[討論] 現今NBA的"五小戰術"真的是王道嗎??
自從勇士隊以死亡五小戰術打出名號後
感覺NBA球隊的陣形也因此起了變化
傳統禁區球員式微
別說大後鋒的興起
就連中鋒也須具備投射外線的能力
(像AJ、MONROE這類善於低位進攻的中鋒竟然一度乏人問津??)
這是否意味著"五小陣容"即將成為王道??
我個人是持保留懷疑的態度
畢竟"勇士五小"算是特例
姑且不算後來加入的KD
勇士陣中擁有兩個聯盟前兩名的射手
再加上機動性強、能從中鋒防到後衛、又能攻輸傳導的PF固守禁區
再搭配兩個防守不錯的前鋒
才能將五小陣容作起來
現在學勇士的
都嘛學得四不像
畢竟射手等級就差人一級
禁區球員要嘛防守不強,要不然就是沒有供輸傳導能力
這樣的山寨版要如何打倒原創版??
我個人預測
倘若明年有那支球隊可以扳倒勇士
那支球隊一定不會是5小陣容
(最多一大四小吧,嚴格說來,近七呎的KD加入勇士,勇士應該比較像一大四小的陣形)
而是以強勢的禁區攻擊獲勝
--
推
,
→
,
→
,
→
,
→
,
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.26.170.5
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1498967356.A.0D9.html
推
07/02 11:49, , 1F
07/02 11:49, 1F
※ 編輯: filmystery (114.26.170.5), 07/02/2017 11:50:27
→
07/02 11:50, , 2F
07/02 11:50, 2F
推
07/02 11:51, , 3F
07/02 11:51, 3F
推
07/02 11:52, , 4F
07/02 11:52, 4F
推
07/02 11:53, , 5F
07/02 11:53, 5F
→
07/02 11:53, , 6F
07/02 11:53, 6F
→
07/02 11:53, , 7F
07/02 11:53, 7F
推
07/02 11:54, , 8F
07/02 11:54, 8F
推
07/02 11:55, , 9F
07/02 11:55, 9F
推
07/02 11:55, , 10F
07/02 11:55, 10F
推
07/02 11:56, , 11F
07/02 11:56, 11F
→
07/02 11:56, , 12F
07/02 11:56, 12F
推
07/02 11:56, , 13F
07/02 11:56, 13F
→
07/02 11:57, , 14F
07/02 11:57, 14F
推
07/02 11:58, , 15F
07/02 11:58, 15F
噓
07/02 11:58, , 16F
07/02 11:58, 16F
推
07/02 12:00, , 17F
07/02 12:00, 17F
→
07/02 12:01, , 18F
07/02 12:01, 18F
推
07/02 12:02, , 19F
07/02 12:02, 19F
→
07/02 12:03, , 20F
07/02 12:03, 20F
推
07/02 12:04, , 21F
07/02 12:04, 21F
推
07/02 12:06, , 22F
07/02 12:06, 22F
推
07/02 12:07, , 23F
07/02 12:07, 23F
→
07/02 12:07, , 24F
07/02 12:07, 24F
→
07/02 12:08, , 25F
07/02 12:08, 25F
推
07/02 12:08, , 26F
07/02 12:08, 26F
→
07/02 12:09, , 27F
07/02 12:09, 27F
推
07/02 12:10, , 28F
07/02 12:10, 28F
→
07/02 12:10, , 29F
07/02 12:10, 29F
→
07/02 12:10, , 30F
07/02 12:10, 30F
→
07/02 12:11, , 31F
07/02 12:11, 31F
→
07/02 12:11, , 32F
07/02 12:11, 32F
→
07/02 12:11, , 33F
07/02 12:11, 33F
→
07/02 12:12, , 34F
07/02 12:12, 34F
→
07/02 12:12, , 35F
07/02 12:12, 35F
→
07/02 12:13, , 36F
07/02 12:13, 36F
→
07/02 12:13, , 37F
07/02 12:13, 37F
推
07/02 12:14, , 38F
07/02 12:14, 38F
→
07/02 12:14, , 39F
07/02 12:14, 39F
推
07/02 12:14, , 40F
07/02 12:14, 40F
推
07/02 12:15, , 41F
07/02 12:15, 41F
→
07/02 12:15, , 42F
07/02 12:15, 42F
推
07/02 12:17, , 43F
07/02 12:17, 43F
推
07/02 12:19, , 44F
07/02 12:19, 44F
→
07/02 12:21, , 45F
07/02 12:21, 45F
噓
07/02 12:25, , 46F
07/02 12:25, 46F
推
07/02 12:25, , 47F
07/02 12:25, 47F
推
07/02 12:28, , 48F
07/02 12:28, 48F
→
07/02 12:29, , 49F
07/02 12:29, 49F
推
07/02 12:32, , 50F
07/02 12:32, 50F
推
07/02 12:32, , 51F
07/02 12:32, 51F
→
07/02 12:33, , 52F
07/02 12:33, 52F
推
07/02 12:33, , 53F
07/02 12:33, 53F
推
07/02 12:33, , 54F
07/02 12:33, 54F
推
07/02 12:49, , 55F
07/02 12:49, 55F
→
07/02 12:58, , 56F
07/02 12:58, 56F
推
07/02 12:58, , 57F
07/02 12:58, 57F
→
07/02 12:59, , 58F
07/02 12:59, 58F
噓
07/02 13:14, , 59F
07/02 13:14, 59F
推
07/02 13:22, , 60F
07/02 13:22, 60F
噓
07/02 13:35, , 61F
07/02 13:35, 61F
推
07/02 13:44, , 62F
07/02 13:44, 62F
→
07/02 13:44, , 63F
07/02 13:44, 63F
→
07/02 13:45, , 64F
07/02 13:45, 64F
→
07/02 13:45, , 65F
07/02 13:45, 65F
推
07/02 13:53, , 66F
07/02 13:53, 66F
→
07/02 13:54, , 67F
07/02 13:54, 67F
→
07/02 14:09, , 68F
07/02 14:09, 68F
推
07/02 14:25, , 69F
07/02 14:25, 69F
推
07/02 14:39, , 70F
07/02 14:39, 70F
推
07/02 15:06, , 71F
07/02 15:06, 71F
推
07/02 15:44, , 72F
07/02 15:44, 72F
→
07/02 15:44, , 73F
07/02 15:44, 73F
→
07/02 15:45, , 74F
07/02 15:45, 74F
推
07/02 16:25, , 75F
07/02 16:25, 75F
推
07/02 17:22, , 76F
07/02 17:22, 76F
→
07/02 17:23, , 77F
07/02 17:23, 77F
→
07/02 17:23, , 78F
07/02 17:23, 78F
→
07/02 17:24, , 79F
07/02 17:24, 79F
→
07/02 17:25, , 80F
07/02 17:25, 80F
推
07/02 18:09, , 81F
07/02 18:09, 81F
推
07/02 19:55, , 82F
07/02 19:55, 82F
推
07/02 20:28, , 83F
07/02 20:28, 83F
→
07/02 23:03, , 84F
07/02 23:03, 84F
推
07/03 06:06, , 85F
07/03 06:06, 85F