[討論] 聯盟會不會挺的不是雷霆?
聯盟的手到底有無伸入比賽大家可以自行解讀
但無疑的是NBA就是一個SHOW
一個賺錢的工具
而馬刺跟雷霆的這一系列看下來有很多爭議判決
但聯盟挺的真的是雷霆嗎???
2015~2016這是一個可以被另外記載在NBA史頁中的傳奇球季
而這個球季的主角只有一個就是"勇士"
聯盟為了讓這個傳奇更完美,讓NBA至少能趕上NHL & MLB
不至於在北美職業運動淪落在後段班
所以聯盟現在只需要幫助勇士創造屬於NBA的傳奇
那聯盟現在應該要做的是什麼呢???
就是盡量在不明顯的情況下去幫助勇士
在季後賽開始前勇士公認最大的敵人一直都是馬刺
到現在一直都還是
所以........................................這一切到底是???
當然有人會說為什麼東區不先搞掉騎士
不是聯盟不願意~而是其他7隻球隊沒一隻能看的
真的幫下來一定會被看破手腳
所以懇請鄉民~不要再說黑雷了
這根本不是他們能控制的~他不過就是顆棋子
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.233.4.164
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462976831.A.B84.html
推
05/11 22:27, , 1F
05/11 22:27, 1F
推
05/11 22:29, , 2F
05/11 22:29, 2F
推
05/11 22:29, , 3F
05/11 22:29, 3F
推
05/11 22:31, , 4F
05/11 22:31, 4F
→
05/11 22:31, , 5F
05/11 22:31, 5F
我並沒有捧馬刺~整個球季除了勇士外
馬刺就是第二個亮點
今天刺雷誰是勇士的絆腳石~明眼人都看得出來
聯盟更清楚
※ 編輯: smartpaul (118.233.4.164), 05/11/2016 22:33:52
推
05/11 22:32, , 6F
05/11 22:32, 6F
→
05/11 22:32, , 7F
05/11 22:32, 7F
→
05/11 22:32, , 8F
05/11 22:32, 8F
→
05/11 22:32, , 9F
05/11 22:32, 9F
噓
05/11 22:32, , 10F
05/11 22:32, 10F
噓
05/11 22:33, , 11F
05/11 22:33, 11F
噓
05/11 22:33, , 12F
05/11 22:33, 12F
噓
05/11 22:34, , 13F
05/11 22:34, 13F
推
05/11 22:35, , 14F
05/11 22:35, 14F
推
05/11 22:35, , 15F
05/11 22:35, 15F
→
05/11 22:35, , 16F
05/11 22:35, 16F
現在1:3落後的拓荒者,你覺得聯盟真的有挺嗎???
不能因為一兩次的判決就不去懷疑其可能性
※ 編輯: smartpaul (118.233.4.164), 05/11/2016 22:37:33
噓
05/11 22:35, , 17F
05/11 22:35, 17F
噓
05/11 22:36, , 18F
05/11 22:36, 18F
推
05/11 22:36, , 19F
05/11 22:36, 19F
→
05/11 22:36, , 20F
05/11 22:36, 20F
推
05/11 22:37, , 21F
05/11 22:37, 21F
→
05/11 22:37, , 22F
05/11 22:37, 22F
→
05/11 22:37, , 23F
05/11 22:37, 23F
→
05/11 22:37, , 24F
05/11 22:37, 24F
推
05/11 22:37, , 25F
05/11 22:37, 25F
噓
05/11 22:37, , 26F
05/11 22:37, 26F
→
05/11 22:38, , 27F
05/11 22:38, 27F
噓
05/11 22:38, , 28F
05/11 22:38, 28F
→
05/11 22:38, , 29F
05/11 22:38, 29F
→
05/11 22:38, , 30F
05/11 22:38, 30F
→
05/11 22:39, , 31F
05/11 22:39, 31F
推
05/11 22:39, , 32F
05/11 22:39, 32F
噓
05/11 22:40, , 33F
05/11 22:40, 33F
推
05/11 22:40, , 34F
05/11 22:40, 34F
噓
05/11 22:41, , 35F
05/11 22:41, 35F
推
05/11 22:41, , 36F
05/11 22:41, 36F
噓
05/11 22:41, , 37F
05/11 22:41, 37F
推
05/11 22:41, , 38F
05/11 22:41, 38F
→
