Re: [討論] westbrook是否嚴重高估
※ 引述《strmof22 (小鳳梨)》之銘言:
: 想當初一直大三元時
: 下面的推文一面倒的吹捧
: 卡哇幫咖等等
: 但鍵盤box來看 場均4.3的失誤
: 助攻王卻是paul wall領先→ 得分王卻是RW領先喔
: 他們場均有十次左右的助攻
: 助攻不到十次 失誤卻超過四次
: 是不是代表他只需要自幹
球員 GP MPG FGM-FGA FG% 3PM-3PA 3P% RPG APG TOPG PPG PER
CP3 73 34.9 7.0-14.4 .483 1.6-4.2 .385 4.6 10.1 2.4 18.8 25.29
JW 73 35.9 6.6-14.6 .450 0.8-2.8 .303 4.7 9.8 3.7 17.6 20.29
RW 58 33.9 9.1-21.3 .426 1.2-3.9 .302 7.2 8.7 4.4 27.5 29.39
先說RW場均上場時間是當中最少的,且PER值最高,光以出手數來看可能會認為他只會自幹
但出手數最多並不代表RW沒有傳助攻、抓籃板,再說RW他還必須分擔KD不在場上的得分。
你說"說穿了是不是只要有這種球權"這種話,請問現在哪個正常的控球後衛會沒球權?
真的有在跟RW的高光的話,會發現RW很常跟Ibaka、Kanter、Adams等長人打擋拆喔,
的確RW比起CP3跟JW是多出了七個出手數,但是為什麼要限制命中率平均4成2的球員出手?
很寫實的從數據上顯示自一月以來,RW帶領雷霆的戰績是26勝15敗,其中還有帶傷打;麻
煩以後少再做什麼搞不好、片面的發言(活塞RJ?湖人JC?頗呵)
另外本季MVP候選人助攻失誤比(ast/to):
Hadern (7.0/4.0)
Curry (7.9/3.1)
LBJ (7.3/4.0)
RW (8.7/4.4)
--
噓 YOYOBOY: 上春晚變魔術露出破綻
→ HowWhy99:樓上你不懂 這才叫yif魔術
→ sunluna: 已經達到能讓自己消失的境界了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.192.61.29
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1427620241.A.1B2.html
推
03/29 17:12, , 1F
03/29 17:12, 1F
推
03/29 17:14, , 2F
03/29 17:14, 2F
推
03/29 17:15, , 3F
03/29 17:15, 3F
※ 編輯: zooyoyo123 (123.192.61.29), 03/29/2015 17:21:33
→
03/29 17:15, , 4F
03/29 17:15, 4F
推
03/29 17:16, , 5F
03/29 17:16, 5F
→
03/29 17:16, , 6F
03/29 17:16, 6F
推
03/29 17:16, , 7F
03/29 17:16, 7F
推
03/29 17:16, , 8F
03/29 17:16, 8F
→
03/29 17:16, , 9F
03/29 17:16, 9F
→
03/29 17:17, , 10F
03/29 17:17, 10F
→
03/29 17:18, , 11F
03/29 17:18, 11F
推
03/29 17:18, , 12F
03/29 17:18, 12F
推
03/29 17:19, , 13F
03/29 17:19, 13F
推
03/29 17:19, , 14F
03/29 17:19, 14F
推
03/29 17:20, , 15F
03/29 17:20, 15F
推
03/29 17:20, , 16F
03/29 17:20, 16F
→
03/29 17:21, , 17F
03/29 17:21, 17F
推
03/29 17:21, , 18F
03/29 17:21, 18F
→
03/29 17:21, , 19F
03/29 17:21, 19F
→
03/29 17:23, , 20F
03/29 17:23, 20F
→
03/29 17:23, , 21F
03/29 17:23, 21F
→
03/29 17:23, , 22F
03/29 17:23, 22F
→
03/29 17:23, , 23F
03/29 17:23, 23F
→
03/29 17:24, , 24F
03/29 17:24, 24F
推
03/29 17:24, , 25F
03/29 17:24, 25F
→
03/29 17:24, , 26F
03/29 17:24, 26F
→
03/29 17:24, , 27F
03/29 17:24, 27F
推
03/29 17:25, , 28F
03/29 17:25, 28F
→
03/29 17:25, , 29F
03/29 17:25, 29F
推
03/29 17:26, , 30F
03/29 17:26, 30F
→
03/29 17:26, , 31F
03/29 17:26, 31F
推
03/29 17:27, , 32F
03/29 17:27, 32F
推
03/29 17:27, , 33F
03/29 17:27, 33F
→
03/29 17:27, , 34F
03/29 17:27, 34F
推
03/29 17:28, , 35F
03/29 17:28, 35F
→
03/29 17:28, , 36F
03/29 17:28, 36F
→
03/29 17:28, , 37F
03/29 17:28, 37F
→
03/29 17:28, , 38F
03/29 17:28, 38F
還有 83 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
03/29 18:52, , 122F
03/29 18:52, 122F
→
03/29 18:53, , 123F
03/29 18:53, 123F
推
03/29 19:43, , 124F
03/29 19:43, 124F
推
03/29 19:46, , 125F
03/29 19:46, 125F
→
03/29 20:06, , 126F
03/29 20:06, 126F
→
03/29 20:09, , 127F
03/29 20:09, 127F
噓
03/29 20:13, , 128F
03/29 20:13, 128F
→
03/29 20:22, , 129F
03/29 20:22, 129F
推
03/29 20:23, , 130F
03/29 20:23, 130F
推
03/29 20:24, , 131F
03/29 20:24, 131F
→
03/29 20:33, , 132F
03/29 20:33, 132F
→
03/29 20:33, , 133F
03/29 20:33, 133F
推
03/29 20:53, , 134F
03/29 20:53, 134F
噓
03/29 20:53, , 135F
03/29 20:53, 135F
推
03/29 20:54, , 136F
03/29 20:54, 136F
噓
03/29 20:56, , 137F
03/29 20:56, 137F
→
03/29 20:56, , 138F
03/29 20:56, 138F
→
03/29 20:57, , 139F
03/29 20:57, 139F
→
03/29 21:00, , 140F
03/29 21:00, 140F
→
03/29 21:06, , 141F
03/29 21:06, 141F
推
03/29 21:29, , 142F
03/29 21:29, 142F
推
03/29 21:44, , 143F
03/29 21:44, 143F
噓
03/29 22:11, , 144F
03/29 22:11, 144F
→
03/29 22:11, , 145F
03/29 22:11, 145F
噓
03/29 22:22, , 146F
03/29 22:22, 146F
→
03/29 22:32, , 147F
03/29 22:32, 147F
→
03/29 23:58, , 148F
03/29 23:58, 148F
→
03/29 23:58, , 149F
03/29 23:58, 149F
→
03/30 00:00, , 150F
03/30 00:00, 150F
推
03/30 00:08, , 151F
03/30 00:08, 151F
→
03/30 00:09, , 152F
03/30 00:09, 152F
噓
03/30 00:21, , 153F
03/30 00:21, 153F
→
03/30 00:22, , 154F
03/30 00:22, 154F
→
03/30 00:24, , 155F
03/30 00:24, 155F
→
03/30 00:24, , 156F
03/30 00:24, 156F
→
03/30 00:25, , 157F
03/30 00:25, 157F
→
03/30 01:27, , 158F
03/30 01:27, 158F
→
03/30 01:28, , 159F
03/30 01:28, 159F
→
03/30 01:29, , 160F
03/30 01:29, 160F
推
03/31 00:11, , 161F
03/31 00:11, 161F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
討論
12
71