Re: [閒聊] How to Shoot a Jump Shot
: "Pett"says that Kobe is a player who can only shoot a jump shot.
~~~~~?
The matter has already passed. Maybe you know what kind of past-
sentence can be used when you were a junior-school student. But
you don't know now!
: And He cannot form a threat to the other NBA players.
: Maybe after you watch this video, you will understand what you said
: is really ridiculous.
: Shooting a jump shot is significant to basketball scoring and player
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
= = It's really funny. I can't claim that your way is wrong, though
it is Taiwan-English. How about "make jumper"? This way is more
popular.
: development. How many players can master this skill to let other
: people be unable to defend? Maybe you shoule learn to appreciate
~~~~~~Cloze test= =?should
"unable to defend"? You must be kidding. A player with 0.45% career
FG% can called "unable to defend".
Where is MJ, BIRD, SHAQ... in your mind?
: his amazing ability through this video.
: His "fade-away shot" and "double pump" skills are nearly perfect.
: You can see how Kobe making plays. He is not only a 'go-to' man,
: but also getting his teammates involved.
HA~HA~~How humorous you are, The man makes lakers together is "Pau"
actually!You are puzzled by rapist critically,WWWWake up!!
I don't know what's the reason of your response to pett by English?
To show your foreign language skill? To practice?
In my opinion,what you do is just a joke.
: No doubt, Lakers is a championship-caliber team, and Kobe is
: a player of great skill.
: (write by bigbadwolf)
--
如果有一天,科比都沒人理了,你猜會是下列哪個原因?(可複選)
(1)科比已經無法爆強,下了他的神壇。
(2)比他更強的拐子手出現,讓他黔驢技窮。
(3)強大如科迷般的勢力,像5566一樣土崩瓦解。
(4)爆炸性的事件,如:丹佛交易再現,不得不換上科比24號囚衣。
(5)犯了LBJ龍顏,被小藤子貶為二線丑角。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 219.70.226.13
噓
06/04 22:08, , 1F
06/04 22:08, 1F
→
06/04 22:10, , 2F
06/04 22:10, 2F
推
06/04 22:10, , 3F
06/04 22:10, 3F
→
06/04 22:11, , 4F
06/04 22:11, 4F
→
06/04 22:11, , 5F
06/04 22:11, 5F
噓
06/04 22:11, , 6F
06/04 22:11, 6F
噓
06/04 22:11, , 7F
06/04 22:11, 7F
→
06/04 22:13, , 8F
06/04 22:13, 8F
→
06/04 22:13, , 9F
06/04 22:13, 9F
噓
06/04 22:13, , 10F
06/04 22:13, 10F
推
06/04 22:13, , 11F
06/04 22:13, 11F
→
06/04 22:13, , 12F
06/04 22:13, 12F
→
06/04 22:14, , 13F
06/04 22:14, 13F
→
06/04 22:15, , 14F
06/04 22:15, 14F
推
06/04 22:15, , 15F
06/04 22:15, 15F
→
06/04 22:15, , 16F
06/04 22:15, 16F
→
06/04 22:15, , 17F
06/04 22:15, 17F
→
06/04 22:16, , 18F
06/04 22:16, 18F
→
06/04 22:16, , 19F
06/04 22:16, 19F
推
06/04 22:17, , 20F
06/04 22:17, 20F
→
06/04 22:19, , 21F
06/04 22:19, 21F
→
06/04 22:20, , 22F
06/04 22:20, 22F
→
06/04 22:20, , 23F
06/04 22:20, 23F
推
06/04 22:21, , 24F
06/04 22:21, 24F
→
06/04 22:21, , 25F
06/04 22:21, 25F
→
06/04 22:21, , 26F
06/04 22:21, 26F
推
06/04 22:23, , 27F
06/04 22:23, 27F
→
06/04 22:24, , 28F
06/04 22:24, 28F
→
06/04 22:25, , 29F
06/04 22:25, 29F
→
06/04 22:25, , 30F
06/04 22:25, 30F
推
06/04 22:25, , 31F
06/04 22:25, 31F
→
06/04 22:26, , 32F
06/04 22:26, 32F
→
06/04 22:26, , 33F
06/04 22:26, 33F
→
06/04 22:26, , 34F
06/04 22:26, 34F
→
06/04 22:26, , 35F
06/04 22:26, 35F
→
06/04 22:26, , 36F
06/04 22:26, 36F
推
06/04 22:32, , 37F
06/04 22:32, 37F
→
06/04 22:32, , 38F
06/04 22:32, 38F
→
06/04 22:34, , 39F
06/04 22:34, 39F
推
06/04 22:36, , 40F
06/04 22:36, 40F
推
06/04 22:37, , 41F
06/04 22:37, 41F
→
06/04 22:37, , 42F
06/04 22:37, 42F
→
06/04 22:37, , 43F
06/04 22:37, 43F
→
06/04 22:39, , 44F
06/04 22:39, 44F
→
06/04 23:29, , 45F
06/04 23:29, 45F
→
06/04 23:30, , 46F
06/04 23:30, 46F
→
06/04 23:32, , 47F
06/04 23:32, 47F
→
06/04 23:32, , 48F
06/04 23:32, 48F
推
06/04 23:33, , 49F
06/04 23:33, 49F
推
06/05 12:03, , 50F
06/05 12:03, 50F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):