Re: [討論] 甜瓜真的適合進攻萬花筒的稱號嗎?消失
進攻萬花筒,金塊時或許較接近
但金塊時期他三分普普,出手也不多
而到尼克後期,三分變好,但切入廢掉了
所以我覺得「跳投萬花筒」,比較適合他
試探步跳投、後撤步、急停、硬拔
C&S、背框等,都有不錯的水準
下面這影片可參考一下
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXVn_77O-nE&t=215s
影片應該不是故意剪跳投,
是近年來真的只剩跳投
但不管怎麼說,當大家都知道你沒切入
專心防你跳投,但還能用些奇怪的招式
把球投進,也算是種天賦了
希望他在雷霆,也能有場均20分的表現
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.161.98.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1507303653.A.883.html
推
10/06 23:30, , 1F
10/06 23:30, 1F
→
10/06 23:32, , 2F
10/06 23:32, 2F
推
10/06 23:40, , 3F
10/06 23:40, 3F
推
10/06 23:46, , 4F
10/06 23:46, 4F
推
10/06 23:51, , 5F
10/06 23:51, 5F
推
10/06 23:54, , 6F
10/06 23:54, 6F
→
10/06 23:54, , 7F
10/06 23:54, 7F
→
10/06 23:55, , 8F
10/06 23:55, 8F
→
10/06 23:56, , 9F
10/06 23:56, 9F
→
10/06 23:58, , 10F
10/06 23:58, 10F
推
10/06 23:58, , 11F
10/06 23:58, 11F
→
10/06 23:58, , 12F
10/06 23:58, 12F
推
10/07 00:00, , 13F
10/07 00:00, 13F
推
10/07 00:05, , 14F
10/07 00:05, 14F
→
10/07 00:05, , 15F
10/07 00:05, 15F
推
10/07 00:06, , 16F
10/07 00:06, 16F
→
10/07 00:11, , 17F
10/07 00:11, 17F
推
10/07 00:12, , 18F
10/07 00:12, 18F
→
10/07 00:13, , 19F
10/07 00:13, 19F
推
10/07 00:14, , 20F
10/07 00:14, 20F
推
10/07 00:18, , 21F
10/07 00:18, 21F
→
10/07 00:19, , 22F
10/07 00:19, 22F
推
10/07 00:27, , 23F
10/07 00:27, 23F
推
10/07 00:47, , 24F
10/07 00:47, 24F
推
10/07 00:48, , 25F
10/07 00:48, 25F
→
10/07 00:48, , 26F
10/07 00:48, 26F
推
10/07 00:58, , 27F
10/07 00:58, 27F
→
10/07 00:58, , 28F
10/07 00:58, 28F
→
10/07 00:58, , 29F
10/07 00:58, 29F
→
10/07 00:59, , 30F
10/07 00:59, 30F
推
10/07 01:06, , 31F
10/07 01:06, 31F
→
10/07 01:08, , 32F
10/07 01:08, 32F
推
10/07 01:08, , 33F
10/07 01:08, 33F
→
10/07 01:08, , 34F
10/07 01:08, 34F
→
10/07 01:10, , 35F
10/07 01:10, 35F
推
10/07 01:16, , 36F
10/07 01:16, 36F
→
10/07 01:16, , 37F
10/07 01:16, 37F
推
10/07 01:16, , 38F
10/07 01:16, 38F
→
10/07 01:17, , 39F
10/07 01:17, 39F
→
10/07 01:17, , 40F
10/07 01:17, 40F
→
10/07 01:21, , 41F
10/07 01:21, 41F
→
10/07 01:21, , 42F
10/07 01:21, 42F
→
10/07 01:22, , 43F
10/07 01:22, 43F
→
10/07 01:22, , 44F
10/07 01:22, 44F
→
10/07 01:23, , 45F
10/07 01:23, 45F
推
10/07 01:24, , 46F
10/07 01:24, 46F
→
10/07 01:24, , 47F
10/07 01:24, 47F
→
10/07 01:25, , 48F
10/07 01:25, 48F
→
10/07 01:26, , 49F
10/07 01:26, 49F
→
10/07 01:26, , 50F
10/07 01:26, 50F
推
10/07 01:32, , 51F
10/07 01:32, 51F
→
10/07 01:32, , 52F
10/07 01:32, 52F
推
10/07 01:52, , 53F
10/07 01:52, 53F
推
10/07 02:16, , 54F
10/07 02:16, 54F
→
10/07 02:16, , 55F
10/07 02:16, 55F
推
10/07 02:35, , 56F
10/07 02:35, 56F
推
10/07 02:45, , 57F
10/07 02:45, 57F
→
10/07 02:45, , 58F
10/07 02:45, 58F
推
10/07 02:52, , 59F
10/07 02:52, 59F
推
10/07 02:59, , 60F
10/07 02:59, 60F
推
10/07 06:25, , 61F
10/07 06:25, 61F
推
10/07 06:28, , 62F
10/07 06:28, 62F
推
10/07 07:02, , 63F
10/07 07:02, 63F
→
10/07 07:03, , 64F
10/07 07:03, 64F
推
10/07 08:42, , 65F
10/07 08:42, 65F
推
10/07 08:49, , 66F
10/07 08:49, 66F
→
10/07 08:52, , 67F
10/07 08:52, 67F
推
10/07 11:19, , 68F
10/07 11:19, 68F
推
10/07 12:18, , 69F
10/07 12:18, 69F
推
10/08 12:19, , 70F
10/08 12:19, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):