Re: [討論] Mike Conley值得一年三千萬吧
※ 引述《KevinLove (Kevin Love)》之銘言:
: Mike Conley 去年簽了五年一億五千萬的合約
: 一堆人說他不值得這個價錢 Conley從未入選過全明星賽
: 但是拿到這個天價合約 大家都說太超過了
: 但是他表現一職都是很穩定 穩穩的打
: 沒有太華麗的動作 太浮誇的運球
: 也沒有太過激情的表現 甚至沒拿過技術犯規
: 也不是隊伍上的王牌 卻是重要的核心人物
: 就像山王的深津一成一樣 能掌握整個隊伍的節奏
: 在這個大控衛時代 比不上 CURRY WESTBROOK HARDEN
: 卻能拿到那麼高的薪水
: 也沒有像CP3 NASH KIDD 這樣靈性的傳球
: 甚至被說是林書豪的地板
: 但他就是能穩穩地讓灰熊成為西區強權
: 他到底值不值得三千萬這個價呢
今年季後也有一位球員要進FA George Hill
可以看看他會拿到怎麼樣的合約
今年成績 G:49 .477/.403/.801 16.9PTS/3.4TRB/4.1AST
對比Conley去年的數據 G:56 .422/.363/.834 15.3PTS/2.9TRB/6.1AST
當然我知道兩位球員打法有些差距 但整體地位應該是類似的
是明星賽邊緣的先發級控衛
已知Hill已經拒絕爵士提出的 88M/3Y
據說Hill方曾經說想追求 132M/4Y的頂級大約
不知道大家看不看好George Hill拿到?
不過 還有一個疑慮是Hill今年小傷不斷 或許才是影響價碼的最大因素
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.112.173.1
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1492934620.A.2A3.html
推
04/23 16:04, , 1F
04/23 16:04, 1F
推
04/23 16:05, , 2F
04/23 16:05, 2F
推
04/23 16:06, , 3F
04/23 16:06, 3F
推
04/23 16:07, , 4F
04/23 16:07, 4F
→
04/23 16:08, , 5F
04/23 16:08, 5F
→
04/23 16:08, , 6F
04/23 16:08, 6F
推
04/23 16:08, , 7F
04/23 16:08, 7F
→
04/23 16:08, , 8F
04/23 16:08, 8F
推
04/23 16:09, , 9F
04/23 16:09, 9F
推
04/23 16:09, , 10F
04/23 16:09, 10F
→
04/23 16:09, , 11F
04/23 16:09, 11F
推
04/23 16:09, , 12F
04/23 16:09, 12F
推
04/23 16:10, , 13F
04/23 16:10, 13F
→
04/23 16:10, , 14F
04/23 16:10, 14F
→
04/23 16:10, , 15F
04/23 16:10, 15F
12M的球員選項 幾乎可視為FA了
→
04/23 16:10, , 16F
04/23 16:10, 16F
→
04/23 16:11, , 17F
04/23 16:11, 17F
※ 編輯: phoenix286 (119.14.80.221), 04/23/2017 16:11:51
推
04/23 16:13, , 18F
04/23 16:13, 18F
→
04/23 16:13, , 19F
04/23 16:13, 19F
推
04/23 16:15, , 20F
04/23 16:15, 20F
推
04/23 16:15, , 21F
04/23 16:15, 21F
→
04/23 16:16, , 22F
04/23 16:16, 22F
→
04/23 16:16, , 23F
04/23 16:16, 23F
推
04/23 16:17, , 24F
04/23 16:17, 24F
→
04/23 16:18, , 25F
04/23 16:18, 25F
推
04/23 16:19, , 26F
04/23 16:19, 26F
推
04/23 16:19, , 27F
04/23 16:19, 27F
推
04/23 16:23, , 28F
04/23 16:23, 28F
→
04/23 16:24, , 29F
04/23 16:24, 29F
→
04/23 16:24, , 30F
04/23 16:24, 30F
→
04/23 16:25, , 31F
04/23 16:25, 31F
推
04/23 16:29, , 32F
04/23 16:29, 32F
→
04/23 16:29, , 33F
04/23 16:29, 33F
→
04/23 16:29, , 34F
04/23 16:29, 34F
→
04/23 16:31, , 35F
04/23 16:31, 35F
推
04/23 16:31, , 36F
04/23 16:31, 36F
→
04/23 16:31, , 37F
04/23 16:31, 37F
推
04/23 16:31, , 38F
04/23 16:31, 38F
→
04/23 16:31, , 39F
04/23 16:31, 39F
推
04/23 16:35, , 40F
04/23 16:35, 40F
→
04/23 16:36, , 41F
04/23 16:36, 41F
→
04/23 16:36, , 42F
04/23 16:36, 42F
推
04/23 16:36, , 43F
04/23 16:36, 43F
→
04/23 16:36, , 44F
04/23 16:36, 44F
→
04/23 16:37, , 45F
04/23 16:37, 45F
→
04/23 16:38, , 46F
04/23 16:38, 46F
→
04/23 16:38, , 47F
04/23 16:38, 47F
→
04/23 16:38, , 48F
04/23 16:38, 48F
→
04/23 16:38, , 49F
04/23 16:38, 49F
→
04/23 16:39, , 50F
04/23 16:39, 50F
→
04/23 16:39, , 51F
04/23 16:39, 51F
推
04/23 16:41, , 52F
04/23 16:41, 52F
→
04/23 16:41, , 53F
04/23 16:41, 53F
→
04/23 16:41, , 54F
04/23 16:41, 54F
→
04/23 16:42, , 55F
04/23 16:42, 55F
推
04/23 16:52, , 56F
04/23 16:52, 56F
→
04/23 16:53, , 57F
04/23 16:53, 57F
推
04/23 17:00, , 58F
04/23 17:00, 58F
推
04/23 17:04, , 59F
04/23 17:04, 59F
推
04/23 17:09, , 60F
04/23 17:09, 60F
推
04/23 17:27, , 61F
04/23 17:27, 61F
→
04/23 17:27, , 62F
04/23 17:27, 62F
→
04/23 17:28, , 63F
04/23 17:28, 63F
推
04/23 17:41, , 64F
04/23 17:41, 64F
推
04/23 18:01, , 65F
04/23 18:01, 65F
→
04/23 18:18, , 66F
04/23 18:18, 66F
推
04/23 18:45, , 67F
04/23 18:45, 67F
推
04/23 18:46, , 68F
04/23 18:46, 68F
→
04/23 18:46, , 69F
04/23 18:46, 69F
推
04/23 18:47, , 70F
04/23 18:47, 70F
推
04/23 18:47, , 71F
04/23 18:47, 71F
推
04/23 19:02, , 72F
04/23 19:02, 72F
推
04/23 19:06, , 73F
04/23 19:06, 73F
推
04/23 20:01, , 74F
04/23 20:01, 74F
→
04/23 20:31, , 75F
04/23 20:31, 75F
→
04/23 20:32, , 76F
04/23 20:32, 76F
推
04/23 20:58, , 77F
04/23 20:58, 77F
→
04/23 21:57, , 78F
04/23 21:57, 78F
→
04/23 22:45, , 79F
04/23 22:45, 79F
推
04/23 23:23, , 80F
04/23 23:23, 80F
推
04/23 23:38, , 81F
04/23 23:38, 81F
推
04/24 00:36, , 82F
04/24 00:36, 82F
推
04/24 01:50, , 83F
04/24 01:50, 83F
推
04/24 04:20, , 84F
04/24 04:20, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):