[討論] 冒昧問:姆斯為何不練中距離後仰跳投?
姆斯毫無疑問,絕對是地球第一人,世界最強,更可能是太陽系的王者
可是問題來了:每次看他打球,都覺得他的方式"看起來"很累。(這個不確定,也許他覺
得這樣很輕鬆)
坦克切入,架開防守球員,雙手上籃or爆扣
籃底下撿到球,小人物上籃。
偶爾出現的中距離
還有時常出現的超豪洨三分球(主要是距離遠)
他從18歲,第一年進NBA開始,就已經超越聯盟90%的傢伙了。第二年開始即站在聯盟最頂
端的位置。The chosen one,救世主,被選中的人。這是媒體給他的評價,更是世人公認
的代名詞。
會得到4次MVP(有異議,應該是5次),一定有其技術獨到之處,絕對不可能只依賴體能。
普通人會說他是生化人,所以在聯盟打滾了12年,到30歲,還是可以繼續以體能球稱霸聯
盟。但是,怎麼想都很詭異...
是不是平凡人看不出姆斯的技術?例如平凡人說姆斯沒有中距離,沒有急停跳投,沒有後
仰跳投。助攻多只是切入後被包夾,不得不分球,而不是像CP3或NASH這樣,真正解讀場
上球員的動向...
以上只是一般明星球員吃飯的工具,可Lebron James不是,他是獨特的,練這些會揠苗助
長...這真的是「Lebron James式籃球」的精髓嗎?
世人對姆斯的不了解和誤解實在是太多了...我們這些平凡人都很想知道:姆斯為什麼長
不出穩定的中距離急停/後仰跳投?是真的不需要,還是他另有技術?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.163.70.151
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1434555344.A.9DA.html
推
06/17 23:36, , 1F
06/17 23:36, 1F
→
06/17 23:36, , 2F
06/17 23:36, 2F
推
06/17 23:37, , 3F
06/17 23:37, 3F
→
06/17 23:37, , 4F
06/17 23:37, 4F
推
06/17 23:37, , 5F
06/17 23:37, 5F
→
06/17 23:37, , 6F
06/17 23:37, 6F
→
06/17 23:37, , 7F
06/17 23:37, 7F
→
06/17 23:37, , 8F
06/17 23:37, 8F
推
06/17 23:37, , 9F
06/17 23:37, 9F
推
06/17 23:38, , 10F
06/17 23:38, 10F
推
06/17 23:38, , 11F
06/17 23:38, 11F
→
06/17 23:38, , 12F
06/17 23:38, 12F
噓
06/17 23:38, , 13F
06/17 23:38, 13F
→
06/17 23:38, , 14F
06/17 23:38, 14F
→
06/17 23:38, , 15F
06/17 23:38, 15F
→
06/17 23:38, , 16F
06/17 23:38, 16F
推
06/17 23:39, , 17F
06/17 23:39, 17F
→
06/17 23:39, , 18F
06/17 23:39, 18F
→
06/17 23:39, , 19F
06/17 23:39, 19F
→
06/17 23:40, , 20F
06/17 23:40, 20F
推
06/17 23:40, , 21F
06/17 23:40, 21F
推
06/17 23:40, , 22F
06/17 23:40, 22F
噓
06/17 23:40, , 23F
06/17 23:40, 23F
→
06/17 23:40, , 24F
06/17 23:40, 24F
推
06/17 23:41, , 25F
06/17 23:41, 25F
推
06/17 23:41, , 26F
06/17 23:41, 26F
噓
06/17 23:41, , 27F
06/17 23:41, 27F
推
06/17 23:41, , 28F
06/17 23:41, 28F
噓
06/17 23:41, , 29F
06/17 23:41, 29F
→
06/17 23:42, , 30F
06/17 23:42, 30F
→
06/17 23:42, , 31F
06/17 23:42, 31F
→
06/17 23:42, , 32F
06/17 23:42, 32F
→
06/17 23:42, , 33F
06/17 23:42, 33F
→
06/17 23:42, , 34F
06/17 23:42, 34F
→
06/17 23:42, , 35F
06/17 23:42, 35F
→
06/17 23:42, , 36F
06/17 23:42, 36F
推
06/17 23:42, , 37F
06/17 23:42, 37F
推
06/17 23:43, , 38F
06/17 23:43, 38F
→
06/17 23:43, , 39F
06/17 23:43, 39F
還有 75 則推文
→
06/18 00:12, , 115F
06/18 00:12, 115F
→
06/18 00:13, , 116F
06/18 00:13, 116F
→
06/18 00:13, , 117F
06/18 00:13, 117F
→
06/18 00:13, , 118F
06/18 00:13, 118F
推
06/18 00:14, , 119F
06/18 00:14, 119F
→
06/18 00:17, , 120F
06/18 00:17, 120F
→
06/18 00:17, , 121F
06/18 00:17, 121F
推
06/18 00:18, , 122F
06/18 00:18, 122F
→
06/18 00:20, , 123F
06/18 00:20, 123F
→
06/18 00:20, , 124F
06/18 00:20, 124F
推
06/18 00:21, , 125F
06/18 00:21, 125F
噓
06/18 00:27, , 126F
06/18 00:27, 126F
噓
06/18 00:31, , 127F
06/18 00:31, 127F
→
06/18 00:32, , 128F
06/18 00:32, 128F
→
06/18 00:33, , 129F
06/18 00:33, 129F
→
06/18 00:33, , 130F
06/18 00:33, 130F
→
06/18 00:34, , 131F
06/18 00:34, 131F
→
06/18 00:34, , 132F
06/18 00:34, 132F
推
06/18 00:35, , 133F
06/18 00:35, 133F
推
06/18 00:43, , 134F
06/18 00:43, 134F
→
06/18 00:57, , 135F
06/18 00:57, 135F
推
06/18 01:07, , 136F
06/18 01:07, 136F
推
06/18 01:13, , 137F
06/18 01:13, 137F
推
06/18 01:25, , 138F
06/18 01:25, 138F
→
06/18 01:26, , 139F
06/18 01:26, 139F
→
06/18 01:37, , 140F
06/18 01:37, 140F
噓
06/18 02:02, , 141F
06/18 02:02, 141F
推
06/18 02:40, , 142F
06/18 02:40, 142F
→
06/18 02:56, , 143F
06/18 02:56, 143F
推
06/18 04:26, , 144F
06/18 04:26, 144F
→
06/18 06:49, , 145F
06/18 06:49, 145F
噓
06/18 07:36, , 146F
06/18 07:36, 146F
噓
06/18 08:07, , 147F
06/18 08:07, 147F
推
06/18 08:30, , 148F
06/18 08:30, 148F
推
06/18 08:57, , 149F
06/18 08:57, 149F
推
06/18 09:23, , 150F
06/18 09:23, 150F
→
06/18 09:23, , 151F
06/18 09:23, 151F
推
06/18 09:45, , 152F
06/18 09:45, 152F
推
06/18 10:39, , 153F
06/18 10:39, 153F
→
06/18 10:39, , 154F
06/18 10:39, 154F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):