Re: [情報] 老鷹不滿騎士刷三分紀錄 LBJ：勇士還73勝呢
老實說每個人的英文程度不同，看到一句話能不能理解他想表達的意思也不一定
尤其是翻譯這種事情。如果只是直直的翻譯的話保證會失去許多原作者想表達的意思
※ 引述《s90523 (小楓)》之銘言：
: 特地找了原文來看，看不出來老鷹球員有什麼不滿。
: 以下原文網址 https://goo.gl/wrpylR
: ※ 引述《idk ( ‼ )》之銘言：
: : 消息來源：http://xw.qq.com/c/sports/20160506059464
: : 內容：騎士與老鷹東區準決賽第3戰明日打響。而在賽前，兩隊球員針對騎士在第2戰狂投
: : 三分刷紀錄一事打起了嘴仗。對此，James回應道，勇士在贏下第72場後，難道就不應該
: : 追求73勝嗎？
: : 東區準決賽次戰，騎士外線手感爆棚，首節8記三分，半場投中18個三分，三節打到一半
: : ，他們已經投中了第21個三分，平了季後賽單場三分球命中數紀錄。當時騎士大比分領先
: : ，不過他們繼續遠投，最終以25個三分打破歷史單場三分紀錄（包括例行賽和季後賽）。
: The Cavaliers made 25 on the night, the most in NBA history for a game,
: playoff or regular-season.
: : 對於騎士大比分領先之下刷三分紀錄，老鷹眾將很是不滿。「如果當時換做是我們，我們
: : 也許不會像他們那麼做的。」Horford說道，「這很難說，但我會說不應該這麼做。」
: Hawks big man Al Horford echoed his frontcourt mate's sentiments.
: "We probably wouldn't do anything like that [if we were in that position],"
: he told cleveland.com. "...It's hard to say, but I would say no."
: Horford明明是針對如果老鷹在相同狀況下，
: 可能不會這樣做，請問哪裡有說騎士不該如此呢，
: 而且原文中Horford是在附和Millsap的發言，
: 老鷹系統如此並不代表其他隊也應該要這樣做。
這段就是在表達如果老鷹的話，他們不會這麼做。
英文用I wouldn't do anything like that 就是委婉的說對方不應該這麼做
換句話說就是他同意Millsap 的話，他也認為騎士不應該在那個情況下繼續投三分破紀錄
: : 「我並不會為此感到生氣，只是繼續保持我的職業態度。」Millsap說道，「如果你想那
: : 樣去破紀錄，那就那麼做吧。我們球隊有自己的精神，如果我們遇到這樣的事情，是不會
: : 繼續投三分球的，但其他球隊未必如此。所以，你能怎麼做呢？」
: "It's a certain way of being a professional," the Hawks' Paul Millsap said to
: cleveland.com. "I'm not mad about it, but just being professionals man. If
: that's how you want to approach it, that's how you approach it. I think our
: team and our organization has class and I don't think we would have continued
: to do that, but other organizations do other things so what can you do about
: it?"
: Millsap的發言就翻譯的差不多。
這邊翻譯的反而沒有原文說的語氣那麼重
Millsap 說 "...I think our team and organization has class...but other organization do other things...."
這真要翻的話是說米爺認為老鷹隊有格調，不會去做那種事（指在那種情況下去破紀錄），但其他的組織就不知道了。
這不是明著說騎士隊沒格調？ Cavs got no class?
這很明顯是氣話啊！
: : 相比Horford和Millsap，老鷹悍將Bazemore的語氣要更重。「我相信凡事都有因果循環。
: : 」Bazemore說道，「這次他們破了三分紀錄，說不定很快就輪到我們了。每個人都知道他
: : 們是怎麼打球的，當他們領先時，就變成了完全不同的一支球隊。我們會再次碰面的，這
: : 只是系列賽第2場，並不是第4場。他們想要真正慶祝，得先再贏下我們兩場再說。」
: "I'm a firm believer in karma," the small forward said to cleveland.com.
: "Maybe we'll be the team to break that record soon. Everyone knows how they
: play. They get out in front and they're a totally different team. It is what
: it is. We'll see them again. That wasn't Game 4. That was only Game 2. They
: still have to beat us two more times before they can really celebrate
: anything."
