[討論] 能克勇士的不只馬刺...
能戰勝戰無不勝的勇士的球隊,現在一致討論的是老不死傳說「馬刺」,
但小弟覺得最有機會的反倒是「雷霆」,兩個機會如下:
1. 控衛的對位上,卡哇邦嘎有機會操死咖哩
2. 杜蘭勇士無解
這兩點是其他隊伍沒有的優勢,在陣型上比較有機會威脅勇士。
當然這得建立在幾個前提之下:
1. 卡哇邦嘎沒有腦充血
2. 杜蘭正常表現
2. 伊巴卡&小兵能捍衛籃板&削減Barnes&green的威脅
各位大大覺得呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.155.166.240
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1449677259.A.71F.html
噓
12/10 00:08, , 1F
12/10 00:08, 1F
哈哈,NBA版總需要保持活絡
噓
12/10 00:08, , 2F
12/10 00:08, 2F
噓
12/10 00:08, , 3F
12/10 00:08, 3F
噓 Khan0826 : 雷霆有機會 但你的論點很廢
不過如過我是教練,確實就會不斷做mismatch, 放任忍者龜瘋打 12/10 00:08
→ BIGBBB : 假設太多 只有馬刺比較有機會
不會只有一隊的 12/10 00:08
推 kaj1983 : 你忘了輸給自己
所以表現得正常 12/10 00:08
噓
12/10 00:09, , 4F
12/10 00:09, 4F
沒有喔,很多都不可以,像是黃蜂(笑)
噓
12/10 00:09, , 5F
12/10 00:09, 5F
以陣型上去安排,咖哩有機會只能守溪河
噓
12/10 00:09, , 6F
12/10 00:09, 6F
噓
12/10 00:10, , 7F
12/10 00:10, 7F
噓
12/10 00:10, , 8F
12/10 00:10, 8F
真的,酸酸比丟論點的多
→
12/10 00:11, , 9F
12/10 00:11, 9F
我也是,我喜歡以前肢体碰撞很多的年代,现在太乾净,看的很烦
噓
12/10 00:12, , 10F
12/10 00:12, 10F
*口*
噓
12/10 00:13, , 11F
12/10 00:13, 11F
推
12/10 00:14, , 12F
12/10 00:14, 12F
这倒是不安定因素,不过不是没机会喔
→
12/10 00:14, , 13F
12/10 00:14, 13F
→
12/10 00:14, , 14F
12/10 00:14, 14F
放在回憶裡
推
12/10 00:15, , 15F
12/10 00:15, 15F
帕森斯突然化身2個喬治的時候
→
12/10 00:15, , 16F
12/10 00:15, 16F
※ 編輯: kalapan (124.155.166.240), 12/10/2015 00:24:04
噓
12/10 00:16, , 17F
12/10 00:16, 17F
噓
12/10 00:17, , 18F
12/10 00:17, 18F
推
12/10 00:18, , 19F
12/10 00:18, 19F
→
12/10 00:18, , 20F
12/10 00:18, 20F
推
12/10 00:19, , 21F
12/10 00:19, 21F
噓
12/10 00:21, , 22F
12/10 00:21, 22F
謝啦,已修正,不過肥宅我已35,謝謝大哥^^
※ 編輯: kalapan (124.155.166.240), 12/10/2015 00:25:28
噓
12/10 00:25, , 23F
12/10 00:25, 23F
選字沒選好,拍ㄙㄟˇ
※ 編輯: kalapan (124.155.166.240), 12/10/2015 00:26:17
噓
12/10 00:26, , 24F
12/10 00:26, 24F
→
12/10 00:27, , 25F
12/10 00:27, 25F
→
12/10 00:27, , 26F
12/10 00:27, 26F
噓
12/10 00:31, , 27F
12/10 00:31, 27F
→
12/10 00:31, , 28F
12/10 00:31, 28F
→
12/10 00:35, , 29F
12/10 00:35, 29F
→
12/10 00:35, , 30F
12/10 00:35, 30F
→
12/10 00:35, , 31F
12/10 00:35, 31F
推
12/10 00:38, , 32F
12/10 00:38, 32F
→
12/10 00:39, , 33F
12/10 00:39, 33F
噓
12/10 00:42, , 34F
12/10 00:42, 34F
推
12/10 00:42, , 35F
12/10 00:42, 35F
噓
12/10 00:44, , 36F
12/10 00:44, 36F
噓
12/10 00:45, , 37F
12/10 00:45, 37F
推
12/10 00:52, , 38F
12/10 00:52, 38F
推
12/10 01:02, , 39F
12/10 01:02, 39F
推
12/10 01:10, , 40F
12/10 01:10, 40F
噓
12/10 01:14, , 41F
12/10 01:14, 41F
噓
12/10 01:14, , 42F
12/10 01:14, 42F
推
12/10 01:22, , 43F
12/10 01:22, 43F
噓
12/10 01:24, , 44F
12/10 01:24, 44F
推
12/10 01:29, , 45F
12/10 01:29, 45F
噓
12/10 01:58, , 46F
12/10 01:58, 46F
推
12/10 02:07, , 47F
12/10 02:07, 47F
噓
12/10 03:31, , 48F
12/10 03:31, 48F
推
12/10 04:48, , 49F
12/10 04:48, 49F
噓
12/10 04:54, , 50F
12/10 04:54, 50F
噓
12/10 07:11, , 51F
12/10 07:11, 51F
推
12/10 07:18, , 52F
12/10 07:18, 52F
→
12/10 07:18, , 53F
12/10 07:18, 53F
推
12/10 07:42, , 54F
12/10 07:42, 54F
推
12/10 07:47, , 55F
12/10 07:47, 55F
推
12/10 08:02, , 56F
12/10 08:02, 56F
推
12/10 08:02, , 57F
12/10 08:02, 57F
噓
12/10 08:15, , 58F
12/10 08:15, 58F
噓
12/10 08:20, , 59F
12/10 08:20, 59F
推
12/10 08:32, , 60F
12/10 08:32, 60F
→
12/10 09:15, , 61F
12/10 09:15, 61F
噓
12/10 09:16, , 62F
12/10 09:16, 62F
推
12/10 09:35, , 63F
12/10 09:35, 63F
推
12/10 10:14, , 64F
12/10 10:14, 64F
噓
12/10 12:09, , 65F
12/10 12:09, 65F
推
05/23 11:58, , 66F
05/23 11:58, 66F
→
05/23 12:03, , 67F
05/23 12:03, 67F
推
05/23 12:10, , 68F
05/23 12:10, 68F
推
05/23 14:28, , 69F
05/23 14:28, 69F
推
05/23 18:39, , 70F
05/23 18:39, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)