[討論] 為什麼不讓Frye上場打打看?
蠻好奇的
在騎士第一場已經輸這麼多的情況下
為什麼不讓Frye上場打打看呢?
Frye 6尺11寸
是騎士唯一的替補中鋒
最大的本領就是跟KD一樣賣高、顏射對手。
相對於放KK上去,被守到投不進
然後防守又被幹爆
Frye只需要一點擋拆就有足夠的空檔顏射對手
在防守上
騎士原本防守就已經夠爛了
Frye要讓騎士失更多分好像更難
更何況他還有身高優勢
假如李文有上場的話
可以拿來守李文
李文拿手的中距離反而也打不開
以前騎士死亡陣容中
Frye佔了很重要的位置
現在卻被RJ取代了
RJ今天幾球攻籃下是不錯啦~
但我覺得可以試著把KK換成Frye看看
防守上兩個人應該差不多爛
但是Frye的高度應該就比較不怕勇士
的那群6尺7長人海
為什麼不用一下Frye看看呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.34.212.7
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1496406090.A.FAD.html
→
06/02 20:22, , 1F
06/02 20:22, 1F
→
06/02 20:22, , 2F
06/02 20:22, 2F
推
06/02 20:22, , 3F
06/02 20:22, 3F
推
06/02 20:23, , 4F
06/02 20:23, 4F
推
06/02 20:23, , 5F
06/02 20:23, 5F
→
06/02 20:23, , 6F
06/02 20:23, 6F
可是去年的RJ也是因為愛受傷魯才不得不用
結果一用下去才發覺超好用
然後騎士才逆轉
我覺得魯至少先用看看效果怎樣吧...
※ 編輯: kyle5241 (1.34.212.7), 06/02/2017 20:25:06
推
06/02 20:24, , 7F
06/02 20:24, 7F
→
06/02 20:24, , 8F
06/02 20:24, 8F
推
06/02 20:26, , 9F
06/02 20:26, 9F
→
06/02 20:26, , 10F
06/02 20:26, 10F
→
06/02 20:27, , 11F
06/02 20:27, 11F
→
06/02 20:27, , 12F
06/02 20:27, 12F
推
06/02 20:27, , 13F
06/02 20:27, 13F
→
06/02 20:28, , 14F
06/02 20:28, 14F
推
06/02 20:29, , 15F
06/02 20:29, 15F
推
06/02 20:29, , 16F
06/02 20:29, 16F
推
06/02 20:29, , 17F
06/02 20:29, 17F
推
06/02 20:30, , 18F
06/02 20:30, 18F
推
06/02 20:30, , 19F
06/02 20:30, 19F
推
06/02 20:31, , 20F
06/02 20:31, 20F
推
06/02 20:31, , 21F
06/02 20:31, 21F
推
06/02 20:31, , 22F
06/02 20:31, 22F
→
06/02 20:31, , 23F
06/02 20:31, 23F
推
06/02 20:32, , 24F
06/02 20:32, 24F
推
06/02 20:33, , 25F
06/02 20:33, 25F
→
06/02 20:34, , 26F
06/02 20:34, 26F
推
06/02 20:38, , 27F
06/02 20:38, 27F
推
06/02 20:39, , 28F
06/02 20:39, 28F
→
06/02 20:41, , 29F
06/02 20:41, 29F
推
06/02 20:45, , 30F
06/02 20:45, 30F
推
06/02 20:46, , 31F
06/02 20:46, 31F
推
06/02 20:47, , 32F
06/02 20:47, 32F
→
06/02 20:49, , 33F
06/02 20:49, 33F
→
06/02 20:49, , 34F
06/02 20:49, 34F
推
06/02 20:52, , 35F
06/02 20:52, 35F
→
06/02 20:52, , 36F
06/02 20:52, 36F
→
06/02 20:53, , 37F
06/02 20:53, 37F
推
06/02 20:54, , 38F
06/02 20:54, 38F
推
06/02 21:02, , 39F
06/02 21:02, 39F
推
06/02 21:06, , 40F
06/02 21:06, 40F
→
06/02 21:06, , 41F
06/02 21:06, 41F
推
06/02 21:07, , 42F
06/02 21:07, 42F
→
06/02 21:07, , 43F
06/02 21:07, 43F
推
06/02 21:10, , 44F
06/02 21:10, 44F
噓
06/02 21:11, , 45F
06/02 21:11, 45F
推
06/02 21:14, , 46F
06/02 21:14, 46F
推
06/02 21:25, , 47F
06/02 21:25, 47F
→
06/02 21:30, , 48F
06/02 21:30, 48F
推
06/02 21:36, , 49F
06/02 21:36, 49F
→
06/02 21:38, , 50F
06/02 21:38, 50F
推
06/02 21:41, , 51F
06/02 21:41, 51F
推
06/02 21:57, , 52F
06/02 21:57, 52F
→
06/02 21:58, , 53F
06/02 21:58, 53F
噓
06/02 22:14, , 54F
06/02 22:14, 54F
→
06/02 22:14, , 55F
06/02 22:14, 55F
推
06/02 22:20, , 56F
06/02 22:20, 56F
→
06/02 22:20, , 57F
06/02 22:20, 57F
→
06/02 22:22, , 58F
06/02 22:22, 58F
→
06/02 22:22, , 59F
06/02 22:22, 59F
→
06/02 22:24, , 60F
06/02 22:24, 60F
推
06/02 22:25, , 61F
06/02 22:25, 61F
→
06/02 22:57, , 62F
06/02 22:57, 62F
→
06/02 23:10, , 63F
06/02 23:10, 63F
→
06/02 23:11, , 64F
06/02 23:11, 64F
→
06/02 23:11, , 65F
06/02 23:11, 65F
噓
06/02 23:49, , 66F
06/02 23:49, 66F
推
06/03 00:19, , 67F
06/03 00:19, 67F
→
06/03 00:19, , 68F
06/03 00:19, 68F
推
06/03 10:44, , 69F
06/03 10:44, 69F
→
06/03 11:32, , 70F
06/03 11:32, 70F
推
06/04 15:54, , 71F
06/04 15:54, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)