Re: [新聞] 回應「非球星」言論 里拉德:表現說明一切
前文43
僅針對以下這句推文來提供一點數據
推 fongmcn : 這正是我想說的 常常看他鐵打到爆但贏球 05/08 20:15
→ fongmcn : 有時會準但多數輸球 球隊成績和他關係不大 05/08 20:16
Lillard是否常常鐵打到爆但贏球?
Lillard是否有時會準但多數輸球??
球隊成績是否與Lillard關係不大???
我們往下看好了
FG40%以下的算鐵打了對吧
http://goo.gl/DUurUQ 本季Lillard FG40%以下阿拓的戰績是14W21L
在往上拉一點到43%好了
FG43%以下
http://goo.gl/Ghhjks 16W24L
FG43%以上
http://goo.gl/3oapnN 24W11L
那我們在往上拉一點到45%好了
FG45%以下
http://goo.gl/SZzuHm 19W26L
FG45%以上
http://goo.gl/yS5SH2 21W8L
好啦~我們在往上拉到50%以上,看看是不是他常常很準但球隊輸球
但50%以上不能在多了
http://goo.gl/ooOeBY 11W5L
咦??? 怎麼完全和您所說的不一樣勒?怎麼Lillard打鐵到爆但阿拓還是輸多贏少
Lillard準度夠但阿拓也是勝多敗少呢?您看到這裡是否還覺得阿拓戰績跟Lillard
關係不大呢???
我想也許你只是看了季末Lillard狀態不好而阿拓還是贏球居多,所以會有這種觀點
吧,這也難免,畢竟您是火箭迷,偶而看看阿拓的BOX難免會有印象派也是很正常啦
以下在提供一些數據
http://goo.gl/zuzvFe
這季Lillard打了75場,在這75場裡所贏的40場,Lillard的FG有45%,而三分有40%的命中
率,在輸的35場裡,Lillard的FG只有38.6%,三分則下滑到34%
當然 身為一個拓迷也知道Lillard的出手選擇有時真的很差沒錯,如果他能在聰明一點
慎選出手選擇的話,我想他的評價會更高
以上
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.137.108.125
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462714922.A.C45.html
推
05/08 21:44, , 1F
05/08 21:44, 1F
推
05/08 21:45, , 2F
05/08 21:45, 2F
推
05/08 21:45, , 3F
05/08 21:45, 3F
推
05/08 21:46, , 4F
05/08 21:46, 4F
推
05/08 21:46, , 5F
05/08 21:46, 5F
→
05/08 21:47, , 6F
05/08 21:47, 6F
推
05/08 21:48, , 7F
05/08 21:48, 7F
推
05/08 21:50, , 8F
05/08 21:50, 8F
推
05/08 21:56, , 9F
05/08 21:56, 9F
※ 編輯: CHUNGHUA (220.137.108.125), 05/08/2016 21:59:28
→
05/08 21:59, , 10F
05/08 21:59, 10F
推
05/08 22:00, , 11F
05/08 22:00, 11F
推
05/08 22:02, , 12F
05/08 22:02, 12F
→
05/08 22:04, , 13F
05/08 22:04, 13F
推
05/08 22:09, , 14F
05/08 22:09, 14F
推
05/08 22:10, , 15F
05/08 22:10, 15F
推
05/08 22:11, , 16F
05/08 22:11, 16F
推
05/08 22:12, , 17F
05/08 22:12, 17F
推
05/08 22:17, , 18F
05/08 22:17, 18F
推
05/08 22:20, , 19F
05/08 22:20, 19F
推
05/08 22:22, , 20F
05/08 22:22, 20F
推
05/08 22:24, , 21F
05/08 22:24, 21F
推
05/08 22:25, , 22F
05/08 22:25, 22F
推
05/08 22:25, , 23F
05/08 22:25, 23F
推
05/08 22:26, , 24F
05/08 22:26, 24F
推
05/08 22:28, , 25F
05/08 22:28, 25F
推
05/08 22:29, , 26F
05/08 22:29, 26F
推
05/08 22:30, , 27F
05/08 22:30, 27F
推