05/11 22:41, , 39F
05/11 22:41, 39F
推
05/11 22:41, , 40F
05/11 22:41, 40F
→
05/11 22:42, , 41F
05/11 22:42, 41F
→
05/11 22:42, , 42F
05/11 22:42, 42F
→
05/11 22:42, , 43F
05/11 22:42, 43F
噓
05/11 22:44, , 44F
05/11 22:44, 44F
噓
05/11 22:45, , 45F
05/11 22:45, 45F
→
05/11 22:47, , 46F
05/11 22:47, 46F
推
05/11 22:47, , 47F
05/11 22:47, 47F
噓
05/11 22:48, , 48F
05/11 22:48, 48F
就因為我說馬刺威脅性比較大~就被冠上刺迷......請各位理性點
真的就事論事~馬刺整體性還是比雷霆穩
並沒有說雷霆就一定輸馬刺
但若是兩隊挑一個對上勇士
還是馬刺威脅性會比較大
※ 編輯: smartpaul (118.233.4.164), 05/11/2016 22:51:26
→
05/11 22:48, , 49F
05/11 22:48, 49F
推
05/11 22:49, , 50F
05/11 22:49, 50F
噓
05/11 22:52, , 51F
05/11 22:52, 51F
噓
05/11 22:52, , 52F
05/11 22:52, 52F
噓
05/11 22:53, , 53F
05/11 22:53, 53F
噓
05/11 22:53, , 54F
05/11 22:53, 54F
→
05/11 22:53, , 55F
05/11 22:53, 55F
→
05/11 22:54, , 56F
05/11 22:54, 56F
噓
05/11 22:56, , 57F
05/11 22:56, 57F
噓
05/11 23:00, , 58F
05/11 23:00, 58F
推
05/11 23:01, , 59F
05/11 23:01, 59F
→
05/11 23:02, , 60F
05/11 23:02, 60F
噓
05/11 23:05, , 61F
05/11 23:05, 61F
推
05/11 23:20, , 62F
05/11 23:20, 62F
噓
05/11 23:26, , 63F
05/11 23:26, 63F
推
05/11 23:41, , 64F
05/11 23:41, 64F
→
05/11 23:43, , 65F
05/11 23:43, 65F
→
05/11 23:44, , 66F
05/11 23:44, 66F
→
05/11 23:44, , 67F
05/11 23:44, 67F
噓
05/11 23:45, , 68F
05/11 23:45, 68F
噓
05/11 23:50, , 69F
05/11 23:50, 69F
→
05/11 23:51, , 70F
05/11 23:51, 70F
→
05/11 23:52, , 71F
05/11 23:52, 71F
噓
05/12 00:00, , 72F
05/12 00:00, 72F
→
05/12 00:05, , 73F
05/12 00:05, 73F
噓
05/12 00:07, , 74F
05/12 00:07, 74F
→
05/12 00:14, , 75F
05/12 00:14, 75F
→
05/12 00:27, , 76F
05/12 00:27, 76F
→
05/12 00:28, , 77F
05/12 00:28, 77F
→
05/12 00:28, , 78F
05/12 00:28, 78F
噓
05/12 00:40, , 79F
05/12 00:40, 79F
噓
05/12 01:03, , 80F
05/12 01:03, 80F
噓
05/12 01:05, , 81F
05/12 01:05, 81F
噓
05/12 01:13, , 82F
05/12 01:13, 82F
噓
05/12 02:13, , 83F
05/12 02:13, 83F
噓
05/12 03:58, , 84F
05/12 03:58, 84F
推
05/12 04:15, , 85F
05/12 04:15, 85F
→
05/12 04:15, , 86F
05/12 04:15, 86F
→
05/12 04:15, , 87F
05/12 04:15, 87F
推
05/12 04:16, , 88F
05/12 04:16, 88F
→
05/12 04:16, , 89F
05/12 04:16, 89F
噓
05/12 07:21, , 90F
05/12 07:21, 90F
→
05/12 07:21, , 91F
05/12 07:21, 91F
噓
05/12 08:09, , 92F
05/12 08:09, 92F
噓
05/12 09:38, , 93F
05/12 09:38, 93F