[討論] Tayshaun Prince的防守怎麼會這麼好?
近年勇士的防守弱點很明顯
就是往全票MVP身上死命打就對了
畢竟相較於其他四個人
Curry是屬於很單薄的類型
所以身形瘦弱的就比較容易被打點嗎?
但是字母哥也是算滿瘦的
今年同位置之中的防守效率卻還是很頂尖
又想當年活塞五虎中的Tayshaun Prince
印象中也是很瘦的(還是其實他很壯?)
還有明星殺手的美稱
Tayshaun Prince的防守怎麼會這麼好?
畢竟瘦的人需要耗費更多力氣去與人碰撞
小王子是靠哪方面的防守技巧來彌補
還是其實當年騎士翻盤活塞
LeBron也是狂打小王子的點才過關的?
--
Sent from myself.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.228.180
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1481464003.A.233.html
推
12/11 21:46, , 1F
12/11 21:46, 1F
推
12/11 21:48, , 2F
12/11 21:48, 2F
→
12/11 21:48, , 3F
12/11 21:48, 3F
推
12/11 21:48, , 4F
12/11 21:48, 4F
→
12/11 21:50, , 5F
12/11 21:50, 5F
推
12/11 21:50, , 6F
12/11 21:50, 6F
→
12/11 21:52, , 7F
12/11 21:52, 7F
→
12/11 21:52, , 8F
12/11 21:52, 8F
推
12/11 21:53, , 9F
12/11 21:53, 9F
推
12/11 21:53, , 10F
12/11 21:53, 10F
推
12/11 21:53, , 11F
12/11 21:53, 11F
→
12/11 21:54, , 12F
12/11 21:54, 12F
推
12/11 21:54, , 13F
12/11 21:54, 13F
噓
12/11 21:54, , 14F
12/11 21:54, 14F
→
12/11 21:54, , 15F
12/11 21:54, 15F
→
12/11 21:55, , 16F
12/11 21:55, 16F
推
12/11 21:56, , 17F
12/11 21:56, 17F
推
12/11 21:57, , 18F
12/11 21:57, 18F
→
12/11 21:58, , 19F
12/11 21:58, 19F
噓
12/11 21:58, , 20F
12/11 21:58, 20F
→
12/11 21:58, , 21F
12/11 21:58, 21F
推
12/11 21:59, , 22F
12/11 21:59, 22F
→
12/11 21:59, , 23F
12/11 21:59, 23F
推
12/11 21:59, , 24F
12/11 21:59, 24F
推
12/11 22:00, , 25F
12/11 22:00, 25F
→
12/11 22:00, , 26F
12/11 22:00, 26F
→
12/11 22:00, , 27F
12/11 22:00, 27F
推
12/11 22:00, , 28F
12/11 22:00, 28F
→
12/11 22:02, , 29F
12/11 22:02, 29F
推
12/11 22:24, , 30F
12/11 22:24, 30F
→
12/11 22:30, , 31F
12/11 22:30, 31F
推
12/11 22:39, , 32F
12/11 22:39, 32F
推
12/11 22:44, , 33F
12/11 22:44, 33F
推
12/11 22:45, , 34F
12/11 22:45, 34F
推
12/11 22:47, , 35F
12/11 22:47, 35F
推
12/11 23:05, , 36F
12/11 23:05, 36F
推
12/11 23:12, , 37F
12/11 23:12, 37F
→
12/11 23:13, , 38F
12/11 23:13, 38F
推
12/11 23:16, , 39F
12/11 23:16, 39F
→
12/11 23:21, , 40F
12/11 23:21, 40F
→
12/11 23:21, , 41F
12/11 23:21, 41F
→
12/11 23:24, , 42F
12/11 23:24, 42F
→
12/11 23:27, , 43F
12/11 23:27, 43F
推
12/11 23:42, , 44F
12/11 23:42, 44F
推
12/11 23:51, , 45F
12/11 23:51, 45F
推
12/12 00:03, , 46F
12/12 00:03, 46F
→
12/12 00:03, , 47F
12/12 00:03, 47F
推
12/12 00:25, , 48F
12/12 00:25, 48F
噓
12/12 01:06, , 49F
12/12 01:06, 49F
推
12/12 01:13, , 50F
12/12 01:13, 50F
→
12/12 01:14, , 51F
12/12 01:14, 51F
推
12/12 01:52, , 52F
12/12 01:52, 52F
推
12/12 02:30, , 53F
12/12 02:30, 53F
推
12/12 02:44, , 54F
12/12 02:44, 54F
推
12/12 03:17, , 55F
12/12 03:17, 55F
推
12/12 04:00, , 56F
12/12 04:00, 56F
推
12/12 08:07, , 57F
12/12 08:07, 57F
→
12/12 08:07, , 58F
12/12 08:07, 58F
→
12/12 11:11, , 59F
12/12 11:11, 59F
推
12/12 13:12, , 60F
12/12 13:12, 60F
推
12/12 13:14, , 61F
12/12 13:14, 61F
→
12/12 13:49, , 62F
12/12 13:49, 62F
→
12/12 13:49, , 63F
12/12 13:49, 63F
噓
12/13 00:53, , 64F
12/13 00:53, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):