[外電] Would Joe Johnson welcome a buyout?
※ [本文轉錄自 Nets 看板 #1Mllgmle ]
作者: JoeJohnson (不平凡的Joe) 看板: Nets
標題: [外電] Would Joe Johnson welcome a buyout?
時間: Sat Feb 13 17:43:05 2016
Would Joe Johnson welcome a buyout?
籃網在全明星賽的最後一場比賽結束之後,也即將接近交易期底限,Joe Johnson
告訴記者:"我不知道在這之後會發生什麼,就順其自然,任何事都有可能的。"
這個訊息是否表示Joe希望籃網把自己被交易或買斷?有些人相信是這樣。
一位籃球業內人士Moke Hamilton 曾寫說,Johnson 非常可能會被買斷,
這也是因為他那將近2500萬的合約是難以交易的。
很不幸的,就像季初有某個稱聲說"並不是這裡不好" 的那個人一樣。
同時,克里夫蘭網站作家Chris Hynes曾說,"如果Joe Johnson 在籃網尋求買斷,
聯盟的消息來源指出克里夫蘭將會爭取以老將最低薪簽下他。"
克里夫蘭對於Johnson 有興趣已經不是什麼新的消息。回到去年七月,記者就曾在
傳說籃網與騎士在討論可能的交易,只是最後沒有進展。
Johnson 連續九年打入季後賽,而且也35歲了,贏得冠軍對一位老將來說似乎是最
重要的事。
籃網隊在三月一日以前可以決定是否要放棄Johnson。而現在他們有一位新總管,
他可以決定是否值得放棄Johnson,就像當時與Deron Williams 所做的一樣。
原文:http://goo.gl/mlmd31
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.224.139.193
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Nets/M.1455356592.A.BE8.html
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: JoeJohnson (36.224.139.193), 02/13/2016 17:45:28
推
02/13 17:46, , 1F
02/13 17:46, 1F
噓
02/13 17:47, , 2F
02/13 17:47, 2F
推
02/13 17:47, , 3F
02/13 17:47, 3F
推
02/13 17:47, , 4F
02/13 17:47, 4F
推
02/13 17:50, , 5F
02/13 17:50, 5F
噓
02/13 17:51, , 6F
02/13 17:51, 6F
→
02/13 17:51, , 7F
02/13 17:51, 7F
→
02/13 17:51, , 8F
02/13 17:51, 8F
噓
02/13 17:52, , 9F
02/13 17:52, 9F
推
02/13 17:53, , 10F
02/13 17:53, 10F
推
02/13 17:54, , 11F
02/13 17:54, 11F
推
02/13 17:54, , 12F
02/13 17:54, 12F
→
02/13 17:55, , 13F
02/13 17:55, 13F
→
02/13 17:55, , 14F
02/13 17:55, 14F
推
02/13 17:58, , 15F
02/13 17:58, 15F
推
02/13 17:58, , 16F
02/13 17:58, 16F
推
02/13 17:58, , 17F
02/13 17:58, 17F
→
02/13 18:05, , 18F
02/13 18:05, 18F
推
02/13 18:06, , 19F
02/13 18:06, 19F
→
02/13 18:06, , 20F
02/13 18:06, 20F
推
02/13 18:09, , 21F
02/13 18:09, 21F
推
02/13 18:13, , 22F
02/13 18:13, 22F
推
02/13 18:16, , 23F
02/13 18:16, 23F
推
02/13 18:17, , 24F
02/13 18:17, 24F
推
02/13 18:19, , 25F
02/13 18:19, 25F
推
02/13 18:20, , 26F
02/13 18:20, 26F
→
02/13 18:23, , 27F
02/13 18:23, 27F
推
02/13 18:26, , 28F
02/13 18:26, 28F
推
02/13 18:28, , 29F
02/13 18:28, 29F
推
02/13 18:28, , 30F
02/13 18:28, 30F
→
02/13 18:28, , 31F
02/13 18:28, 31F
推
02/13 18:29, , 32F
02/13 18:29, 32F
噓
02/13 18:51, , 33F
02/13 18:51, 33F
推
02/13 18:52, , 34F
02/13 18:52, 34F
→
02/13 18:53, , 35F
02/13 18:53, 35F
推
02/13 18:56, , 36F
02/13 18:56, 36F
推
02/13 19:20, , 37F
02/13 19:20, 37F
推
02/13 19:24, , 38F
02/13 19:24, 38F
推
02/13 19:53, , 39F
02/13 19:53, 39F
推
02/13 20:02, , 40F
02/13 20:02, 40F
推
02/13 20:11, , 41F
02/13 20:11, 41F
推
02/13 20:20, , 42F
02/13 20:20, 42F
推
02/13 20:23, , 43F
02/13 20:23, 43F
→
02/13 20:23, , 44F
02/13 20:23, 44F
→
02/13 20:26, , 45F
02/13 20:26, 45F
推
02/13 20:27, , 46F
02/13 20:27, 46F
→
02/13 20:27, , 47F
02/13 20:27, 47F
推
02/13 20:27, , 48F
02/13 20:27, 48F
→
02/13 20:28, , 49F
02/13 20:28, 49F
→
02/13 20:29, , 50F
02/13 20:29, 50F
→
02/13 20:29, , 51F
02/13 20:29, 51F
→
02/13 20:31, , 52F
02/13 20:31, 52F
推
02/13 20:48, , 53F
02/13 20:48, 53F
→
02/13 20:48, , 54F
02/13 20:48, 54F
推
02/13 21:05, , 55F
02/13 21:05, 55F
推
02/13 21:27, , 56F
02/13 21:27, 56F
推
02/13 21:35, , 57F
02/13 21:35, 57F
推
02/13 23:03, , 58F
02/13 23:03, 58F
推
02/14 02:43, , 59F
02/14 02:43, 59F
推
02/14 06:29, , 60F
02/14 06:29, 60F
→
02/14 07:24, , 61F
02/14 07:24, 61F
推
02/14 07:43, , 62F
02/14 07:43, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):