05/08 22:31, , 28F
05/08 22:31, 28F
推
05/08 22:32, , 29F
05/08 22:32, 29F
推
05/08 22:32, , 30F
05/08 22:32, 30F
推
05/08 22:32, , 31F
05/08 22:32, 31F
推
05/08 22:33, , 32F
05/08 22:33, 32F
→
05/08 22:34, , 33F
05/08 22:34, 33F
→
05/08 22:38, , 34F
05/08 22:38, 34F
推
05/08 22:40, , 35F
05/08 22:40, 35F
→
05/08 22:41, , 36F
05/08 22:41, 36F
推
05/08 22:44, , 37F
05/08 22:44, 37F
推
05/08 22:47, , 38F
05/08 22:47, 38F
推
05/08 22:49, , 39F
05/08 22:49, 39F
→
05/08 22:50, , 40F
05/08 22:50, 40F
推
05/08 22:52, , 41F
05/08 22:52, 41F
推
05/08 22:53, , 42F
05/08 22:53, 42F
推
05/08 22:57, , 43F
05/08 22:57, 43F
推
05/08 23:07, , 44F
05/08 23:07, 44F
推
05/08 23:14, , 45F
05/08 23:14, 45F
推
05/08 23:15, , 46F
05/08 23:15, 46F
→
05/08 23:15, , 47F
05/08 23:15, 47F
推
05/08 23:15, , 48F
05/08 23:15, 48F
→
05/08 23:16, , 49F
05/08 23:16, 49F
→
05/08 23:16, , 50F
05/08 23:16, 50F
推
05/08 23:21, , 51F
05/08 23:21, 51F
推
05/08 23:22, , 52F
05/08 23:22, 52F
推
05/08 23:28, , 53F
05/08 23:28, 53F
→
05/08 23:32, , 54F
05/08 23:32, 54F
推
05/08 23:39, , 55F
05/08 23:39, 55F
→
05/08 23:39, , 56F
05/08 23:39, 56F
推
05/08 23:42, , 57F
05/08 23:42, 57F
推
05/08 23:56, , 58F
05/08 23:56, 58F
推
05/08 23:58, , 59F
05/08 23:58, 59F
推
05/09 00:00, , 60F
05/09 00:00, 60F
推
05/09 00:21, , 61F
05/09 00:21, 61F
推
05/09 00:28, , 62F
05/09 00:28, 62F
→
05/09 00:30, , 63F
05/09 00:30, 63F
推
05/09 01:06, , 64F
05/09 01:06, 64F
推
05/09 01:14, , 65F
05/09 01:14, 65F
推
05/09 01:31, , 66F
05/09 01:31, 66F
推
05/09 01:36, , 67F
05/09 01:36, 67F
推
05/09 01:57, , 68F
05/09 01:57, 68F
推
05/09 02:21, , 69F
05/09 02:21, 69F
推
05/09 03:59, , 70F
05/09 03:59, 70F
推
05/09 05:27, , 71F
05/09 05:27, 71F
推
05/09 06:28, , 72F
05/09 06:28, 72F
推
05/09 06:34, , 73F
05/09 06:34, 73F
推
05/09 07:58, , 74F
05/09 07:58, 74F
推
05/09 08:10, , 75F
05/09 08:10, 75F
推
05/09 08:23, , 76F
05/09 08:23, 76F
推
05/09 10:30, , 77F
05/09 10:30, 77F
推
05/09 11:07, , 78F
05/09 11:07, 78F
→
05/09 12:56, , 79F
05/09 12:56, 79F
→
05/09 12:56, , 80F
05/09 12:56, 80F
→
05/10 15:04, , 81F
05/10 15:04, 81F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):