[討論] Lin跟Kobe當時為什麼搭不起來?消失
Lin本身組織能力夠
加上又可以雜魚升級能力
球給的也到位
Kobe有著黑曼巴精神,
強而暴力的絕殺跟切入、中距離、單打能力
為什麼這兩個
在湖人當時搭起來效果沒想像中好?
有沒有當時時空背景下的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.141.209.16
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1549975913.A.386.html
推
02/12 20:52, , 1F
02/12 20:52, 1F
推
02/12 20:52, , 2F
02/12 20:52, 2F
→
02/12 20:52, , 3F
02/12 20:52, 3F
噓
02/12 20:52, , 4F
02/12 20:52, 4F
→
02/12 20:53, , 5F
02/12 20:53, 5F
推
02/12 20:53, , 6F
02/12 20:53, 6F
推
02/12 20:53, , 7F
02/12 20:53, 7F
噓
02/12 20:54, , 8F
02/12 20:54, 8F
推
02/12 20:54, , 9F
02/12 20:54, 9F
推
02/12 20:54, , 10F
02/12 20:54, 10F
→
02/12 20:54, , 11F
02/12 20:54, 11F
→
02/12 20:54, , 12F
02/12 20:54, 12F
→
02/12 20:54, , 13F
02/12 20:54, 13F
推
02/12 20:54, , 14F
02/12 20:54, 14F
推
02/12 20:55, , 15F
02/12 20:55, 15F
噓
02/12 20:55, , 16F
02/12 20:55, 16F
→
02/12 20:56, , 17F
02/12 20:56, 17F
→
02/12 20:56, , 18F
02/12 20:56, 18F
推
02/12 20:57, , 19F
02/12 20:57, 19F
→
02/12 20:58, , 20F
02/12 20:58, 20F
推
02/12 20:58, , 21F
02/12 20:58, 21F
推
02/12 20:58, , 22F
02/12 20:58, 22F
→
02/12 20:58, , 23F
02/12 20:58, 23F
→
02/12 20:58, , 24F
02/12 20:58, 24F
→
02/12 20:59, , 25F
02/12 20:59, 25F
推
02/12 20:59, , 26F
02/12 20:59, 26F
推
02/12 21:00, , 27F
02/12 21:00, 27F
噓
02/12 21:00, , 28F
02/12 21:00, 28F
推
02/12 21:00, , 29F
02/12 21:00, 29F
噓
02/12 21:00, , 30F
02/12 21:00, 30F
→
02/12 21:00, , 31F
02/12 21:00, 31F
推
02/12 21:00, , 32F
02/12 21:00, 32F
→
02/12 21:01, , 33F
02/12 21:01, 33F
推
02/12 21:01, , 34F
02/12 21:01, 34F
推
02/12 21:02, , 35F
02/12 21:02, 35F
→
02/12 21:02, , 36F
02/12 21:02, 36F
推
02/12 21:03, , 37F
02/12 21:03, 37F
推
02/12 21:03, , 38F
02/12 21:03, 38F
→
02/12 21:04, , 39F
02/12 21:04, 39F
還有 77 則推文
→
02/12 21:48, , 117F
02/12 21:48, 117F
噓
02/12 21:50, , 118F
02/12 21:50, 118F
推
02/12 21:50, , 119F
02/12 21:50, 119F
推
02/12 21:51, , 120F
02/12 21:51, 120F
推
02/12 21:51, , 121F
02/12 21:51, 121F
推
02/12 21:52, , 122F
02/12 21:52, 122F
→
02/12 21:52, , 123F
02/12 21:52, 123F
推
02/12 21:52, , 124F
02/12 21:52, 124F
推
02/12 21:52, , 125F
02/12 21:52, 125F
→
02/12 21:53, , 126F
02/12 21:53, 126F
→
02/12 21:56, , 127F
02/12 21:56, 127F
→
02/12 21:58, , 128F
02/12 21:58, 128F
推
02/12 22:02, , 129F
02/12 22:02, 129F
推
02/12 22:02, , 130F
02/12 22:02, 130F
推
02/12 22:02, , 131F
02/12 22:02, 131F
推
02/12 22:02, , 132F
02/12 22:02, 132F
推
02/12 22:03, , 133F
02/12 22:03, 133F
→
02/12 22:04, , 134F
02/12 22:04, 134F
→
02/12 22:04, , 135F
02/12 22:04, 135F
→
02/12 22:04, , 136F
02/12 22:04, 136F
→
02/12 22:05, , 137F
02/12 22:05, 137F
→
02/12 22:05, , 138F
02/12 22:05, 138F
→
02/12 22:05, , 139F
02/12 22:05, 139F
→
02/12 22:05, , 140F
02/12 22:05, 140F
推
02/12 22:06, , 141F
02/12 22:06, 141F
→
02/12 22:06, , 142F
02/12 22:06, 142F
→
02/12 22:06, , 143F
02/12 22:06, 143F
推
02/12 22:06, , 144F
02/12 22:06, 144F
→
02/12 22:07, , 145F
02/12 22:07, 145F
→
02/12 22:07, , 146F
02/12 22:07, 146F
→
02/12 22:07, , 147F
02/12 22:07, 147F
→
02/12 22:08, , 148F
02/12 22:08, 148F
→
02/12 22:16, , 149F
02/12 22:16, 149F
推
02/12 22:17, , 150F
02/12 22:17, 150F
→
02/12 22:18, , 151F
02/12 22:18, 151F
→
02/12 22:18, , 152F
02/12 22:18, 152F
推
02/12 22:20, , 153F
02/12 22:20, 153F
推
02/12 22:23, , 154F
02/12 22:23, 154F
→
02/12 22:24, , 155F
02/12 22:24, 155F
→
02/12 22:24, , 156F
02/12 22:24, 156F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):