[討論] 賽爾蒂克會慶幸沒選到J.Jackson嗎?消失
季前討論選Josh Jackson
是對賽爾蒂克最安全的選擇
考量不外乎打的位置以及地板高(養壞機會不大)
沒想到Jackson自己取消試訓
才選了Tatum
Jackson還放話要讓沒選他的球隊後悔
如今以馬後炮而論還真是對的選擇
現在Tatum 三圍.490/.478/.845
平均13.7分5.4籃板,火鍋、抄截都接近1
還有高達2.2的DBPM
反而Jackson 三圍.381/.246/.517
平均8.8分,3.6籃板,1.2抄截
雖然上場時間和隊伍戰術有差異
但表現差距之大
會不會讓球迷慶幸沒選到Jackson?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.77.187.71
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1512019974.A.F31.html
推
11/30 13:33, , 1F
11/30 13:33, 1F
推
11/30 13:33, , 2F
11/30 13:33, 2F
推
11/30 13:33, , 3F
11/30 13:33, 3F
→
11/30 13:33, , 4F
11/30 13:33, 4F
推
11/30 13:34, , 5F
11/30 13:34, 5F
推
11/30 13:34, , 6F
11/30 13:34, 6F
推
11/30 13:35, , 7F
11/30 13:35, 7F
→
11/30 13:35, , 8F
11/30 13:35, 8F
推
11/30 13:35, , 9F
11/30 13:35, 9F
→
11/30 13:35, , 10F
11/30 13:35, 10F
抱歉,那我記錯了,我只記得有篇說賽隊有即戰力需求
所以打算放棄Fultz選JJ
推
11/30 13:35, , 11F
11/30 13:35, 11F
→
11/30 13:35, , 12F
11/30 13:35, 12F
→
11/30 13:36, , 13F
11/30 13:36, 13F
→
11/30 13:36, , 14F
11/30 13:36, 14F
推
11/30 13:36, , 15F
11/30 13:36, 15F
→
11/30 13:36, , 16F
11/30 13:36, 16F
→
11/30 13:36, , 17F
11/30 13:36, 17F
→
11/30 13:36, , 18F
11/30 13:36, 18F
→
11/30 13:37, , 19F
11/30 13:37, 19F
→
11/30 13:37, , 20F
11/30 13:37, 20F
→
11/30 13:37, , 21F
11/30 13:37, 21F
※ 編輯: cpks (42.77.187.71), 11/30/2017 13:40:10
噓
11/30 13:38, , 22F
11/30 13:38, 22F
推
11/30 13:40, , 23F
11/30 13:40, 23F
噓
11/30 13:40, , 24F
11/30 13:40, 24F
噓
11/30 13:40, , 25F
11/30 13:40, 25F
→
11/30 13:40, , 26F
11/30 13:40, 26F
→
11/30 13:41, , 27F
11/30 13:41, 27F
推
11/30 13:41, , 28F
11/30 13:41, 28F
→
11/30 13:41, , 29F
11/30 13:41, 29F
推
11/30 13:41, , 30F
11/30 13:41, 30F
噓
11/30 13:42, , 31F
11/30 13:42, 31F
噓
11/30 13:42, , 32F
11/30 13:42, 32F
推
11/30 13:43, , 33F
11/30 13:43, 33F
→
11/30 13:43, , 34F
11/30 13:43, 34F
推
11/30 13:43, , 35F
11/30 13:43, 35F
→
11/30 13:43, , 36F
11/30 13:43, 36F
→
11/30 13:43, , 37F
11/30 13:43, 37F
還有 328 則推文
推
11/30 17:04, , 366F
11/30 17:04, 366F
→
11/30 17:04, , 367F
11/30 17:04, 367F
推
11/30 17:05, , 368F
11/30 17:05, 368F
→
11/30 17:05, , 369F
11/30 17:05, 369F
→
11/30 17:07, , 370F
11/30 17:07, 370F
推
11/30 17:08, , 371F
11/30 17:08, 371F
→
11/30 17:11, , 372F
11/30 17:11, 372F
推
11/30 17:23, , 373F
11/30 17:23, 373F
→
11/30 17:23, , 374F
11/30 17:23, 374F
推
11/30 17:26, , 375F
11/30 17:26, 375F
→
11/30 17:26, , 376F
11/30 17:26, 376F
推
11/30 17:28, , 377F
11/30 17:28, 377F
→
11/30 17:28, , 378F
11/30 17:28, 378F
推
11/30 17:32, , 379F
11/30 17:32, 379F
→
11/30 17:34, , 380F
11/30 17:34, 380F
推
11/30 17:35, , 381F
11/30 17:35, 381F
→
11/30 17:35, , 382F
11/30 17:35, 382F
推
11/30 17:39, , 383F
11/30 17:39, 383F
推
11/30 17:54, , 384F
11/30 17:54, 384F
推
11/30 17:55, , 385F
11/30 17:55, 385F
推
11/30 18:02, , 386F
11/30 18:02, 386F
推
11/30 18:35, , 387F
11/30 18:35, 387F
→
11/30 18:35, , 388F
11/30 18:35, 388F
→
11/30 18:35, , 389F
11/30 18:35, 389F
推
11/30 18:43, , 390F
11/30 18:43, 390F
推
11/30 18:45, , 391F
11/30 18:45, 391F
推
11/30 19:02, , 392F
11/30 19:02, 392F
→
11/30 19:08, , 393F
11/30 19:08, 393F
推
11/30 19:33, , 394F
11/30 19:33, 394F
推
11/30 19:47, , 395F
11/30 19:47, 395F
→
11/30 19:47, , 396F
11/30 19:47, 396F
推
11/30 19:58, , 397F
11/30 19:58, 397F
推
11/30 20:08, , 398F
11/30 20:08, 398F
推
11/30 20:33, , 399F
11/30 20:33, 399F
噓
11/30 20:45, , 400F
11/30 20:45, 400F
→
11/30 20:45, , 401F
11/30 20:45, 401F
推
11/30 21:49, , 402F
11/30 21:49, 402F
推
11/30 22:17, , 403F
11/30 22:17, 403F
推
12/01 02:00, , 404F
12/01 02:00, 404F
推
12/01 08:02, , 405F
12/01 08:02, 405F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):