今天在公司和美國同事聊到LBJ和Barkley互嗆的事
同事提到Barkely有嚴重的賭博成癮
然後他又提到喬丹第一次退休時的背後原因
是因為他也有嚴重的賭博行為
當時的史騰為了保住喬丹在籃球界這塊金字招牌
因此和喬丹協議提前退休避避鋒頭
同時也是變相的禁賽
因為沒聽過喬丹第一次退休是因為賭博
所以好奇之下上網查了一些資料
https://goo.gl/DvL7Jp
上面這篇文提到了一些疑點
包含了當時記者問喬丹是否會復出?
喬丹說了下面這些話:
"Five years down the road,
if the urge comes back,
if the Bulls will have me,
if David Stern lets me back in the league,
I may come back."
謠言指出當時聯盟正在準備調查喬丹賭博的事
所以喬丹和史騰或是聯盟達成了秘密協議
也因此喬丹才會在上面那段話提到史騰
除此之外
還有傳言喬丹在1993年的東區決賽
在第二場對上尼克的比賽前
人還在大西洋城賭博到凌晨(距離紐約大概兩小時車程)
https://goo.gl/vpSpjK
因為是第一次聽到這件事
同事也信誓旦旦的跟我說是真的
所以想和大家討論是否有人聽說過相關的事情?
爬過文似乎沒有討論過
如果違反版規我再自D
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 38.104.172.242
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1485906085.A.488.html
推
02/01 07:45, , 1F
02/01 07:45, 1F
推
02/01 07:47, , 2F
02/01 07:47, 2F
※ 編輯: OPOGOPO (38.104.172.242), 02/01/2017 07:51:16
推
02/01 07:53, , 3F
02/01 07:53, 3F
→
02/01 07:53, , 4F
02/01 07:53, 4F
→
02/01 07:53, , 5F
02/01 07:53, 5F
→
02/01 07:53, , 6F
02/01 07:53, 6F
→
02/01 07:53, , 7F
02/01 07:53, 7F
→
02/01 07:53, , 8F
02/01 07:53, 8F
→
02/01 07:53, , 9F
02/01 07:53, 9F
→
02/01 07:58, , 10F
02/01 07:58, 10F
推
02/01 07:58, , 11F
02/01 07:58, 11F
→
02/01 07:58, , 12F
02/01 07:58, 12F
→
02/01 07:59, , 13F
02/01 07:59, 13F
→
02/01 07:59, , 14F
02/01 07:59, 14F
推
02/01 08:04, , 15F
02/01 08:04, 15F
推
02/01 08:04, , 16F
02/01 08:04, 16F
→
02/01 08:06, , 17F
02/01 08:06, 17F
→
02/01 08:13, , 18F
02/01 08:13, 18F
→
02/01 08:13, , 19F
02/01 08:13, 19F
→
02/01 08:15, , 20F
02/01 08:15, 20F
推
02/01 08:16, , 21F
02/01 08:16, 21F
→
02/01 08:17, , 22F
02/01 08:17, 22F
推
02/01 08:20, , 23F
02/01 08:20, 23F
→
02/01 08:20, , 24F
02/01 08:20, 24F
→
02/01 08:22, , 25F
02/01 08:22, 25F
看了一些網路傳聞
目前是沒看到說MJ直接涉及NBA賭博的說法
只是他第一次退休真的很讓人錯愕
※ 編輯: OPOGOPO (24.103.224.234), 02/01/2017 08:25:56
推
02/01 08:29, , 26F
02/01 08:29, 26F
推
02/01 08:32, , 27F
02/01 08:32, 27F
噓
02/01 08:36, , 28F
02/01 08:36, 28F
→
02/01 08:36, , 29F
02/01 08:36, 29F
推
02/01 08:41, , 30F
02/01 08:41, 30F
推
02/01 08:55, , 31F
02/01 08:55, 31F
推
02/01 08:59, , 32F
02/01 08:59, 32F
推
02/01 09:01, , 33F
02/01 09:01, 33F
推
02/01 09:02, , 34F
02/01 09:02, 34F
→
02/01 09:03, , 35F
02/01 09:03, 35F
推
02/01 09:06, , 36F
02/01 09:06, 36F
→
02/01 09:07, , 37F
02/01 09:07, 37F
推
02/01 09:19, , 38F
02/01 09:19, 38F
推
02/01 09:34, , 39F
02/01 09:34, 39F
推
02/01 09:42, , 40F
02/01 09:42, 40F
推
02/01 09:52, , 41F
02/01 09:52, 41F
推
02/01 10:44, , 42F
02/01 10:44, 42F
→
02/01 10:44, , 43F
02/01 10:44, 43F
推
02/01 10:54, , 44F
02/01 10:54, 44F
推
02/01 10:57, , 45F
02/01 10:57, 45F
推
02/01 11:01, , 46F
02/01 11:01, 46F
推
02/01 11:01, , 47F
02/01 11:01, 47F
推
02/01 11:01, , 48F
02/01 11:01, 48F
推
02/01 11:24, , 49F
02/01 11:24, 49F
噓
02/01 11:28, , 50F
02/01 11:28, 50F
推
02/01 11:52, , 51F
02/01 11:52, 51F
→
02/01 11:52, , 52F
02/01 11:52, 52F
推
02/01 12:04, , 53F
02/01 12:04, 53F
推
02/01 12:11, , 54F
02/01 12:11, 54F
推
02/01 12:11, , 55F
02/01 12:11, 55F
推
02/01 12:11, , 56F
02/01 12:11, 56F
推
02/01 12:19, , 57F
02/01 12:19, 57F
推
02/01 12:27, , 58F
02/01 12:27, 58F
→
02/01 12:28, , 59F
02/01 12:28, 59F
→
02/01 12:29, , 60F
02/01 12:29, 60F
推
02/01 12:56, , 61F
02/01 12:56, 61F
→
02/01 13:06, , 62F
02/01 13:06, 62F
噓
02/01 13:39, , 63F
02/01 13:39, 63F
→
02/01 13:41, , 64F
02/01 13:41, 64F
→
02/01 13:41, , 65F
02/01 13:41, 65F
推
02/01 13:52, , 66F
02/01 13:52, 66F
推
02/01 13:55, , 67F
02/01 13:55, 67F
→
02/01 13:55, , 68F
02/01 13:55, 68F
→
02/01 15:01, , 69F
02/01 15:01, 69F
→
02/01 15:01, , 70F
02/01 15:01, 70F
→
02/01 15:01, , 71F
02/01 15:01, 71F
推
02/01 15:04, , 72F
02/01 15:04, 72F
推
03/20 06:29, , 73F
03/20 06:29, 73F
→
03/20 06:29, , 74F
03/20 06:29, 74F
討論串 (同標題文章)