[討論] Amar'e Stoudemire和Griffin 評價
Amar'e Stoudemire 從他到尼克後我才開始關注NBA
對於他的印象就是速度快 中距離準 跳不錯高
最近重溫了他和nash在太陽隊的搭配 才知道他也超級會飛
常常一個擋拆就飛扣進去了 和nash有魚幫水水幫魚的感覺
而幹藍哥 幹藍的程度可見一般 也有頂級後位小保羅在旁邊協助
不過保羅船長比較喜歡玩空拋 搭配起來我覺得NASH+滅火器比較有美感+技術
以下是個人不專業評論
滅火器速度和準度都比幹藍哥好 而且會跑出來擋拆
所以和頂級後衛搭配會更有加成效果
但他和nash防守都是洞 只能用進攻來幫助球隊
而且滅火器好像不太會背框 老了跳不夠高就比較難在禁區討生活了
而幹藍哥的灌籃火力似乎是更加威猛 他的彈跳感覺更有爆發力
技巧也比較全面 籃板也威蠻多的 比較起來似乎不輸滅火器
各位覺得呢 同樣在25歲各位GM會選誰?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 119.77.146.143
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1468335461.A.4C0.html
※ 編輯: Vasilii (119.77.146.143), 07/12/2016 22:58:25
推
07/12 22:59, , 1F
07/12 22:59, 1F
推
07/12 22:59, , 2F
07/12 22:59, 2F
→
07/12 22:59, , 3F
07/12 22:59, 3F
推
07/12 22:59, , 4F
07/12 22:59, 4F
→
07/12 23:00, , 5F
07/12 23:00, 5F
※ 編輯: Vasilii (119.77.146.143), 07/12/2016 23:00:50
推
07/12 23:00, , 6F
07/12 23:00, 6F
→
07/12 23:00, , 7F
07/12 23:00, 7F
推
07/12 23:00, , 8F
07/12 23:00, 8F
→
07/12 23:01, , 9F
07/12 23:01, 9F
→
07/12 23:01, , 10F
07/12 23:01, 10F
推
07/12 23:01, , 11F
07/12 23:01, 11F
推
07/12 23:01, , 12F
07/12 23:01, 12F
推
07/12 23:02, , 13F
07/12 23:02, 13F
→
07/12 23:02, , 14F
07/12 23:02, 14F
→
07/12 23:02, , 15F
07/12 23:02, 15F
→
07/12 23:02, , 16F
07/12 23:02, 16F
推
07/12 23:03, , 17F
07/12 23:03, 17F
推
07/12 23:03, , 18F
07/12 23:03, 18F
→
07/12 23:03, , 19F
07/12 23:03, 19F
→
07/12 23:03, , 20F
07/12 23:03, 20F
→
07/12 23:03, , 21F
07/12 23:03, 21F
推
07/12 23:03, , 22F
07/12 23:03, 22F
→
07/12 23:04, , 23F
07/12 23:04, 23F
推
07/12 23:04, , 24F
07/12 23:04, 24F
→
07/12 23:04, , 25F
07/12 23:04, 25F
推
07/12 23:04, , 26F
07/12 23:04, 26F
推
07/12 23:04, , 27F
07/12 23:04, 27F
推
07/12 23:04, , 28F
07/12 23:04, 28F
→
07/12 23:06, , 29F
07/12 23:06, 29F
推
07/12 23:06, , 30F
07/12 23:06, 30F
推
07/12 23:06, , 31F
07/12 23:06, 31F
噓
07/12 23:06, , 32F
07/12 23:06, 32F
→
07/12 23:06, , 33F
07/12 23:06, 33F
推
07/12 23:07, , 34F
07/12 23:07, 34F
推
07/12 23:07, , 35F
07/12 23:07, 35F
→
07/12 23:07, , 36F
07/12 23:07, 36F
推
07/12 23:08, , 37F
07/12 23:08, 37F
→
07/12 23:09, , 38F
07/12 23:09, 38F
還有 173 則推文
→
07/13 02:42, , 212F
07/13 02:42, 212F
→
07/13 02:42, , 213F
07/13 02:42, 213F
→
07/13 02:46, , 214F
07/13 02:46, 214F
推
07/13 04:55, , 215F
07/13 04:55, 215F
推
07/13 04:59, , 216F
07/13 04:59, 216F
推
07/13 05:05, , 217F
07/13 05:05, 217F
推
07/13 05:06, , 218F
07/13 05:06, 218F
→
07/13 07:19, , 219F
07/13 07:19, 219F
推
07/13 07:35, , 220F
07/13 07:35, 220F
推
07/13 07:56, , 221F
07/13 07:56, 221F
→
07/13 07:57, , 222F
07/13 07:57, 222F
→
07/13 07:57, , 223F
07/13 07:57, 223F
→
07/13 08:00, , 224F
07/13 08:00, 224F
推
07/13 08:07, , 225F
07/13 08:07, 225F
→
07/13 08:07, , 226F
07/13 08:07, 226F
推
07/13 08:20, , 227F
07/13 08:20, 227F
→
07/13 08:20, , 228F
07/13 08:20, 228F
推
07/13 08:23, , 229F
07/13 08:23, 229F
推
07/13 08:40, , 230F
07/13 08:40, 230F
推
07/13 08:43, , 231F
07/13 08:43, 231F
推
07/13 08:47, , 232F
07/13 08:47, 232F
推
07/13 08:56, , 233F
07/13 08:56, 233F
推
07/13 09:04, , 234F
07/13 09:04, 234F
→
07/13 09:04, , 235F
07/13 09:04, 235F
推
07/13 09:46, , 236F
07/13 09:46, 236F
→
07/13 09:58, , 237F
07/13 09:58, 237F
推
07/13 10:25, , 238F
07/13 10:25, 238F
推
07/13 10:27, , 239F
07/13 10:27, 239F
→
07/13 10:35, , 240F
07/13 10:35, 240F
推
07/13 10:52, , 241F
07/13 10:52, 241F
→
07/13 10:52, , 242F
07/13 10:52, 242F
推
07/13 10:56, , 243F
07/13 10:56, 243F
推
07/13 10:58, , 244F
07/13 10:58, 244F
推
07/13 11:20, , 245F
07/13 11:20, 245F
推
07/13 12:10, , 246F
07/13 12:10, 246F
噓
07/13 13:02, , 247F
07/13 13:02, 247F
噓
07/13 13:12, , 248F
07/13 13:12, 248F
推
07/13 15:13, , 249F
07/13 15:13, 249F
→
07/14 10:00, , 250F
07/14 10:00, 250F
推
07/21 09:35, , 251F
07/21 09:35, 251F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):