: 老實說不知道Bazemore這樣講有什麼問題，
: 他既沒批評騎士不應該繼續投，
: 也只是說系列賽還沒打完，騎士就算要慶祝也是要等晉級也沒錯啊，
: 就算知道很難贏，但難道要唱雖自己球隊嗎?
因為 Bazemore 暗指騎士隊這樣做會遭報應啊
Karma 就是因果報應。在這種情況下你說你相信因果報應
不就是說明了你覺得騎士隊做了了不好的事情？
: 雖然老鷹目前為止打是真的爛透了，
: 但就只是接受訪問針對騎士破紀錄有什麼看法而已，
: 也沒有不爽騎士在垃圾時間繼續破紀錄。
當然啦，即使我在國外打混十幾年了也可能會讀錯意思
我們來看看國外的鄉民怎麼看待這篇
評價第一：
I'm so baffled by this. What the fuck are they saying.
我真他X的不懂他們在說啥
First, in a playoff game, thinking they should let off the brakes is ridiculous. We've seen some crazy chokes this year. In little league, running up the score might be a problem, in the NBA playoffs,
這邊講說他認為老鷹隊的球員覺得應該被放一馬的想法很荒唐
With that being said... **the Cavs benched their starters for the 4th**. They *didn't* run up the score, *or* the record! This is a really pathetic gripe for these players. If they had left JR smith i
probably the safest thing a winning team can do. Why would they risk sending Kyrie to the basket, for some angry bench Hawk player to give him a hard foul in a won game? The Cavs did the sensible thin
這邊很長。大意是說騎士隊又不是故意要破紀錄。都放板凳中的板凳了。況且大比數贏的情況下投三分是最能保護球員的作法
I guess these Hawks players are just trying to get hyped for next game... "they disrespected us" and stuff. But leave that to the locker room. They look totally ridiculous in the media.
說老鷹隊的球員可能是想為第三戰先點燃戰火
但在媒體上說這些真是大失水準
評論第二名：
Seriously though, the guys that played the fourth quarter are our third stringers at best. If your fragile ego can't handle Dahntay Jones and Old Man Mo Williams hitting threes, play some fucking defe
同樣的，也是說第四節根本就是板凳中的板凳，如果老鷹隊的自尊被傷到的話應該在防守上加強。
If anything, them standing around chucking is what allowed the Hawks to get the deficit under 40 and then under 30.
如果要抱怨的話，怎麼不看看騎士隊在那邊浪投三分才讓老鷹隊從負40分到負25分
評論第三名：
Call me old fashioned, but how about you play some defence next time instead of complaining?
可能我是老古板，與其在這邊抱怨還不如他X的下一場防守好一點
節錄到這。國外鄉民也對老鷹的言論看不下去頻頻砲轟
就你在那邊說別人讀心術…
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 166.176.185.16
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462547862.A.03C.html
→
05/06 23:19, , 1F
05/06 23:19, 1F
→
05/06 23:20, , 2F
05/06 23:20, 2F
推
05/06 23:21, , 3F
05/06 23:21, 3F
推
05/06 23:22, , 4F
05/06 23:22, 4F
噓
05/06 23:25, , 5F
05/06 23:25, 5F
推
05/06 23:25, , 6F
05/06 23:25, 6F
推
05/06 23:26, , 7F
05/06 23:26, 7F
推
05/06 23:27, , 8F
05/06 23:27, 8F
推
05/06 23:28, , 9F
05/06 23:28, 9F
推
05/06 23:28, , 10F
05/06 23:28, 10F
推
05/06 23:28, , 11F
05/06 23:28, 11F
→
05/06 23:28, , 12F
05/06 23:28, 12F
推
05/06 23:28, , 13F
05/06 23:28, 13F
推
05/06 23:29, , 14F
05/06 23:29, 14F
推
05/06 23:30, , 15F
05/06 23:30, 15F
→
