Re: [討論] Curry三分球有可能超過雷槍嗎
※ 引述《xpu (叉批U)》之銘言:
: 如題
: 今天轉播的時候聽到主播說
: 咖哩本季的三分球是229個 單季最佳則是雷槍的269
: 以Curry現在25歲 命中599個三分球
: 要追上雷槍37歲的 2840顆三分球
: 如果Curry到37歲都全勤出賽
: 每場球至少要2.27個三分球才能超過雷槍
: 恐怖的是雷槍還在熱火刷紀錄
: 各位覺得Curry有機會超過雷槍嗎?
借這篇問一下兩個問題
1.Curry的三分球總數有可能超越Ray Allen嗎?
2.Curry 巔峰期真的輸給Ray Allen嗎?
看了下面鄉民的留言,似乎清一色絕對Curry三分球總數不可能超越Ray Allen, 整體能
力也比Ray Allen 年輕巔峰期差很多。 Curry已經很強了,那到底當初Ray Allen有多強?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 39.10.65.88
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1496958180.A.D86.html
※ 編輯: mimi8598 (39.10.65.88), 06/09/2017 05:44:26
推
06/09 05:44, , 1F
06/09 05:44, 1F
推
06/09 05:45, , 2F
06/09 05:45, 2F
推
06/09 05:46, , 3F
06/09 05:46, 3F
推
06/09 05:46, , 4F
06/09 05:46, 4F
推
06/09 05:46, , 5F
06/09 05:46, 5F
推
06/09 05:50, , 6F
06/09 05:50, 6F
→
06/09 05:50, , 7F
06/09 05:50, 7F
推
06/09 06:01, , 8F
06/09 06:01, 8F
→
06/09 06:02, , 9F
06/09 06:02, 9F
→
06/09 06:02, , 10F
06/09 06:02, 10F
推
06/09 06:04, , 11F
06/09 06:04, 11F
推
06/09 06:21, , 12F
06/09 06:21, 12F
→
06/09 06:22, , 13F
06/09 06:22, 13F
→
06/09 06:34, , 14F
06/09 06:34, 14F
→
06/09 07:33, , 15F
06/09 07:33, 15F
→
06/09 07:33, , 16F
06/09 07:33, 16F
推
06/09 07:52, , 17F
06/09 07:52, 17F
推
06/09 07:53, , 18F
06/09 07:53, 18F
→
06/09 07:55, , 19F
06/09 07:55, 19F
→
06/09 07:55, , 20F
06/09 07:55, 20F
→
06/09 07:56, , 21F
06/09 07:56, 21F
→
06/09 07:56, , 22F
06/09 07:56, 22F
推
06/09 08:01, , 23F
06/09 08:01, 23F
推
06/09 08:07, , 24F
06/09 08:07, 24F
推
06/09 08:09, , 25F
06/09 08:09, 25F
→
06/09 08:10, , 26F
06/09 08:10, 26F
推
06/09 08:11, , 27F
06/09 08:11, 27F
→
06/09 08:13, , 28F
06/09 08:13, 28F
→
06/09 08:14, , 29F
06/09 08:14, 29F
→
06/09 08:15, , 30F
06/09 08:15, 30F
→
06/09 08:15, , 31F
06/09 08:15, 31F
→
06/09 08:16, , 32F
06/09 08:16, 32F
推
06/09 08:19, , 33F
06/09 08:19, 33F
推
06/09 08:26, , 34F
06/09 08:26, 34F
推
06/09 08:27, , 35F
06/09 08:27, 35F
→
06/09 08:29, , 36F
06/09 08:29, 36F
推
06/09 08:32, , 37F
06/09 08:32, 37F
→
06/09 08:33, , 38F
06/09 08:33, 38F
→
06/09 08:35, , 39F
06/09 08:35, 39F
→
06/09 08:36, , 40F
06/09 08:36, 40F
→
06/09 08:36, , 41F
06/09 08:36, 41F
→
06/09 08:37, , 42F
06/09 08:37, 42F
推
06/09 08:37, , 43F
06/09 08:37, 43F
→
06/09 08:38, , 44F
06/09 08:38, 44F
→
06/09 08:39, , 45F
06/09 08:39, 45F
→
06/09 08:40, , 46F
06/09 08:40, 46F
推
06/09 08:41, , 47F
06/09 08:41, 47F
→
06/09 08:41, , 48F
06/09 08:41, 48F
推
06/09 08:42, , 49F
06/09 08:42, 49F
→
06/09 08:42, , 50F
06/09 08:42, 50F
→
06/09 08:42, , 51F
06/09 08:42, 51F
→
06/09 08:42, , 52F
06/09 08:42, 52F
→
06/09 08:43, , 53F
06/09 08:43, 53F
→
06/09 08:43, , 54F
06/09 08:43, 54F
→
06/09 08:44, , 55F
06/09 08:44, 55F
推
06/09 08:55, , 56F
06/09 08:55, 56F
→
06/09 08:55, , 57F
06/09 08:55, 57F
→
06/09 08:55, , 58F
06/09 08:55, 58F
→
06/09 08:55, , 59F
06/09 08:55, 59F
推
06/09 09:05, , 60F
06/09 09:05, 60F
→
06/09 09:05, , 61F
06/09 09:05, 61F
→
06/09 09:14, , 62F
06/09 09:14, 62F
推
06/09 09:54, , 63F
06/09 09:54, 63F
推
06/09 09:57, , 64F
06/09 09:57, 64F
噓
06/09 10:25, , 65F
06/09 10:25, 65F
推
06/09 10:41, , 66F
06/09 10:41, 66F
推
06/09 10:42, , 67F
06/09 10:42, 67F
推
06/09 11:03, , 68F
06/09 11:03, 68F
推
06/09 11:16, , 69F
06/09 11:16, 69F
推
06/09 11:43, , 70F
06/09 11:43, 70F
推
06/09 12:25, , 71F
06/09 12:25, 71F
→
06/09 12:25, , 72F
06/09 12:25, 72F
推
06/09 13:40, , 73F
06/09 13:40, 73F
推
06/09 13:56, , 74F
06/09 13:56, 74F
→
06/09 13:57, , 75F
06/09 13:57, 75F
→
06/09 13:57, , 76F
06/09 13:57, 76F
→
06/09 15:51, , 77F
06/09 15:51, 77F
→
06/09 15:52, , 78F
06/09 15:52, 78F
推
06/09 16:45, , 79F
06/09 16:45, 79F
推
06/09 19:16, , 80F
06/09 19:16, 80F
推
06/09 20:03, , 81F
06/09 20:03, 81F
推
06/09 20:49, , 82F
06/09 20:49, 82F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):