Re: [討論] 勇士小個陣容和熱火二連霸陣容 誰比較強?
推文很多人說熱火當年很強
但我怎麼記得12年打bb到總冠的bb隊
13靠雷槍救援
縮水賽季就不說了大家都一樣
冠軍還是冠軍沒錯
但說很強好像也還好,還是我只是印象派
有人能為我解答嗎
※ 引述《ztopip ()》之銘言:
: 看新聞
: Stephen Curry、Klay Thompson、Iguodala、Harrison Barnes 和 Draymond Green
: 這5人組合就是勇士終極必勝組合
: 每100回合淨勝分竟然達到了68.1分,無疑是逆天的存在
: 讓人想到當初熱火二連霸時
: 熱火當時也是因為苦於高度不足
: 就用Bosh當C 靠著強硬的輪轉防守 硬是打出二連霸
: 當時還有人特別研究熱火的輪轉防守
: 同樣都是以小個子陣容聞名
: 請問勇士5小陣容和熱火二連霸陣容 誰比較強?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.139.70.112
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1448211186.A.EFC.html
推
11/23 00:54, , 1F
11/23 00:54, 1F
→
11/23 00:54, , 2F
11/23 00:54, 2F
噓
11/23 00:56, , 3F
11/23 00:56, 3F
史上第一不予置評
推
11/23 00:57, , 4F
11/23 00:57, 4F
如果是看連勝來決定誰比較強
那幹嘛不等勇士能不能破熱火紀錄
就可以知道誰比較強啦何必問
※ 編輯: deity00 (101.139.70.112), 11/23/2015 01:01:00
推
11/23 01:02, , 5F
11/23 01:02, 5F
沒錯但不就跟很多人覺得勇士冠軍不純一樣?
→
11/23 01:02, , 6F
11/23 01:02, 6F
沒不對但不可否認有掙扎過
跟14馬刺團隊80啪命中屌打對面
似乎也沒推文形容的很強
※ 編輯: deity00 (101.139.70.112), 11/23/2015 01:09:23
→
11/23 01:03, , 7F
11/23 01:03, 7F
→
11/23 01:08, , 8F
11/23 01:08, 8F
→
11/23 01:08, , 9F
11/23 01:08, 9F
推
11/23 01:08, , 10F
11/23 01:08, 10F
→
11/23 01:10, , 11F
11/23 01:10, 11F
推
11/23 01:11, , 12F
11/23 01:11, 12F
→
11/23 01:11, , 13F
11/23 01:11, 13F
噓
11/23 01:15, , 14F
11/23 01:15, 14F
→
11/23 01:15, , 15F
11/23 01:15, 15F
推
11/23 01:16, , 16F
11/23 01:16, 16F
噓
11/23 01:19, , 17F
11/23 01:19, 17F
→
11/23 01:20, , 18F
11/23 01:20, 18F
噓
11/23 01:20, , 19F
11/23 01:20, 19F
噓
11/23 01:21, , 20F
11/23 01:21, 20F
推
11/23 01:22, , 21F
11/23 01:22, 21F
→
11/23 01:22, , 22F
11/23 01:22, 22F
推
11/23 01:26, , 23F
11/23 01:26, 23F
噓
11/23 01:36, , 24F
11/23 01:36, 24F
→
11/23 01:36, , 25F
11/23 01:36, 25F
噓
11/23 01:39, , 26F
11/23 01:39, 26F
噓
11/23 01:45, , 27F
11/23 01:45, 27F
推
11/23 02:04, , 28F
11/23 02:04, 28F
→
11/23 02:18, , 29F
11/23 02:18, 29F
→
11/23 02:18, , 30F
11/23 02:18, 30F
噓
11/23 02:26, , 31F
11/23 02:26, 31F
噓
11/23 02:31, , 32F
11/23 02:31, 32F
→
11/23 02:32, , 33F
11/23 02:32, 33F
→
11/23 02:33, , 34F
11/23 02:33, 34F
→
11/23 02:34, , 35F
11/23 02:34, 35F
噓
11/23 03:17, , 36F
11/23 03:17, 36F
→
11/23 03:35, , 37F
11/23 03:35, 37F
→
11/23 03:35, , 38F
11/23 03:35, 38F
噓
11/23 03:39, , 39F
11/23 03:39, 39F
→
11/23 03:39, , 40F
11/23 03:39, 40F
→
11/23 03:39, , 41F
11/23 03:39, 41F
噓
11/23 06:59, , 42F
11/23 06:59, 42F
→
11/23 06:59, , 43F
11/23 06:59, 43F
噓
11/23 07:03, , 44F
11/23 07:03, 44F
噓
11/23 07:34, , 45F
11/23 07:34, 45F
噓
11/23 07:34, , 46F
11/23 07:34, 46F
噓
11/23 08:12, , 47F
11/23 08:12, 47F
噓
11/23 08:22, , 48F
11/23 08:22, 48F
噓
11/23 09:01, , 49F
11/23 09:01, 49F
噓
11/23 09:02, , 50F
11/23 09:02, 50F
→
11/23 09:03, , 51F
11/23 09:03, 51F
→
11/23 09:04, , 52F
11/23 09:04, 52F
→
11/23 09:04, , 53F
11/23 09:04, 53F
→
11/23 09:05, , 54F
11/23 09:05, 54F
→
11/23 09:06, , 55F
11/23 09:06, 55F
噓
11/23 09:09, , 56F
11/23 09:09, 56F
噓
11/23 09:11, , 57F
11/23 09:11, 57F
→
11/23 09:12, , 58F
11/23 09:12, 58F
噓
11/23 09:12, , 59F
11/23 09:12, 59F
噓
11/23 09:14, , 60F
11/23 09:14, 60F
噓
11/23 09:44, , 61F
11/23 09:44, 61F
噓
11/23 09:57, , 62F
11/23 09:57, 62F
噓
11/23 13:15, , 63F
11/23 13:15, 63F
噓
11/24 00:35, , 64F
11/24 00:35, 64F
噓
11/24 13:16, , 65F
11/24 13:16, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇):