[討論] Michael Jordan 是數據最好的player?
籃球之神喬丹的地位,大家應該無庸置疑,在現實世界中(非ptt),公認史上第一人,
但我想請問數據派的,喬丹的數據是史上最好的嗎?如果不是,年輕贏球迷一定會問,
他憑什麼當史上第一人,應該要還給數據最好的球員一個公道才對,只有撥亂反正,
訂下規矩, 大家才能取得共識,就不用天天發廢文戰來戰去,直接po數據,
成王敗寇,一目了然,何不快哉?大家說這樣好不好啊 (*〞︶〝*)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.34.108.114
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1454839941.A.655.html
噓
02/07 18:13, , 1F
02/07 18:13, 1F
→
02/07 18:14, , 2F
02/07 18:14, 2F
噓
02/07 18:14, , 3F
02/07 18:14, 3F
噓
02/07 18:15, , 4F
02/07 18:15, 4F
噓
02/07 18:17, , 5F
02/07 18:17, 5F
→
02/07 18:17, , 6F
02/07 18:17, 6F
噓
02/07 18:18, , 7F
02/07 18:18, 7F
噓
02/07 18:20, , 8F
02/07 18:20, 8F
推
02/07 18:20, , 9F
02/07 18:20, 9F
噓
02/07 18:21, , 10F
02/07 18:21, 10F
→
02/07 18:21, , 11F
02/07 18:21, 11F
→
02/07 18:21, , 12F
02/07 18:21, 12F
噓
02/07 18:23, , 13F
02/07 18:23, 13F
噓
02/07 18:24, , 14F
02/07 18:24, 14F
噓
02/07 18:27, , 15F
02/07 18:27, 15F
噓
02/07 18:30, , 16F
02/07 18:30, 16F
噓
02/07 18:43, , 17F
02/07 18:43, 17F
我圍爐完回來了,吃得好飽哦^^,可是我發現你們很奇怪耶,平常那麼喜歡講數據,
碰到喬丹就被打臉,不敢數據定輸贏了,這不是前後矛盾嗎(._.?)這樣的話,
咖哩母獅就算數據再好,也沒有用啊(*〝︵〞*)
噓
02/07 18:52, , 18F
02/07 18:52, 18F
噓
02/07 18:55, , 19F
02/07 18:55, 19F
噓
02/07 18:56, , 20F
02/07 18:56, 20F
噓
02/07 18:57, , 21F
02/07 18:57, 21F
噓
02/07 18:58, , 22F
02/07 18:58, 22F
噓
02/07 19:03, , 23F
02/07 19:03, 23F
噓
02/07 19:06, , 24F
02/07 19:06, 24F
→
02/07 19:13, , 25F
02/07 19:13, 25F
噓
02/07 19:16, , 26F
02/07 19:16, 26F
噓
02/07 19:17, , 27F
02/07 19:17, 27F
噓
02/07 19:19, , 28F
02/07 19:19, 28F
噓
02/07 19:20, , 29F
02/07 19:20, 29F
推
02/07 19:22, , 30F
02/07 19:22, 30F
→
02/07 19:23, , 31F
02/07 19:23, 31F
噓
02/07 19:31, , 32F
02/07 19:31, 32F
噓
02/07 19:35, , 33F
02/07 19:35, 33F
推
02/07 19:42, , 34F
02/07 19:42, 34F
推
02/07 19:45, , 35F
02/07 19:45, 35F
噓
02/07 19:45, , 36F
02/07 19:45, 36F
噓
02/07 19:47, , 37F
02/07 19:47, 37F
※ 編輯: goodtim (114.34.108.114), 02/07/2016 19:54:28
噓
02/07 19:58, , 38F
02/07 19:58, 38F
推
02/07 20:01, , 39F
02/07 20:01, 39F
噓
02/07 20:21, , 40F
02/07 20:21, 40F
推
02/07 20:28, , 41F
02/07 20:28, 41F
推
02/07 20:33, , 42F
02/07 20:33, 42F
噓
02/07 20:35, , 43F
02/07 20:35, 43F
噓
02/07 20:41, , 44F
02/07 20:41, 44F
噓
02/07 20:43, , 45F
02/07 20:43, 45F
噓
02/07 20:45, , 46F
02/07 20:45, 46F
→
02/07 20:45, , 47F
02/07 20:45, 47F
→
02/07 20:45, , 48F
02/07 20:45, 48F
→
02/07 20:45, , 49F
02/07 20:45, 49F
噓
02/07 20:54, , 50F
02/07 20:54, 50F
噓
02/07 21:15, , 51F
02/07 21:15, 51F
噓
02/07 21:25, , 52F
02/07 21:25, 52F
推
02/07 21:42, , 53F
02/07 21:42, 53F
噓
02/07 21:43, , 54F
02/07 21:43, 54F
噓
02/07 21:44, , 55F
02/07 21:44, 55F
→
02/07 21:44, , 56F
02/07 21:44, 56F
噓
02/07 21:44, , 57F
02/07 21:44, 57F
噓
02/07 21:47, , 58F
02/07 21:47, 58F
噓
02/07 21:50, , 59F
02/07 21:50, 59F
→
02/07 21:50, , 60F
02/07 21:50, 60F
推
02/07 22:45, , 61F
02/07 22:45, 61F
噓
02/07 22:46, , 62F
02/07 22:46, 62F
噓
02/07 23:19, , 63F
02/07 23:19, 63F
噓
02/07 23:31, , 64F
02/07 23:31, 64F
噓
02/07 23:57, , 65F
02/07 23:57, 65F
推
02/08 00:03, , 66F
02/08 00:03, 66F
噓
02/08 00:06, , 67F
02/08 00:06, 67F
噓
02/08 00:16, , 68F
02/08 00:16, 68F
噓
02/08 00:17, , 69F
02/08 00:17, 69F
噓
02/08 01:06, , 70F
02/08 01:06, 70F
→
02/08 01:08, , 71F
02/08 01:08, 71F
→
02/08 01:21, , 72F
02/08 01:21, 72F
噓
02/08 01:39, , 73F
02/08 01:39, 73F
推
02/08 01:44, , 74F
02/08 01:44, 74F
→
02/08 02:13, , 75F
02/08 02:13, 75F
噓
02/08 02:31, , 76F
02/08 02:31, 76F
推
02/08 02:36, , 77F
02/08 02:36, 77F
→
02/08 02:37, , 78F
02/08 02:37, 78F
噓
02/08 03:02, , 79F
02/08 03:02, 79F
噓
02/08 09:34, , 80F
02/08 09:34, 80F
噓
02/08 10:10, , 81F
02/08 10:10, 81F
噓
02/08 10:13, , 82F
02/08 10:13, 82F
噓
02/08 10:19, , 83F
02/08 10:19, 83F
噓
02/08 10:58, , 84F
02/08 10:58, 84F
噓
02/08 13:57, , 85F
02/08 13:57, 85F
噓
02/09 11:03, , 86F
02/09 11:03, 86F
噓
02/09 23:06, , 87F
02/09 23:06, 87F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):