02 21:49, 75F
推
03/02 21:55, , 76F
03/02 21:55, 76F
推
03/02 22:36, , 77F
03/02 22:36, 77F
推
03/02 23:41, , 78F
03/02 23:41, 78F
→
03/03 23:43, , 79F
03/03 23:43, 79F
→
03/04 13:53, , 80F
03/04 13:53, 80F
推
05/04 00:24, , 81F
05/04 00:24, 81F
→
05/04 00:24, , 82F
05/04 00:24, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)