05/06 23:30, , 16F
05/06 23:30, 16F
推
05/06 23:31, , 17F
05/06 23:31, 17F
推
05/06 23:34, , 18F
05/06 23:34, 18F
→
05/06 23:34, , 19F
05/06 23:34, 19F
噓
05/06 23:34, , 20F
05/06 23:34, 20F
→
05/06 23:35, , 21F
05/06 23:35, 21F
推
05/06 23:36, , 22F
05/06 23:36, 22F
→
05/06 23:36, , 23F
05/06 23:36, 23F
推
05/06 23:36, , 24F
05/06 23:36, 24F
推
05/06 23:36, , 25F
05/06 23:36, 25F
推
05/06 23:37, , 26F
05/06 23:37, 26F
推
05/06 23:38, , 27F
05/06 23:38, 27F
推
05/06 23:39, , 28F
05/06 23:39, 28F
噓
05/06 23:40, , 29F
05/06 23:40, 29F
推
05/06 23:41, , 30F
05/06 23:41, 30F
推
05/06 23:43, , 31F
05/06 23:43, 31F
推
05/06 23:44, , 32F
05/06 23:44, 32F
噓
05/06 23:45, , 33F
05/06 23:45, 33F
→
05/06 23:46, , 34F
05/06 23:46, 34F
不好意思喔 這是Reddit NBA版的言論
帶風向也要有所本好嗎？
推
05/06 23:46, , 35F
05/06 23:46, 35F
→
05/06 23:46, , 36F
05/06 23:46, 36F
推
05/06 23:47, , 37F
05/06 23:47, 37F
→
05/06 23:49, , 38F
05/06 23:49, 38F
還有 32 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
05/07 00:44, , 71F
05/07 00:44, 71F
推
05/07 00:47, , 72F
05/07 00:47, 72F
→
05/07 00:47, , 73F
05/07 00:47, 73F
推
05/07 00:49, , 74F
05/07 00:49, 74F
→
05/07 00:50, , 75F
05/07 00:50, 75F
→
05/07 00:51, , 76F
05/07 00:51, 76F
推
05/07 00:52, , 77F
05/07 00:52, 77F
推
05/07 00:53, , 78F
05/07 00:53, 78F
推
05/07 00:53, , 79F
05/07 00:53, 79F
推
05/07 00:55, , 80F
05/07 00:55, 80F
噓
05/07 01:00, , 81F
05/07 01:00, 81F
→
05/07 01:00, , 82F
05/07 01:00, 82F
→
05/07 01:00, , 83F
05/07 01:00, 83F
推
05/07 01:00, , 84F
05/07 01:00, 84F
推
05/07 01:05, , 85F
05/07 01:05, 85F
→
05/07 01:05, , 86F
05/07 01:05, 86F
推
05/07 01:25, , 87F
05/07 01:25, 87F
→
05/07 01:26, , 88F
05/07 01:26, 88F
推
05/07 01:26, , 89F
05/07 01:26, 89F
→
05/07 01:27, , 90F
05/07 01:27, 90F
→
05/07 01:27, , 91F
05/07 01:27, 91F
噓
05/07 01:39, , 92F
05/07 01:39, 92F
推
05/07 01:46, , 93F
05/07 01:46, 93F
推
05/07 02:02, , 94F
05/07 02:02, 94F
→
05/07 02:04, , 95F
05/07 02:04, 95F
推
05/07 03:04, , 96F
05/07 03:04, 96F
推
05/07 03:33, , 97F
05/07 03:33, 97F
→
05/07 03:33, , 98F
05/07 03:33, 98F
推
05/07 06:10, , 99F
05/07 06:10, 99F
推
05/07 06:49, , 100F
05/07 06:49, 100F
→
05/07 06:50, , 101F
05/07 06:50, 101F
推
05/07 07:05, , 102F
05/07 07:05, 102F
推
05/07 09:28, , 103F
05/07 09:28, 103F
→
05/07 09:28, , 104F
05/07 09:28, 104F
推
05/07 12:50, , 105F
05/07 12:50, 105F
→
05/07 13:10, , 106F
05/07 13:10, 106F
推
05/07 13:52, , 107F
05/07 13:52, 107F
推
05/07 14:22, , 108F
05/07 14:22, 108F
推
05/07 14:38, , 109F
05/07 14:38, 109F
→
05/07 14:38, , 110F
05/07 14:38, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇)：