[討論] 那些年被姆斯弱化的球星們已刪文
其實姆斯生涯中搭配過很多不錯的明星球員,
只是他們和姆斯一搭配後,就弱掉了
我在這整理出被姆斯弱化過的球星們,歡迎補充
Larry Hughes
轉隊前:22分6.3板4.7助攻 (比Lamar odom還強一檔的等級)
跟姆斯一隊後:15.5分4.5板3.6助攻
Antawn Jamison
轉隊前:20.5分8.8板(這數據比Pau Gasol更好)
跟姆斯一隊後:15.8分7.7板
歐肥
轉隊前:17.8分8.4板
跟姆斯一隊後:12分6.7板
Kevin Love
轉隊前:26.1分12.5板(歷史級大前鋒等級)
跟姆斯一隊後:16.4分9.8板
Chris Bosh
轉隊前:24分10.8板
跟姆斯一隊後:18.7分8.3板
跟姆斯一隊很可憐
因為被姆斯體系弱化,有些球員就會開始被酸以前的成績都是洗出來的
以前的努力都被酸的一文不值
不過這麼多被弱化的案例,應可還他們一個公道,
他們不弱,只是被姆斯體系弱化了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.36.133.128
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1504466229.A.ADD.html
※ 編輯: s106667 (114.36.133.128), 09/04/2017 03:22:26
推
09/04 03:24, , 1F
09/04 03:24, 1F
噓
09/04 03:25, , 2F
09/04 03:25, 2F
噓
09/04 03:30, , 3F
09/04 03:30, 3F
噓
09/04 03:31, , 4F
09/04 03:31, 4F
噓
09/04 03:31, , 5F
09/04 03:31, 5F
噓
09/04 03:34, , 6F
09/04 03:34, 6F
噓
09/04 03:41, , 7F
09/04 03:41, 7F
噓
09/04 03:50, , 8F
09/04 03:50, 8F
推
09/04 03:56, , 9F
09/04 03:56, 9F
噓
09/04 04:14, , 10F
09/04 04:14, 10F
噓
09/04 04:20, , 11F
09/04 04:20, 11F
推
09/04 04:26, , 12F
09/04 04:26, 12F
推
09/04 04:27, , 13F
09/04 04:27, 13F
推
09/04 04:31, , 14F
09/04 04:31, 14F
推
09/04 05:27, , 15F
09/04 05:27, 15F
噓
09/04 06:13, , 16F
09/04 06:13, 16F
推
09/04 06:25, , 17F
09/04 06:25, 17F
推
09/04 06:46, , 18F
09/04 06:46, 18F
噓
09/04 06:57, , 19F
09/04 06:57, 19F
噓
09/04 06:58, , 20F
09/04 06:58, 20F
推
09/04 07:23, , 21F
09/04 07:23, 21F
→
09/04 07:23, , 22F
09/04 07:23, 22F
噓
09/04 07:33, , 23F
09/04 07:33, 23F
推
09/04 07:33, , 24F
09/04 07:33, 24F
推
09/04 07:58, , 25F
09/04 07:58, 25F
噓
09/04 08:01, , 26F
09/04 08:01, 26F
推
09/04 08:03, , 27F
09/04 08:03, 27F
噓
09/04 08:28, , 28F
09/04 08:28, 28F
推
09/04 08:39, , 29F
09/04 08:39, 29F
推
09/04 08:56, , 30F
09/04 08:56, 30F
噓
09/04 09:11, , 31F
09/04 09:11, 31F
推
09/04 09:11, , 32F
09/04 09:11, 32F
推
09/04 09:59, , 33F
09/04 09:59, 33F
噓
09/04 10:13, , 34F
09/04 10:13, 34F
噓
09/04 10:18, , 35F
09/04 10:18, 35F
推
09/04 10:31, , 36F
09/04 10:31, 36F
推
09/04 10:51, , 37F
09/04 10:51, 37F
噓
09/04 11:01, , 38F
09/04 11:01, 38F
噓
09/04 11:03, , 39F
09/04 11:03, 39F
推
09/04 11:05, , 40F
09/04 11:05, 40F
噓
09/04 11:19, , 41F
09/04 11:19, 41F
推
09/04 11:42, , 42F
09/04 11:42, 42F
推
09/04 11:47, , 43F
09/04 11:47, 43F
推
09/04 11:47, , 44F
09/04 11:47, 44F
推
09/04 11:51, , 45F
09/04 11:51, 45F
推
09/04 11:54, , 46F
09/04 11:54, 46F
噓
09/04 11:56, , 47F
09/04 11:56, 47F
推
09/04 12:18, , 48F
09/04 12:18, 48F
推
09/04 12:22, , 49F
09/04 12:22, 49F
推
09/04 12:41, , 50F
09/04 12:41, 50F
→
09/04 12:41, , 51F
09/04 12:41, 51F
推
09/04 12:47, , 52F
09/04 12:47, 52F
→
09/04 12:47, , 53F
09/04 12:47, 53F
推
09/04 13:07, , 54F
09/04 13:07, 54F
噓
09/04 13:10, , 55F
09/04 13:10, 55F
→
09/04 13:27, , 56F
09/04 13:27, 56F
推
09/04 13:31, , 57F
09/04 13:31, 57F
→
09/04 13:38, , 58F
09/04 13:38, 58F
推
09/04 13:42, , 59F
09/04 13:42, 59F
→
09/04 14:20, , 60F
09/04 14:20, 60F
推
09/04 16:25, , 61F
09/04 16:25, 61F
→
09/04 19:01, , 62F
09/04 19:01, 62F
噓
09/04 19:35, , 63F
09/04 19:35, 63F
推
09/04 23:08, , 64F
09/04 23:08, 64F
噓
09/05 01:06, , 65F
09/05 01:06, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):